straight kero in oil panMight try 0W00 next and get it over with …
What's concerning is that you think this requires a vivid imagination. You ever see a block get window'd Bill? Because I have. Sometimes the rod goes out the side, sometimes it goes out the pan, sometimes it goes out both. Spinning a rod bearing isn't some uber-rare event, and the results are often very messy.
Edit, here's some idiot windowing the block in his BMW M3. Note the fire and resultant oil slick:
Supplying an oil to the system that does not meet the minimum needed viscosity will result in the same. I would opine that a highway trip for 150-200 miles will have the viscosity near zero and the twin turbochargers will be the first to go at some point.My view is this is not a ”one time” for this lad. Starving an engine oil pump of oil is completely different. Compare apples to apples.
Do you know how oil grades are measured?My view is this is not a ”one time” for this lad. Starving an engine oil pump of oil is completely different. Compare apples to apples. If a car overheats the normal weight oil overheats and goes thin. It is not out of reach of thinking that 0w oil goes through to the 5 weight oil to get to what ever weight oil is normal successfully.
Admirable for what though? Other than a slight fuel economy increase what benefit is there to “proving” you can run the oil without damaging the engine? I’m still a little unsure what the advantage is, if any.The spirit of what he is doing is admirable and he obviously has the money to replace the engine, but at the same time, other than a zero sum game, nothing is going to be proven because this is not a controlled test by any stretch of the imagination.
Just from the viewpoint that he is willing to destroy the engine at a cost. As I said, there is nothing going to be proven here--not even that an engine can run on this viscosity because there will be no results (perhaps pass/fail--but for how long is questionable) to show wear rates, etc.Admirable for what though? Other than a slight fuel economy increase what benefit is there to “proving” you can run the oil without damaging the engine? I’m still a little unsure what the advantage is, if any.
104 deg. and 212 deg. f. viscosity in relation to the 2nd 212 deg. viscosity number as if that 2nd number was a straight viscosity number. All oil starts off too thick and with temperature gets thinner.Do you know how oil grades are measured?
Fluid is not compressible to an oil pump, all viscosity oil pumps the same as a positive displacement until the pump goes into bypass.Supplying an oil to the system that does not meet the minimum needed viscosity will result in the same. I would opine that a highway trip for 150-200 miles will have the viscosity near zero and the twin turbochargers will be the first to go at some point.
The spirit of what he is doing is admirable and he obviously has the money to replace the engine, but at the same time, other than a zero sum game, nothing is going to be proven because this is not a controlled test by any stretch of the imagination.
What's concerning is that you think this requires a vivid imagination. You ever see a block get window'd Bill? Because I have. Sometimes the rod goes out the side, sometimes it goes out the pan, sometimes it goes out both. Spinning a rod bearing isn't some uber-rare event, and the results are often very messy.
Edit, here's some idiot windowing the block in his BMW M3. Note the fire and resultant oil slick:
And do tell how that is applicable here.Fluid is not compressible to an oil pump, all viscosity oil pumps the same as a positive displacement until the pump goes into bypass.
Such as the “Will an engine run on bacon grease? Let’s find out!” tests.Just from the viewpoint that he is willing to destroy the engine at a cost. As I said, there is nothing going to be proven here--not even that an engine can run on this viscosity because there will be no results (perhaps pass/fail--but for how long is questionable) to show wear rates, etc.
As you have suggested, any true R&D scientist would be using this as an office joke to share with his/her colleagues of how not to perform testing...
You got it!Such as the “Will an engine run on bacon grease? Let’s find out!” tests.
Well… If there is RPM on the engine the oil is pumping and the bearings are in hydrodynamic portion of the Stribeck curve. Cold start 0w-5 is the same viscosity as what you have in your car when you start it when cold. There is oil separation and the engine will not blow up. The 5 viscosity is at 212 F oil temperature whatever cSt that is. The engine made it there without catastrophic failure.And do tell how that is applicable here.
You seem to be suggesting that as long as the oil pump does not go into bypass that viscosity is irrelevant.
And most run a 10W-60 engine oil. Although HTHS is the greater consideration here, not necessarily viscosity."Those engines only last a pass or two and are then torn down and rebuilt for the next race usually on the same day."
Formula 1 cars are required to use the same engine for 2 or 3 races and still be able to win without any rebuild or modification between uses.
Formula 1 have an interesting start procedure due to the bearing clearances. Oil is heated reducing the viscosity of the 10w-60 oil before start.And most run a 10W-60 engine oil. Although HTHS is the greater consideration here, not necessarily viscosity.
Oil separation?Well… If there is RPM on the engine the oil is pumping and the bearings are in hydrodynamic portion of the Stribeck curve. Cold start 0w-5 is the same viscosity as what you have in your car when you start it when cold. There is oil separation and the engine will not blow up. The 5 viscosity is at 212 F oil temperature whatever cSt that is. The engine made it there without catastrophic failure.