Even if it doesn’t burn oil?
Yes, even if it doesn't burn oil. Ringland deposits are sort of like clogged arteries. Not really a problem...... until they are. Think of topping up your old engine like someone who is older and needs blood thinners to stay alive. It's best if you can avoid going down that path when younger with better lifestyle choices.
They both have a 0W winter rating. Fuel consumption during start and warmup is relatively insignificant. You’d never, ever observe a difference you could ascribe to the oil. No way.
Superior winter ratings aren’t there to save fuel when cold. Above the low maximum a 0W oil may be thicker than the corresponding 5W equivalent.
I hear what you are saying. a 0w30 is still more viscous than 0w16 at all stages of a full drive cycle or heat cycle if you will,
despite sharing, within range for a 0W, CCV and MRV specs.
Hear me out. The difference in fuel consumption is large between summer temps and winter temps, even on long trips where the engine is as warm as it can get.
If a 0w16 shifts the dynamic viscosity curve drastically in these much colder drive cycles like the KV40 and KV100 specs suggest they do, it should result in significantly decrease fuel consumption in the winter for my climate and for my shorter trips. Why wouldn't I at least try it, or a 0w20, next winter? I don't think I need to worry about HTHS in this engine in my winter climate.