Seb
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Seb - good post. It's the AHS (Amsoil Hate Syndrome) with some people. I see it all the time. I try to post a lot less lately in rebuttal to these guys, because they just run to Helen or the mods. As Gary said - we wear our bias for all to see, these guys claim zero bias, but.....well it's there.
Anyway - to really know how much the oil oxidized, you will need to have the virgin oil run to compare.
Thanks Pablo, I will look into doing that. I dont have any from the batch I used in the report, but I do have a new batch of SSO I can get tested. It will be interesting.
Originally Posted By: StevieC
I just looked up the first few I could find... I'm not saying he isn't the only one fibbing...
I have used it in 5 engines total of mine own 3 of which are considered "Easy" on oil and the other 2 normal and none would be able to achieve that mileage.
SSO is a fine product but I don't believe it went this far in this engine with those numbers is all I'm saying.
You are entitled to your opinion and I mine... I will look up more UOA's for 20K but on an oil site such as this I'm sure there are people posting just to brag and the mileage is false.
If you can show me a UOA that you, Gary, Molekule, Patman or someone that we know is trust worthy and a long time member I will believe it but not from members like this one that just started here and the add pack looks liks its barely touched.
Sorry just can't buy that especially with a TBN showing what it is when others are at 3-4 with half the miles...
I have no reason to lie about my mileage in the report. You can even say my copper metals are not in line with other TL's.
Shaeffers
RLI
But mine is low. And trending down.
TBN is not linear. You should know this. It can bounce up or down as the oil ages.I don't know what else to say to prove I did the mileage I stated but I can assure you it is accurate. I can post my odometer as of today if you want .
Originally Posted By: INDYMAC
When I first looked at this report, I thought to myself that I wouldn't have run this oil that long because of that oxidation number, with a corresponding elevated nitration number. Since there isn't a VOA of this batch of SSO (or any for that matter), and there is no TAN on this report, I decided to look elsewhere for some VOA info of various oils for starting oxidation numbers. I won't try to guess what the chemistry of this oil is (SSO), but if it has group V oils included, then it's possible that this formula starts out with a much higher oxidation number than conventional or synthetic blend engine oils. AS an example of this would be Redline and RLI, Inc. virgin oils starting in the 150-170 range. Virgin conventional and syn blends usually start at
I can't really follow StevieC's argument about credibility for the OP or the lab. Everything about this UOA tells me the oil was run for a long time, and I haven't seen a lab yet that was accurate enough to show additive consumption during an OCI. Sorry I can't contribute to that discussion.
I agree, there's always a margin of error in every report done. I believe multiple reports and trends give you a better picture on whats going on.
Seb - good post. It's the AHS (Amsoil Hate Syndrome) with some people. I see it all the time. I try to post a lot less lately in rebuttal to these guys, because they just run to Helen or the mods. As Gary said - we wear our bias for all to see, these guys claim zero bias, but.....well it's there.
Anyway - to really know how much the oil oxidized, you will need to have the virgin oil run to compare.
Thanks Pablo, I will look into doing that. I dont have any from the batch I used in the report, but I do have a new batch of SSO I can get tested. It will be interesting.
Originally Posted By: StevieC
I just looked up the first few I could find... I'm not saying he isn't the only one fibbing...
I have used it in 5 engines total of mine own 3 of which are considered "Easy" on oil and the other 2 normal and none would be able to achieve that mileage.
SSO is a fine product but I don't believe it went this far in this engine with those numbers is all I'm saying.
You are entitled to your opinion and I mine... I will look up more UOA's for 20K but on an oil site such as this I'm sure there are people posting just to brag and the mileage is false.
If you can show me a UOA that you, Gary, Molekule, Patman or someone that we know is trust worthy and a long time member I will believe it but not from members like this one that just started here and the add pack looks liks its barely touched.
Sorry just can't buy that especially with a TBN showing what it is when others are at 3-4 with half the miles...
I have no reason to lie about my mileage in the report. You can even say my copper metals are not in line with other TL's.
Shaeffers
RLI
But mine is low. And trending down.
TBN is not linear. You should know this. It can bounce up or down as the oil ages.I don't know what else to say to prove I did the mileage I stated but I can assure you it is accurate. I can post my odometer as of today if you want .
Originally Posted By: INDYMAC
When I first looked at this report, I thought to myself that I wouldn't have run this oil that long because of that oxidation number, with a corresponding elevated nitration number. Since there isn't a VOA of this batch of SSO (or any for that matter), and there is no TAN on this report, I decided to look elsewhere for some VOA info of various oils for starting oxidation numbers. I won't try to guess what the chemistry of this oil is (SSO), but if it has group V oils included, then it's possible that this formula starts out with a much higher oxidation number than conventional or synthetic blend engine oils. AS an example of this would be Redline and RLI, Inc. virgin oils starting in the 150-170 range. Virgin conventional and syn blends usually start at
I can't really follow StevieC's argument about credibility for the OP or the lab. Everything about this UOA tells me the oil was run for a long time, and I haven't seen a lab yet that was accurate enough to show additive consumption during an OCI. Sorry I can't contribute to that discussion.
I agree, there's always a margin of error in every report done. I believe multiple reports and trends give you a better picture on whats going on.