Nothing, but it has different requirements. My point is that a lot of hp does not mean anything when it comes to oil requirements.And technology assures us of what? A "better" engine???? There are a lot of engines that truly are high-tech and wonderful. Some of them are very reliable. Others, not so much. The BMX 4.4L for example ... The Hot Vee engines seem great, until they start to fail, cost an arm/leg to fix, and make troubleshooting very difficult.
I'm not saying high-tech engines are all bad; that's clearly not true. But high-tech does not assure anything other than it's different from the lower-tech alternatives. High-tech does not have sole ownership of high-power, nor high-reliablility; those can be found with lesser-tech choices.
If you need a powerful engine in a power-dense package, then you're pretty much have to rely on some form of forced induction to get you there, or ultra-high rpm. Both of those are going to have a fairly robust tech package to support the requirements. But that choice of power in a limited space package also brings challenges that are likely to compromise it's reliability.
So if power density is the primary goal, tech can help get you there. But not without compromises elsewhere. If you desire other things over power density (say reliability and/or cost containment), then tech often ain't the right choice.
Still would go any BMW N63 over Chrysler product.