I'm sorry 53 Stude, I will not be doing the cold weather simulation. Finished the hot sim last night however, and I think you will like it. I am new to filming and had a little trouble getting the camera to auto focus on the pressure gauge display. I will have it to you as soon as I can, hopefully in a few days.I’ll 2nd that. I am enjoying this thread and it’s information.
OP: I’d be very interested in both tests. Thank You
It would be interesting if you could do at least one filter in the cold flow simulation to get a feel on how much the "PSID vs Flow" increases with thicker oil. If one filter was chosen for the cold test, I'd suggest using the one that did the worse in the hot test to see how much the thicker oil effects the more restrictive filter. If you can't do any cold test I understand, and just throwing this out there. Looking forward to the rest of the videos and tests.
It's not the test, but rather changing the fluid. I have another project that requires the same fluid that is currently in the test rig so I want to get it done for them ASAP in hopes for return business. I can ask a current customer if they will allow me to private message you data on another filter using both hot and cold sim. It is the best I can do for you for now.It would be interesting if you could do at least one filter in the cold flow simulation to get a feel on how much the "PSID vs Flow" increases with thicker oil. If one filter was chosen for the cold test, I'd suggest using the one that did the worse in the hot test to see how much the thicker oil effects the more restrictive filter. If you can't do any cold test I understand, and just throwing this out there. Looking forward to the rest of the videos and tests.
Good luck with your project and your joint venture on YouTube. I'm moving onward myself in a different direction,so I'll take the time to say thanks for the work and information you've provided this part of the forums.
I am still running the efficiency capacity for you. That is not changing. Just the cold sim fluid Pressure vs flow is not going to be run.
Wix XP Failed due to the leaky bypass valve, in theory there would be non filtered fluid getting through that valve going straight to your engine. The flow would be radially inward in for the engine, but in our test the air pressure in our test should have been pushing it shut as it was radially outward.
The Delco was really bubbling out of the seam. When we buy a filter, it may be ok, but we want it to be not just maybe. Same with the bypass, can’t be a maybe it’s ok. Actually seeing the bubbles leaking and it being a fail, would eliminate any of those
I think you hit the nail on the head. It is pretty nice to see all the curves on the same graph. I absolutely hope this test data helps clear a few things up. Perhaps there may be a correlation form the deltaP curves to predict which will be the most efficient. We shale see
It's pretty much been know for many moons that the difference in delta-p with hot oil isn't going to be that much different between main stream oil filters. As far as no-name odd ball oil filters ... who knows, but I'd think there would be a lot more variation with some of those filters.
It is pretty nice to see all the curves on the same graph. I absolutely hope this test data helps clear a few things up. Perhaps there may be a correlation form the deltaP curves to predict which will be the most efficient. We shale see
Automatic, way to many calculations to do by hand for me. I do not like the report format example given in the ISO 4548-12 and prefer the 16889 look better, so I might change it. Found an error in the example calculations contained in the ISO 4548-12.
