Cleveland Browns..It's like asking who your favorite football team is
I agree with OP. I see it on the Hyundai forums. Now I'm new here, but even on YT, TT and FB theres people saying "oil is cheap, engines are not, I run Full Synthetic and change every 3k" like bro c'mon. That just seems excessive. I'm not far off myself, changing at every 4k miles, but that's my normal OCI cut in half because my driving style apparently necessitates a "severe service" OCI, per the manual and guidance from sid forum users.
but best believe, I would go longer if I could. But when you have an engine (Theta II) that is as notorious as mine for seizures/failure, oil consumption, carbon deposits, and dilution, among other things.
What cars?I don't understand, especially guys on this site that purchase these cars. We should certainly know better.
Hyundai's and Kia's with the Theta engines. Gotta read the thread ya knowWhat cars?
His confusion arose from your quoting ankther user's post in one of your posts while adding no information, then following with a second post with a sentence that makes it look like you're replying to nothing. Gotta learn how to properly operate forum software and use the 'quote' feature, ya know?Hyundai's and Kia's with the Theta engines. Gotta read the thread ya know
This has me wondering. I know a lot of you are changing at 5K, some are crazy enough to do it at 3k because it's still 1975 in your garage. What's really wrong with going 10k, 12k or 15k on the oil/filter if the manufacturer says so and so does the oil analysis places (I've seen some 15k high mileage OCI analysis has had Blackstone noting to try even longer...) say it's okay too?
So I figured, all things considered, if I kept changing every 9000 miles, does it even matter what I use? Why not go longer?
It's not always about the oil or filter quality, but oil dilution on today's direct injected engines seem to ruin the oil before it would otherwise go bad.Actually, I said "about everyone" as most people on here strongly advocate 5,000 OCI.
I haven't seen many debates on changing OCI based on oil brand, for example. So if OCI remains constant, why does oil brand matter? If the additive packages make a big difference, why not longer OCI to utilize it?
And you are who? All he had to do was follow the thread. Proxy spokesman.His confusion arose from your quoting ankther user's post in one of your posts while adding no information, then following with a second post with a sentence that makes it look like you're replying to nothing. Gotta learn how to properly operate forum software and use the 'quote' feature, ya know?![]()
If you're going to imply someone else is an imbecile, then turns out is fair play, friend. No biggie.And you are who? All he had to do was follow the thread. Proxy spokesman.
Please accept my condolences.Cleveland Browns..
Is your budget so cost constrained that you're going to long OCIs on your BMW or Acura to keep cost per mile equivalent? If not, it's a false comparison.If I really drill down, the math is crazy:
For the cost per mile to be the same it'd be 14,100 miles on M1 EP vs 9,000 miles on Kirkland/Warren. I'd wager just about everyone here would rather use Kirkland/Warren and change at 9,000 miles, right? Even still, maybe going longer on M1 EP would have me changing the oil less often...
Sludge/varnish accumulation over time would be a concern I would have with extended OCI.Honestly not trying to stir stuff up, just hear me out.
Regardless of the oil brand or duration, most of the 'I sent my oil in for analysis' posts result in the same conclusion: "I could have gone longer." So, I simply ask, why not?
My last car was a 2001 BMW 330xi and I had it for 14 years. I used to only buy dealer oil ("nothing but the best for my baby" type thinking) and Mann oil filters, when BMW switched their oil supplier I figured "if they can switch, so can I," and went to Mobil 1 0W-40 Euro because it was LL-01 approved. Some time ago that M1 oil lost the LL-01 certification, I didn't know what to do so I just kept using it.
My 330xi took SEVEN QUARTS of oil, so I was completely fine with longer OCI. The oil service minder reset at 15,525 miles. Since the car took so much oil I changed it every 10k. Later on I just drove it until the car told me the oil service was due.
Now I have an Acura TL (4.5 quarts). I've been using Mobil 1 Extended Performance 0W-20 and Fram Ultra Synthetic filter, replacing when the oil service minder goes off at 9,000 miles. Both the oil & filter say they're rated for 20k miles. Heck, even the user manual calls for changing the oil filter ever other oil change (I do it every time).
This has me wondering. I know a lot of you are changing at 5K, some are crazy enough to do it at 3k because it's still 1975 in your garage. What's really wrong with going 10k, 12k or 15k on the oil/filter if the manufacturer says so and so does the oil analysis places (I've seen some 15k high mileage OCI analysis has had Blackstone noting to try even longer...) say it's okay too?
What flared this up was some recent deals I've seen going on:
$24.29 5qt M1 0W-20 EP (Sold as 3 pack @ $72.88)
$22.29 5qt M1 0W-20 AFE (Sold as 3 pack @ $66.88)
$15.50 5qt Kirkland 0W-20 (Warren Full Synthetic sold as 2 pack @ $30.99)
$14.48 5qt Pennzoil 0W-20 Platinum (Not Ultra, after $25 rebate shenanigans buying 2 pack @ $26.98 each)
If I really drill down, the math is crazy:
For the cost per mile to be the same it'd be 14,100 miles on M1 EP vs 9,000 miles on Kirkland/Warren. I'd wager just about everyone here would rather use Kirkland/Warren and change at 9,000 miles, right? Even still, maybe going longer on M1 EP would have me changing the oil less often...
So I figured, all things considered, if I kept changing every 9000 miles, does it even matter what I use? Why not go longer?
Any thoughts other than "oil cheap, engines expensive, ooga booga!"
Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.![]()