Old UPDATE I simply copied what I posted a couple weeks ago:
The first fill up and did some figures. So after a week of driving almost exactly the way, i.e. work and home and shopping I filled the tank and did some math!
This fill up only gained roughly .70 increase in mpg. I was hoping for more but this is as I said the first tankful and to do a real assessment I should calculate it over a month of driving.
There was the AC service which I had the engine idling off and on while servicing it for about 30 minutes which can reduce MPG,
Here is things I noted, I do want to say that here in CA where I live the average ambient for last week were in the low 100F's.
IAT were about 20F higher then ambient, timing actually increased surprisingly higher then what I thought the Mazda ECU programming was set for. In other words in the 3 years I have owned and monitored the timing I have never seen the numbers as high? Because I used the AC more often then normal the radiated heat soak was higher but the the bottle with the 50/50 mix was notably cooler. That would be expected because of the properties of methanol when it is vaporized. Although it may be my "butt" Dyno the engine felt like it had crisper throttle response. I know it arguable at this point. hahaha! I will say but I did not pay attention to but will in the future but the last couple days I started to watch my throttle % use, and I noticed I have been using less then normal but attaining the same MPH. I did not check the spark plugs because I seemed to have misplaced my Mazda supply of them in my garage, so that will come later.
All in all the project went fine and I am so far happy that at least it seems like there is some improvements. When I scope the engine again at the next engine oil service and spark plug change I will know if the main reason for this project was to clean the intake valves and combustion chambers?
Things to mention TODAY:
Yes I have a baseline power sheet that I do follow up and set the exact Delta's before running it up on the DYNO
It does show a slight increase but nothing worth mentioning but we did 4 runs that resulted in exact numbers.
Since I finished the project I now have more MPG data and it still looks in a plus margin and still seems to be increasing? I just need more miles maybe a couple of months to really look at the number from 3 years of my information about MPG
This was my project not my idea but I did re-engineer and rethink its original use and design to what I thought would be a better mouse trap so to say in the end I think I made it much better then the original designer did.
I did scope the engine before this project to see the extent of carbon deposits and did another yesterday. The inside of my tail pipes look like the muffler new out of the box so you can imagine what the intake and combustion chambers look like now..
I am not running lean. I examined the spark plugs again today after a power pull and they were ideal, as well I constantly monitor ECU systems like timing, temperatures and sensor values. No DTCs and my monitors are in readiness state so I think my engine may be carbon reduced if not carbon free at this time?
I am not going to offer this project in my Performance line of parts. This project was for me and for fun.
Please remember I have said this thread and my projects are for fun so respect that and understand I will not be conducting a technical Q&A about this project and its results. I will simply say again it seems to work for ME!