OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Yeah, this is the diesel product that uses esters, which we've discussed previously.Not that old: "2021-08-03 Application granted"
Yeah, this is the diesel product that uses esters, which we've discussed previously.Not that old: "2021-08-03 Application granted"
Yep. I’ve noticed if a certain brand has marketing it’s considered gospel. If anyone posts something remotely negative the goon squad comes out in full force.People will keep on hating with their baseless claims. Notice most of those same folks push other products?
mobile 1Yep. I’ve noticed if a certain brand has marketing it’s considered gospel. If anyone posts something remotely negative the goon squad comes out in full force.
I think they want people to use the R&P just like a normal oil with a normal oil change interval to make it easy. It's a relatively slow clean, so they suggest 4 OCIs to get the full results on dirty engines. If the engine is not very dirty, it might only take one or two OCIs. They most likely would not suggest a longer than normal OCI due to the possible oil filter loading factor.And as a side note, why even bother with 4 OCIs? Why not a couple of longer runs but then change the filter halfway through each. Wouldn’t that achieve the same thing?
While I agree with you, the Restore product those patents are for was developed in conjunction with Cummins to specifically deal with a problem they were having with the ISX engine: ring coking. It was a purpose-built lube not designed for broad market appeal or consumption. Ergo, it was not marketed to Joe Average and his poorly maintained Scion XB, nor was their a price point target set to align with that.So, it looks like I did not find the right patents for this product. But the two patent applications that I did find (both titled "Lubricant for preventing and removing carbon deposits in internal combustion engines") prove that Valvoline has been doing R&D and filing for patents in this area for over a decade, so this is not a hoax thought up by the marketing department as some on this board appear to suspect. Also, LSJR's video showed that they have a pretty impressive test lab. So it appears to me that they have put effort into the science, modeling, experiments, testing, and patenting, and are proud about what they have come up with. How well it works in the real world is yet to be seen, as they admitted in LSJR's video.
Cheese puffs take is not about marketing - he’s basically saying it’s a con job whilst knowing nothing about it - nor LSJ intentions …While I agree with you, the Restore product those patents are for was developed in conjunction with Cummins to specifically deal with a problem they were having with the ISX engine: ring coking. It was a purpose-built lube not designed for broad market appeal or consumption. Ergo, it was not marketed to Joe Average and his poorly maintained Scion XB, nor was their a price point target set to align with that.
There is absolutely an obvious marketing angle to this product that, whether you like @cheesepuffs2's take on the matter or not, is well evidenced by the stuff he has posted. This does NOT mean that the product doesn't work! But it does mean that there is "more going on" here with R&P than there was with Premium Blue Restore.
And for those crowing about Mobil getting a free pass on marketing, the Engineering Explained video when it was first shared, Mobil was crucified for this "marketing exercise" and all manner of hyperbole was spun and aspersions cast about both Mobil and the guy from EE who dared participate in this "promotion".
Advertising stuff always gets crucified on here, no brand is immune, regardless of how the jaded may feel on this.
Probably the most ridiculous spectacle I remember was the fawning over PYB being some sort of super cleaner, a myth plucked from the ether, seemingly without parent, and spread like a virus.
This is on the Valvoline website FAQs about R&P. This makes it sound like you wouldn't see big chunks of deposits in the oil filter, but the deposits cleaned away could still be large enough for an efficient filter to catch, so the filter should not be used longer than on a normal OCI.And you got to think about the 4 OCIs to work. Like they said they do not want to overload the filters and send them into bypass. This is a mass market product.
I'm just specifically referring to his screenshots that show a concerted and well planned marketing effort (which there is nothing wrong with).Cheese puffs take is not about marketing - he’s basically saying it’s a con job whilst knowing nothing about it - nor LSJ intentions …
So, it looks like I did not find the right patents for this product. But the two patent applications that I did find (both titled "Lubricant for preventing and removing carbon deposits in internal combustion engines") prove that Valvoline has been doing R&D and filing for patents in this area for over a decade, so this is not a hoax thought up by the marketing department as some on this board appear to suspect. Also, LSJR's video showed that they have a pretty impressive test lab. So it appears to me that they have put effort into the science, modeling, experiments, testing, and patenting, and are proud about what they have come up with. How well it works in the real world is yet to be seen, as they admitted in LSJR's video.
This is getting good; I am sure there is a logical Explanation.It doesn't appear that Valvoline has filed any patents pertaining to their mysterious wunder molecule.
Patents Assigned to Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC - Justia Patents Search
Justia - Patents - Patents and Patent Application Resourcespatents.justia.com
A seemingly positive note on this is that Valvoline appears to have spent and are spending on R&D and not a fortune on expensive Television commericals. Now can anyone answer: Did the Valvoline company sell out entirely or sell part of their business in the lastSo, it looks like I did not find the right patents for this product. But the two patent applications that I did find (both titled "Lubricant for preventing and removing carbon deposits in internal combustion engines") prove that Valvoline has been doing R&D and filing for patents in this area for over a decade, so this is not a hoax thought up by the marketing department as some on this board appear to suspect. Also, LSJR's video showed that they have a pretty impressive test lab. So it appears to me that they have put effort into the science, modeling, experiments, testing, and patenting, and are proud about what they have come up with. How well it works in the real world is yet to be seen, as they admitted in LSJR's video.
A seemingly positive note on this is that Valvoline appears to have spent and are spending on R&D and not a fortune on expensive Television commericals. Now can anyone answer: Did the Valvoline company sell out entirely or sell part of their business in the last
couple of years? I heard they did but only saw something about a type of business re-organization that could mean just about anything,
Thanks for a rational thinking post. Much appreciated. If brand xyz says it can clean people believe it, if brand ytq says it can clean, it's marketing. Ok.So, it looks like I did not find the right patents for this product. But the two patent applications that I did find (both titled "Lubricant for preventing and removing carbon deposits in internal combustion engines") prove that Valvoline has been doing R&D and filing for patents in this area for over a decade, so this is not a hoax thought up by the marketing department as some on this board appear to suspect. Also, LSJR's video showed that they have a pretty impressive test lab. So it appears to me that they have put effort into the science, modeling, experiments, testing, and patenting, and are proud about what they have come up with. How well it works in the real world is yet to be seen, as they admitted in LSJR's video.
Cheese puffs take is not about marketing - he’s basically saying it’s a con job whilst knowing nothing about it - nor LSJ intentions …
Two possibilities:It doesn't appear that Valvoline has filed any patents pertaining to their mysterious wunder molecule.
Patents Assigned to Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC - Justia Patents Search
Justia - Patents - Patents and Patent Application Resourcespatents.justia.com
What if it’s called “lubricant composition containing ashless TBN molecules” - 2 for Valvoline (2022 & 2023) and one of the names is IndianTwo possibilities:
- They may have filed it under a different corporate identity such as a subsidiary or their parent company.
- They may have decided to protect is as a trade secret, thereby avoiding telling their competitors exactly what it is. Or they may want to protect it for more than 20 years. Or they may want to protect it from competitors in areas of the world where patent protection is not very strong. Or all of these.