In an SAE paper I presented earlier: (
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...-5-were-unacceptable-for-wear-control.364170/ )
wear was steady above a HTHS of 2.5 but only doubled when the HTHS dropped to 1.8. I am using an oil at 1.6. That study used unrealistic stresses and non fully formulated SG mineral based oils. The engine was lop-sided and the oil temperature was steadily kept at 150C in the feed lines. So with my situation I should be safe in my opinion.
No, they did not study 1,000 cars nor engines and do a double blind study et cetera. And yet the editors at SAE thought it was a study worth publishing. I’ll bet few here knows what it takes for them to accept a study for publication. Often initial papers and results are sent back to the researches many times with suggestions as to how to better the study and interpretations. It can take many months or even years after a work is initially completed before it gets published.
Even the famous “Taxi Study” (
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/the-frequently-quoted-taxi-study-sae-2005-01-3818.364101/ )
had only 4 taxis with each type of oil. ‘Not exactly statistically significant.
Maybe we should entirely eliminate the UOA section of this web site since people are given advice on a single UOA. The advise could be wholly misleading and totally wrong based on a single test.
I say again. I am an experimenter and present my data. Some will get some benefit from it. I also have experimented with other things. Like various types of grass here in Florida and presented the data to Florida pesticide applicators during courses I teach for them. I have done experiments on mulch for the garden. I have made various changes to scuba diving gear, model airplanes, electronics and others areas of interest to me. I have had intercourse with manufacturers.
People can learn from these things or throw stones at me. I learned something when I was reviewing an article for publication in a medical journal. Many reviewers said it was worthless for a bunch of reasons and that it should not be published. I was one of them. The article was published anyway because it had a very very important lesson in it that was part of the story, and not at first obvious.
One test vehicle showing evidence that a modern 5 grade oil can be used in a lower stressed SUV may be valuable to some. A person who chooses to try a 20 grade oil in such a truck specifying a 30 grade oil may feel more comfortable doing so. Would it not be beneficial to gain just one piece of knowledge, if you look for it, rather than use all your energy to find fault?
ali