Why not use Valvoline R&P as the "forever oil"?

This is a really interesting question actually, and it’s something that I have considered too. For me the biggest issue with using it long term is that it’s not sold in Canada and even when I cross the border it’s not easy to find in every Walmart and I don’t really want to pay $40 for it at the other parts stores.

But another reason is that it’s a bit more than M1 ESP, which has a lot better approvals on it and even if your car doesn’t need any of those it’s still a good indication of the quality of ESP.
Also, I know a lot of people here like to use a 0w30 or 0w40 and that’s something Valvoline doesn’t offer in R&P.

I think this is the main reason that I wouldn't use R&P as a "forever" oil. While R&P may be a very good oil for cleaning, there are other oils out there that have went to great effort to be formulated for, and obtain manufacturer approvals. And it most instances, these approved oils are no more expensive, often less expensive, than R&P. For me at least, a motor oil that has been formulated to meet or exceed manufacturer specifications, particularly one that is licensed/approved, will almost always be my first choice.
 
Let me preface this though experiment by stipulating that I understand the following:

1) R&P is not, or at least is not advertised, as an extended drain interval; let's assume a normie 5K-ish drain interval
2) R&P, currently, does not offer a wide selection of viscosities so if your vehicle requires a 0w40, here in the USA, R&P would be out; let's assume most cars require or recommend a 0w20 or 5w30 that R&P offers
3) R&P, currently, is not offered in the USA in Euro flavors

With those things stipulated, what arguments could be made that R&P is *not* a good consistent use/long term oil for most vehicles. At Walmart, it's part of the 5qt jug at approx $29 cadre, so why would one not select it. I'm making this argument in good faith; just curious if there is a reason it would not be the ideal choice for vehicles/use cases that don't fit the stipulations above.
That's an odd way to think of the question.

I have VRP in two vehicles now and frankly I'm impressed and the UOAs out there are also looking pretty good.

But I think the main argument to "not VRP the world" is that it's still a pretty new oil on the market. It might be that it has a weakness that hasn't shown up yet.
 
It is like asking why not deep clean your teeth every six months instead of only when the dentist says you have too much plaque under your gum. Can you use it sure, but will it benefit you if your engine is clean enough to outlast the rest of your car or before you trade it in?
 
I don’t think I’d be comfortable using a “cleaning” type product/oil all the time, or at least until this product has been out a little longer. The longterm effects are still somewhat unknown right now.

Not saying this will happen at all, but can we be certain longterm use doesn’t breakdown soft seals more rapidly overtime.
 
Why use it from new? I’m genuinely curious. What’s the advantage over another synthetic at the recommended intervals?
In all my previous cars, I was never actually aware of the oil the dealer or local mechanic used till I tried to tackle the GS350 oil burning issue last year. VRP was the first oil I actively bought and asked the mechanic to replace and it fixed the oil burning issue completely after just two changes covering 10K miles and I noticed no other problems when using it. So I figured, why not?

Now that I'm aware of BITOG and reading it regularly, I'm sure I'll be better informed if someone finds a weakness or problem with the oil. At that point, I'll decide on what to use next. Until then, no one has mentioned a reason not to use it.

PS - I always changed my oil at 3K in the past and 5K on the GS so I don't even intend to do extended OCIs at this point.
 
I don’t think I’d be comfortable using a “cleaning” type product/oil all the time, or at least until this product has been out a little longer. The longterm effects are still somewhat unknown right now.

Not saying this will happen at all, but can we be certain longterm use doesn’t breakdown soft seals more rapidly overtime.
Well it has to contain seal conditioners to meet API specifications. You could also argue seals would last longer bc they would stay cleaner, longer. But you raise a valid point.
 
I'm far from an expert, but if I recall correctly, the UOA I've seen on it seems to have a relatively low TBN after a 5K mile OCI so it appears the additive pack doesn't lend it self to long (10K+ miles) OCIs.
I am no expert whatsoever but I remember reading somewhere that tbn is not necessarily a variable by itself to determine oil longevity.
 
Why not? Those D**M sale threads with too much stuff in the oil stash already and still adding more because $2/qt of good full syn is just too much for my will power to handle.

Just like the Delo 5W-40 that went in my Accord yesterday. :ROFLMAO:

Also those approval things if you are worried about warranty and receipts etc.
 
At this point I'm more curious wth is in it that makes it work. I wonder if we'll ever find out....

They were very explicit with VPBR stating it contained significant group V to accomplish the cleaning. VRP is secret.
 
I’m wanting to run R&P in a Camry that sees a lot of Uber use, but Toyota “officially” sanctioned 0W-8/16 for it, but OKs 5W/10W-30 for the Mexican market and the A25A can use up to a 20W-50. I’ll wait for the drivetrain warranty to be up. R&P is available in 0W-20.
 
I'd say, go for it unless you're concerned with Owners Manual verbiage.
 
Last edited:
The regular price at the local auto parts stores is around USD $60, it’s too expensive to use foerever unless it can be picked up on sale.
 
Last edited:
In the USA, it is readily available at Walmart for $29.99 and other retailers advertise it close to that with a free filter. At this price point with it working as advertised, it makes a lot of sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom