I wonder if the valves were adjusted, and how many times
That’s antidotal evidenceI will start by saying I normally run 5w-30 in my Sierra which calls for 0w-20. Not looking to start yet another thick vs thin argument. But had to share this.
I came across this group on FB:https://www.facebook.com/groups/938184509942736/?ref=share&mibextid=S66gvF
One post was about an almost million mile Accord, run it’s whole life on 5w-20, and mostly Mobil 1 at 15k intervals: https://www.driveaccord.net/threads...TYp5sI7jMPwQ5jVPG868CMlYoV8PG_yXywWa9LbfBDTYA
That’s OK, I stepped on a stinking pile of MOFT.Wut ? I woke up with Chapter 5 on my face …
Do you really need to know? 5w-20 came out in 2002. Whenever the car was made the viscosity rules… Ford would love you to change, the car is out of warranty. So… Is the engine today made for the viscosity in the OM.But what about Ford back specking my '93 F150 to 5w-20 when the sticker under the hood (and OM) says 10w-30? Is that OK? I really need to know.
Which is exactly my point. Some of us, me included, go against manufacturers specs thinking that 20wt is “too thin” to properly protect an engine. This is evidence (if ANECDOTAL) that this is not the case.That’s antidotal evidence
I only run what the manufacturer says to.
Where are we studying engine wear?It will be interesting to study the engine wear of the new Toyota dynamic force engines which are all speced for 0W-16 with 10k mile oil change intervals with the low 50% efficiency Toyota oil filters. So far, no issues reported, but I will avoid any of those "0W-16" Toyota's with over 100k in the used car market in the future.
Yes but the correlation between MOFT and wear is not anecdotal.That’s antidotal evidence
I only run what the manufacturer says to.
I no longer buy used or rental cars. I don't want one that's been run on anything less than xx-30.I use 5W-30 Penzoil Platinum high mileage with a HTHS of about 3.1/3.2 with 4k mile oil change Intervals.
I also use Fram Ultra Synthetic Oil and Air Filters with an efficiency of 99%+ @ 20 Microns.
My vehicles are speced for 20 weight oils, but I won't ever use a 20 weight oil or a low efficiency Oil or air filter.
It will be interesting to study the engine wear of the new Toyota dynamic force engines which are all speced for 0W-16 with 10k mile oil change intervals with the low 50% efficiency Toyota oil filters. So far, no issues reported, but I will avoid any of those "0W-16" Toyota's with over 100k in the used car market in the future.
That's the best 1 liner I've ever read on BITOG website. 100% agree.I no longer buy used or rental cars. I don't want one that's been run on anything less than xx-30.
toyotanation forum to see posts about engine wear for high mileage Toyota ran on 0W-16 with 10k oil change intervals and Toyota low efficiency filters. Also, I check Consumer Reports Magazine (I have a subscription) to check repair history of Engine Major/Engine Minor issues on these vehicles. Like I said, no evidence yet, but I'll be keeping an eye on this (out of curiosity) over the next decade.Where are we studying engine wear?
Sorry I find that sophomoric in nature to believe that a average joe knows more about COF than the mechanical engineers that designed and tested that specific engine for that specific viscosity. Facebook pages and quotes from unverified sources is not reliable. Nor is well my daddy always did it like that so I am going to do the same. We’re moving to thinner oils and tighter tolerances of engine parts. Thicker isn’t always better.Yes but the correlation between MOFT and wear is not anecdotal.
Much less antidotal.
Can you provide an example of the “tighter tolerances of engine parts”?Sorry I find that sophomoric in nature to believe that a average joe knows more about COF than the mechanical engineers that designed and tested that specific engine for that specific viscosity. Facebook pages and quotes from unverified sources is not reliable. Nor is well my daddy always did it like that so I am going to do the same. We’re moving to thinner oils and tighter tolerances of engine parts. Thicker isn’t always better.
I haven't seen any evidence of tighter tolerances - same engines speced in Europe for 5W-30/5W-40.Sorry I find that sophomoric in nature to believe that a average joe knows more about COF than the mechanical engineers that designed and tested that specific engine for that specific viscosity. Facebook pages and quotes from unverified sources is not reliable. Nor is well my daddy always did it like that so I am going to do the same. We’re moving to thinner oils and tighter tolerances of engine parts. Thicker isn’t always better.