edyvw
$50 site donor 2025
Ah. Yes. I see. I think Castrol Edge 5W40 is 3.64.Yep, but it answered the question![]()
Ah. Yes. I see. I think Castrol Edge 5W40 is 3.64.Yep, but it answered the question![]()
The SAE test I presented is a valid one regarding the minimums. Last I checked this thread is about how HTHS is measured.HTHS is not the whole story. Mobil1 0W40 is 3.6 or just bit above. But I would take it on track before pretty much any off the shelf oil.
It is valid one. This topic is about HTHS. And point is?The SAE test I presented is a valid one regarding the minimums. Last I checked this thread is about how HTHS is measured.![]()
No point, Carry on...It is valid one. This topic is about HTHS. And point is?
I agree but also think it's somewhat more complicated than that for us BITOG's LOL There's the 2017+ FA-4 HDEO's that really seek out MPG as an example. Those are going to allow lower HTHS. Then we have superior Euro's like product below with HTHS at 4.4.I think it's important to differentiate between HDEO grades and Euro grades here, since the HDEO's, generally, have higher HTHS, even in the same grades as the Euros (0W-40/5W-40/10W-40), hence my D1 example, which has a much higher HTHS than your typical Euro 0W-40.
Yeah, the Redline white bottle stuff always has high HTHS for the grade, so that's not surprising. The P66/Kendall 5W-40 with actual approvals (Redline Professional Series) that you also linked is more typical, with an HTHS of 3.7cP.I agree but also think it's somewhat more complicated than that for us BITOG's LOL There's the 2017+ FA-4 HDEO's that really seek out MPG as an example. Those are going to allow lower HTHS. Then we have superior Euro's like product below with HTHS at 4.4.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/red-line-euro-5w40-voa.392589/#post-7159786
But that is not approved oil. Motul 300V has KV100 13.5 but HTHS is 4cP!I agree but also think it's somewhat more complicated than that for us BITOG's LOL There's the 2017+ FA-4 HDEO's that really seek out MPG as an example. Those are going to allow lower HTHS. Then we have superior Euro's like product below with HTHS at 4.4.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/red-line-euro-5w40-voa.392589/#post-7159786
That was created for the F150 Ecodiesel wasn't it? I think I was using it in my 3.0L LR DiscoveryI agree but also think it's somewhat more complicated than that for us BITOG's LOL There's the 2017+ FA-4 HDEO's that really seek out MPG as an example. Those are going to allow lower HTHS. Then we have superior Euro's like product below with HTHS at 4.4.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/red-line-euro-5w40-voa.392589/#post-7159786
Honest question.... Lets say you had an engine failure. You have an oil like Redline or Amsoil that says it's "Recommended for" or "meets or exceeds". So they feel it's pretty good. 1) Can someone actually pull a sample and determine if the oil in the engine met a spec? On my B58 could they say "Hey this euro oil doesn't meet LL01FE or LL01"? 2) If a company says it's "recommended for" or "meets or exceeds" does the oil company back a motor claim? Like QS saying they warrant 300,000 miles?But that is not approved oil. Motul 300V has KV100 13.5 but HTHS is 4cP!
They could if the wanted (protracted law suit). If that is contention point, they will ask oil receipts and deny if it is not approved oil.Honest question.... Lets say you had an engine failure. You have an oil like Redline or Amsoil that says it's "Recommended for" or "meets or exceeds". So they feel it's pretty good. 1) Can someone actually pull a sample and determine if the oil in the engine met a spec? On my B58 could they say "Hey this euro oil doesn't meet LL01FE or LL01"? 2) If a company says it's "recommended for" or "meets or exceeds" does the oil company back a motor claim? Like QS saying they warrant 300,000 miles?
Approved oil for what? I have no idea what the OP has. Just making a general statement.But that is not approved oil. Motul 300V has KV100 13.5 but HTHS is 4cP!
No, FA-4 shouldn't be used & was not developed for the F-150 or LR.That was created for the F150 Ecodiesel wasn't it? I think I was using it in my 3.0L LR Discovery
It is not approved for anything that is oil intended purpose. That Redline you mentioned. It cannot be approved.Approved oil for what? I have no idea what the OP has. Just making a general statement.
No, FA-4 shouldn't be used & was not developed for the F-150 or LR.
Doesn't bother me, I was talking about HT/HS not approvals. Several boutique oils don't have any approvals.It is not approved for anything that is oil intended purpose. That Redline you mentioned. It cannot be approved.
JFC. It cannot be approved partly bcs. HTHS. Limit on BMW LL01 is 4.1cP. On Mercedes I think it is 4cP.Doesn't bother me, I was talking about HT/HS not approvals. Several boutique oils don't have any approvals.
That's Interesting nonetheless.JFC. It cannot be approved partly bcs. HTHS. Limit on BMW LL01 is 4.1cP. On Mercedes I think it is 4cP.
Very high HTHS is part of an issue why it cannot be approved. Redline 5W40 doesn’t have any approval, bcs. it is also made as track/racing oil, so there are other issues. But very high HTHS is part of why it is not approved.
I put Redline 5w30 in my B58 today. Wanted to see what it was like. It didn't take 30 sec to tell the difference. Smoooooooooth. So far, obviously not an indicator of protection just how the engine feels it's Redline>QS Euro 5w40>Pennzoil Euro L>0w20 trash.JFC. It cannot be approved partly bcs. HTHS. Limit on BMW LL01 is 4.1cP. On Mercedes I think it is 4cP.
Very high HTHS is part of an issue why it cannot be approved. Redline 5W40 doesn’t have any approval, bcs. it is also made as track/racing oil, so there are other issues. But very high HTHS is part of why it is not approved.
Yes, noise is not indicative of protection. M1 for a long time, had a reputation of "loud" oil, but it is one of the best.I put Redline 5w30 in my B58 today. Wanted to see what it was like. It didn't take 30 sec to tell the difference. Smoooooooooth. So far, obviously not an indicator of protection just how the engine feels it's Redline>QS Euro 5w40>Pennzoil Euro L>0w20 trash.
sued for what. I get the marketing aspects but looking at the additive packages, tossing manufacturer approvals aside, what's the actual downside? It seems to be better than amsoil. I know it's costly but considering everything else we're just splitting hairs.Yes, noise is not indicative of protection. M1 for a long time, had a reputation of "loud" oil, but it is one of the best.
RL is sued a lot by people on track. It is a known quality.
That is one amazing typo.RL is sued a lot by people on track. It is a known quality.
lol, used!sued for what. I get the marketing aspects but looking at the additive packages, tossing manufacturer approvals aside, what's the actual downside? It seems to be better than amsoil. I know it's costly but considering everything else we're just splitting hairs.