I know some do shorter and some longer, but does 7500-9000 miles sound about right in a new Honda with M1 or GC? Shorter would mean like 6000 and longer would mean what...12,000 miles? Sooo???
quote:What does Honda say? I have it's 1st cousin, an Acura TL and the dealer told me the OLM will call for a change between 5k and 10k miles on Dino, no brownie points for synth. If Honda is giving you similar numbers, start off changing it when Honda recommends and do what the UOA tells you if you want to play games with warranty coverage.
Originally posted by Auto-Union: I know some do shorter and some longer, but does 7500-9000 miles sound about right in a new Honda with M1 or GC? Shorter would mean like 6000 and longer would mean what...12,000 miles? Sooo???
quote:
Originally posted by Auto-Union: ... does 7500-9000 miles sound about right in a new Honda with M1 or GC?
quote:What a pot of garbage! I hope you are kidding. Please show me these UOA's? Oh there might be one or two when something was wrong with the car, but almost every long OCI posted does NOT show INCREASED wear. You use the word "damage" - please use some evidence! 10K mile OCI with a good synthetic in a good engine is easy and very doable.
Come on ... don't you want your car to last? Look at the numbers in the UOA section on long OCI's, the wear numbers are always high. I honestly don't understand the reasoning behind long OCI's. To save money you say? Or "let's not waste perfectly good oil." Or how about this one: "run it out to 10K and do a UOA." When the damage is already done folks, a UOA is NOT going to bring the engine back to where it was. Go 5000 miles on your favorite 5W-20 blend and take care of the car.
quote:10K miles on a good synthetic like Mobil 1 is a piece of cake. I used M1 from the time it came out, back in the 70's I believe, until I retired a few years ago and quit driving so much. It was said to be good for 1 year or 25,000 miles, so I changed it once a year, usually at 19- or 20,000 miles. Somewhere along the way, Mobil had trouble with people who would not check their oil level and ruined their engines, and dropped the 25,000 mile advertising claim. I kept changing it once a year, and never had any oil related problem. I do not keep my cars forever; about 7 years and 140,000 miles was my limit. The engines were always quiet and smooth with this mileage on them. One thing I cannot figure out is why this new M1 EP is only good for 15,000 miles.
Originally posted by Pablo:quote:What a pot of garbage! I hope you are kidding. Please show me these UOA's? Oh there might be one or two when something was wrong with the car, but almost every long OCI posted does NOT show INCREASED wear. You use the word "damage" - please use some evidence! 10K mile OCI with a good synthetic in a good engine is easy and very doable.
Come on ... don't you want your car to last? Look at the numbers in the UOA section on long OCI's, the wear numbers are always high. I honestly don't understand the reasoning behind long OCI's. To save money you say? Or "let's not waste perfectly good oil." Or how about this one: "run it out to 10K and do a UOA." When the damage is already done folks, a UOA is NOT going to bring the engine back to where it was. Go 5000 miles on your favorite 5W-20 blend and take care of the car.
quote:Clyde: You know, it's one thing to simply decline to back up your statements with facts. It's another thing entirely to misrepresent the facts. You stated, "Look at the numbers in the UOA section on long OCI's, the wear numbers are always high." This is simply false. See the selection of UOAs I've linked below. All are UOAs in cars with OCIs at 7500 miles or more, and all are perfectly good and showing no signs of damage or even danger. An '03 Camry running M1 to 9500 miles, good results. A VW Golf running GC for about 7500 miles, great results. My own G35 on GC at 7100 (not quite 7500...) barely showing any wear at all... A 2001 Toyota Avalon, 13500 miles on Amsoil S2k, outstanding results. A 2000 Olds Intrigue running Amsoil S2k for 13000 miles, slightly high Fe, not bad for miles, all else great. A V-8 Tundra running M1EP for over 8000 miles, wear almost non-existent. A Ford Explorer running Amsoil S2k for 24000 miles, nothing amiss here... A Turbo Saab 9-3 running M1 0w-40 for 17000 miles, great results. An Accord 4-cyl w/ over 100k miles running 5w-20 dino for 9200 miles!!! Toyota Sequoia (mine) running GC for 13 months & 10,200 miles, wear almost non-existent. Well, do I need to go on? There are plenty more just like the ten above, right here on BITOG. Am I missing something? Pretty clearly, all these cars, and in fact dozens and dozens more here on BITOG are doing fine on these longer OCIs. Wear numbers are NOT always high, and these cars all seem to be living long, happy lives.
Originally posted by Clyde65: Come on ... don't you want your car to last? Look at the numbers in the UOA section on long OCI's, the wear numbers are always high. I honestly don't understand the reasoning behind long OCI's. (...snip...)