These, "Cars Cost Too Much", threads pop up from time to time. The biggest issue that seems to be overlooked, is higher cost does not directly translate into less affordability. Let's look at the numbers.
In 1970 the average new car costs $3,542.00. While the average yearly wage was $9,870.00.
https://www.google.com/search?sourc...iz.....6..35i39j0j0i131j0i10.xUhYxOuyPCg
https://www.google.com/search?ei=GE...304i39j33i10j0i7i30j0i8i7i30._yAX5lm0Sj0
48 years later in 2018 the average new car costs $35,285.00. While the average yearly wage rose to $59,055.00.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=3k...i10i30j0i8i7i30j0i8i30j33i10.pT_EbdLwfpc
https://www.google.com/search?ei=ik.......0i71j35i39j0j33i22i29i30.ifo_nQkwB74
So going by these rough averages, in 1970 the average new car costs around 35.8% of the average yearly income. Moving on to 2018 the average new car costs around 59.7% of that same yearly income. Or a relative increase of 23.9% in 48 years. But that's not a fair and realistic comparison. Because today's new cars are far better equipped than cars manufactured almost a half century ago. In 1970 if a new car had an automatic transmission, power steering, AM radio, and A/C, it was considered "loaded".
Today these same cars come standard with all of that, and whole lot more that's included in the base price. Like turn by turn navigation, power seats, windows, door locks, cruise control, back up cameras, much better trim, paint, upholstery, and instrumentation, and about a dozen other things I'm forgetting at the moment. So when all of that is factored into the equation, the additional 23.9% cost comes out to be much less.
Granted while I can understand that some people, (of which I am one), don't necessarily want, or enjoy being basically forced to pay for all that. It doesn't change the fact it does add increased value and desirability to the newer vehicles. So when everything is factored in, today's new cars aren't all that much more costly in relationship to everything else. Prices always go up over time. But fortunately so do incomes.
In 1970 the average new car costs $3,542.00. While the average yearly wage was $9,870.00.
https://www.google.com/search?sourc...iz.....6..35i39j0j0i131j0i10.xUhYxOuyPCg
https://www.google.com/search?ei=GE...304i39j33i10j0i7i30j0i8i7i30._yAX5lm0Sj0
48 years later in 2018 the average new car costs $35,285.00. While the average yearly wage rose to $59,055.00.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=3k...i10i30j0i8i7i30j0i8i30j33i10.pT_EbdLwfpc
https://www.google.com/search?ei=ik.......0i71j35i39j0j33i22i29i30.ifo_nQkwB74
So going by these rough averages, in 1970 the average new car costs around 35.8% of the average yearly income. Moving on to 2018 the average new car costs around 59.7% of that same yearly income. Or a relative increase of 23.9% in 48 years. But that's not a fair and realistic comparison. Because today's new cars are far better equipped than cars manufactured almost a half century ago. In 1970 if a new car had an automatic transmission, power steering, AM radio, and A/C, it was considered "loaded".
Today these same cars come standard with all of that, and whole lot more that's included in the base price. Like turn by turn navigation, power seats, windows, door locks, cruise control, back up cameras, much better trim, paint, upholstery, and instrumentation, and about a dozen other things I'm forgetting at the moment. So when all of that is factored into the equation, the additional 23.9% cost comes out to be much less.
Granted while I can understand that some people, (of which I am one), don't necessarily want, or enjoy being basically forced to pay for all that. It doesn't change the fact it does add increased value and desirability to the newer vehicles. So when everything is factored in, today's new cars aren't all that much more costly in relationship to everything else. Prices always go up over time. But fortunately so do incomes.