Sequence VH is run on a Ford 4.6L 2V Modular. This is a 216hr test, for 216hrs to equal 3,000 miles for example, that's an average vehicle speed of 13.9 mph, 5,000 miles, 23.15 mph.
The Modular is not exactly what I would call "hard on oil", and a pass does not require pristine oil control rings or lands.
This, above, is a great example of how we shouldn't make blanket statements regarding oils, as if lubes are a one-size-fits-all product. Any one particular situation may or may not require a specific lube property or benefit.
*************************
The following is my opinion; others may or may not agree. That's OK... BITOGers are not required to agree; only to be civil.
Some engines are very, very easy on oil. Some are not. Those which are easy on lube tend to have lower power-to-displacement ratios. Those which are hard on lube tend to have higher power density. We could run a long list of engines that are easy on oil and will last a very long time. We could also run a long list of engines that are hard on lubes and tend to be trouble-prone in long-term operation.
It can't be a coincidence that many of today's modern, high-tech engines seem to have issues, or at the very least require a very robust lube just to survive. Whereas the engines of yesteryear glide by with inexpensive lubes and yet run for multiples of hundreds of thousands of miles without issue.
Ford, in particular, seems to be the king of making examples of the two extremes. I cannot think of a Ford engine in the last 40 years that didn't tend to be very, very reliable, or very, very trouble prone. There is nothing they made that falls into the "good but not great" category. They either made a fantastic or a terrible engine depending on what you bought. I've seen (literally) thousands of UOAs and dozens of anecdotal high-mileage stories of the Modular 2v engines, as well as the Cyclone v-6 family; these are outstanding engines. Contrast those to the horrors of the Modular 3v variants and the EB engines (especially the 4yl units); no further explanations are required.
Yes - anyone can point to a singular example of a success or failure; something they owned or someone they knew of. But engine stereotypes exist for a reason.
I believe the key to engine reliability lies in the power-to-displacement factor. If you have an engine that is full of technology and high-power density, you're gonna need the best lube you can afford to run if you want any hope of making it last a long time. And even then, lubricants cannot overcome poor engineering and shoddy manufacturing issues.
If you want a cockroach on wheels, go get a Panther 4.6L 2v, or maybe a GM 3800 FWD car. Drive them into Armageddon using house brand oils every 10k miles ... it literally won't matter.