Someone got it. I was doing a customers truck yesterday that brought his own oil and had three quarts of this to add to his 2 gallons of TDT Mobil 1
Don’t the oil companies have to pay for the approvals?Really?
And, it is not licensing but approval.
They pay the $5k or whatever it is these days for the testing. Automakers don't receive a cut on the sale of oil with their approval on the bottle.Don’t the oil companies have to pay for the approvals?
Yes they do, it is around $5K (when I worked on VW504.00/507.00 oil testing VW charged 3,200 euros). Do you think that is a lot of money for Mobil1?Don’t the oil companies have to pay for the approvals?
Better XOM to answer the question, rather than one who's not valued at $236.06B.Yes they do, it is around $5K (when I worked on VW504.00/507.00 oil testing VW charged 3,200 euros). Do you think that is a lot of money for Mobil1?
I agree, but why not beating dead horse?Mobil1 5W40 FS x2: What is the point?
Edyvw: After reading this thread, the question still begs an adequate answer!
Outside of Mobil wanting to steal away unwitting customers, who the heck knows.
Lik I said, something does not add up. For M1 to get out on the market with oil that does not have MB229.5 is really, really strange.If to be based solely on VOAs, viscosimetry and base oils specified in MSDSs, Mobil1 FS x2 5W-40 is fully dentical to Mobil1 FS 5W-40, but there are rumors that x2 contains a zirconium based friction modifier and it has really good resistance to cavitation among 5W-40 ACEA A3/B3/B4 oils.
On the 5-40?Noted this weekend that this is now shown as "FS" on the bottle vs. "FSx2" on the bottle I have.
Yep.On the 5-40?
Here is the PDS downloadYes, and M1 doesn’t have pds, nothing about that oil. Weird.
Too bad it doesn’t have HTHS value, but I guess it is 3.7-3.8.