Originally Posted by rubberchicken
Originally Posted by TiGeo
^^^I agree with you - not sure why anyone would admit to abusing their car to a dealer when seeking warranty coverage?
Normally I would say you have a good point, but I suspect it was a combination of two things; the service writer was a pretty smooth talker, and he probably just slowly asked questions like a good detective, and eventually the guy implicated himself.
The owner is not mechanically inclined , and had never owned / operated a vehicle in cold weather. Although his English is perfect, he is not a native born speaker so he could have implicated himself. If he did not know what he was doing was wrong, why would he think he made a mistake ?
Originally Posted by rubberchicken
Originally Posted by TiGeo
^^^I agree with you - not sure why anyone would admit to abusing their car to a dealer when seeking warranty coverage?
Normally I would say you have a good point, but I suspect it was a combination of two things; the service writer was a pretty smooth talker, and he probably just slowly asked questions like a good detective, and eventually the guy implicated himself.
The owner is not mechanically inclined , and had never owned / operated a vehicle in cold weather. Although his English is perfect, he is not a native born speaker so he could have implicated himself. If he did not know what he was doing was wrong, why would he think he made a mistake ?
What I don't understand is why would the service writer care? Work is work and usually all they care about is they will get reimbursed by the manufacturer. If he submitted it as manufacturer defect would the manufacture ever question it?The end result would be new customer is happy, the work is paid for by manufacture and life goes on over something that would be a questionable denial of warranty. Thick oil and too heavy on the throttle while cold...seems like grasping to me. Lots of engines have been subjected to similar conditions with no issues.
While the manufacturer maybe within their rights to deny why create bad blood over something that most likely never happens? In other words it's not like this is going to cost the manufacturer significant coin unless it's widespread - in which case it is a manufacturing defect.