Purolator Boss PBL22500, One PL22500, Classic L22500 Specification Sheet's

[kschachn]

Happy to hear you can see the data first hand & draw your own conclusion. The other fanboi's will personally attack our dissent all the time It's pathetic.

And I for one understand why you have this as your last resort.

And why you drag out “pathetic” along with “hate” and now “fanboi”.

 

[ZeeOSix]

After reading this thread, I asked Purolator for the specification sheets on a couple of 14610 filters I was interested in as well. Got em within a day. I find that impressive. While the filters were different than those posted earlier, the data was almost identical. Sooo .... I sent an email to Fram asking for the same info on a couple of their 7317 filters I'm interested in as well.

All I got in response was: "The efficiency numbers for these filters are not much different, the TG is 99% @ 20 microns and the FE is listed at 99%+ meaning it is fractionally higher than 99%, but we do not have the exact spec listed. " Compared to Purolator's forthrightness, I do not find Fram's response impressive.

Regardless, Frams are more efficient across similar filter lines regardless if you get a Spec Sheet from Fram.

 

[53' Stude]

Regardless, Frams are more efficient across similar filter lines regardless if you get a Spec Sheet from Fram.

That’s dam right

 

[roger dodger]

Golly, all I was trying to do was share what I learned. Didn't realize I'd get dragged into all this. Won't make that mistake on this forum again.

 

[fantastic]

That’s dam right

Don't be misled... That is not true across the board... Here's one that is 99%@17um for example. Below shows just one example of a Purolator that IS more efficient than Fram's claims.

 

[kschachn]

If you are lucky enough for that to fit your vehicle. Perhaps my Honda?

 

[ZeeOSix]

Don't be misled... That is not true across the board... Here's one that is 99%@17um for example. Below shows just one example of a Purolator that IS more efficient than Fram's claims.
View attachment 199902

Bet you can't find 1 or 2 more that are that efficient. Why doesn't Purolator use that model as their efficiency reference model on their website? Instead, they reference the PL30001 which the data sheet shows to be 99% @ 25u, yet Purolator says the PL30001 is 99% @ 20u on their website reference. Those don't even match ... sloppy advertising specs.

PurolatorONE™ Oil Filters

PurolatorONE™ Oil Filters deliver advanced engine protection for peak performance, making them one of the best oil filters for many drivers today.

www.purolatornow.com