The death of American footbal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Before this thread gets shut down. Grampi..you and I have seen the transition from a nation of people who loved their country (in spite of its many faults). Soldiers from G. Washington on who fought and gave their all would be depressed that a portion of the nation is so anti-patriotic.

We lived through the best times and we we appreciate what we have and what has been given us. Nothing can change that-for us.
 
Originally Posted by grampi
Originally Posted by greenjp
White guys who have never been pulled over for driving while black are ill equipped to intelligently comment on matters like the players' protests.



Disrespect to our national anthem/flag knows no skin color...

Are you willing to entertain some information that may cause you to reconsidered your opinion?

Colin Kaepernick elected to kneel during the anthem after discussing it with a Green Beret named Nate Boyer, who suggested that kneeling would be appropriate and not disrespectful of the military. This fit Kaepernick's objective as the subject of his protest is structural inequalities and not "the flag" or "the troops". To the contrary. By the way he donated $1,000,000 to charity last year, when he wasn't even on an NFL roster.

Good article about the Eagles' Malcolm Jenkins:
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/a...jenkinss-message-for-those-not-listening
You made a remark above that started "To listen to the kneelers..."; I've got the sense that you haven't actually done that. (Granted Jenkins' preferred symbol is a raised fist vs. kneeling but the point stands) By the way this occured in June, during the offseason that someone earlier remarked we don't see any such activity. So much for that.

Here's an interview with him:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/malcolm-jenkins-philadelphia-eagles/556886/

Sample question and answer:
"Q: To you, what do police accountability and transparency look like? What do you think you can reasonably accomplish?
A: It's pretty simple. If there's a shooting or something that didn't need to happen, we want law-enforcement officers to be held accountable, just like any other citizen would be. When there is corruption in a police department, we want [the department] to be held accountable. But at the same time, we don't want to isolate the police. It's not an attack on the police; we need to rebuild the relationship between our communities and law enforcement, rebuild that trust.

We've been interacting with this group out of Florida called rite [Racial Intelligence Training and Engagement] Academy. We're trying to figure out what the best practices are when it comes to training officers to engage in the community, to understand themselves and some of the trauma they've been going through, to make sure they can properly do their job and treat everybody with the same respect.

The police go through trauma, too. They're seeing victims, 16-year-old kids being shot—they see that, and before they can even process that and deal with that as a human being, they have to go on to the next call, and the next call, and the next call. Mental health is not something that they think about, or that they deal with as a department. So with the rite training, before officers even go out, they have to do a self-evaluation of where they are that day and know where their trigger points are. That's an approach I hadn't thought about, and I thought it was pretty brilliant."

Here's his statement (https://twitter.com/MalcolmJenkins/status/1004049505812172800) after the President mischaracterized what they're doing when he cancelled the White House visit after the Super Bowl.

If you can read this stuff and conclude that they're simplistically protesting "the flag" or "the anthem" then there's really nothing worth discussing.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by greenjp

Are you willing to entertain some information that may cause you to reconsidered your opinion?

Colin Kaepernick elected to kneel during the anthem after discussing it with a Green Beret named Nate Boyer, who suggested that kneeling would be appropriate and not disrespectful of the military. This fit Kaepernick's objective as the subject of his protest is structural inequalities and not "the flag" or "the troops". To the contrary. By the way he donated $1,000,000 to charity last year, when he wasn't even on an NFL roster.


Doesn't change a thing. The purpose of standing is to show your honor and respect of the country that has given you the right to express your feelings in any way you choose. The fact that 1 Green Beret came up with this hairbrainded idea when 99.999% of other soldiers disagree... says something. You will never understand or acknowledge that. So its your right. But you could never be my friend..and probably vice versa (yes I have some black friends) Birds of a feather flock together. BTW I have a daughter who served and 2 grandsons who are in the military. ..they will never "take a knee" One in Paris Island as I write this....giving his all..for folks like you.
 
Last edited:
Al you are a riot. "folks like you". And what would that be exactly? You know nothing about me aside from the fact that I've got an open mind on the subject at hand.

Food for thought - the "best times" you look back on fondly weren't "the best" for a whole lot of people.
 
Originally Posted by greenjp
Originally Posted by grampi
Originally Posted by greenjp
White guys who have never been pulled over for driving while black are ill equipped to intelligently comment on matters like the players' protests.



Disrespect to our national anthem/flag knows no skin color...

Are you willing to entertain some information that may cause you to reconsidered your opinion?

Colin Kaepernick elected to kneel during the anthem after discussing it with a Green Beret named Nate Boyer, who suggested that kneeling would be appropriate and not disrespectful of the military. This fit Kaepernick's objective as the subject of his protest is structural inequalities and not "the flag" or "the troops". To the contrary. By the way he donated $1,000,000 to charity last year, when he wasn't even on an NFL roster.

Good article about the Eagles' Malcolm Jenkins:
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/a...jenkinss-message-for-those-not-listening
You made a remark above that started "To listen to the kneelers..."; I've got the sense that you haven't actually done that. (Granted Jenkins' preferred symbol is a raised fist vs. kneeling but the point stands) By the way this occured in June, during the offseason that someone earlier remarked we don't see any such activity. So much for that.

Here's an interview with him:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/05/malcolm-jenkins-philadelphia-eagles/556886/

Sample question and answer:
"Q: To you, what do police accountability and transparency look like? What do you think you can reasonably accomplish?
A: It's pretty simple. If there's a shooting or something that didn't need to happen, we want law-enforcement officers to be held accountable, just like any other citizen would be. When there is corruption in a police department, we want [the department] to be held accountable. But at the same time, we don't want to isolate the police. It's not an attack on the police; we need to rebuild the relationship between our communities and law enforcement, rebuild that trust.

We've been interacting with this group out of Florida called rite [Racial Intelligence Training and Engagement] Academy. We're trying to figure out what the best practices are when it comes to training officers to engage in the community, to understand themselves and some of the trauma they've been going through, to make sure they can properly do their job and treat everybody with the same respect.

The police go through trauma, too. They're seeing victims, 16-year-old kids being shot—they see that, and before they can even process that and deal with that as a human being, they have to go on to the next call, and the next call, and the next call. Mental health is not something that they think about, or that they deal with as a department. So with the rite training, before officers even go out, they have to do a self-evaluation of where they are that day and know where their trigger points are. That's an approach I hadn't thought about, and I thought it was pretty brilliant."

Here's his statement (https://twitter.com/MalcolmJenkins/status/1004049505812172800) after the President mischaracterized what they're doing when he cancelled the White House visit after the Super Bowl.

If you can read this stuff and conclude that they're simplistically protesting "the flag" or "the anthem" then there's really nothing worth discussing.



My argument isn't that these people don't have a reason to protest. My argument is they are directing their protest at the wrong thing. Protesting the national anthem/flag has nothing to do with police wrongfully treating suspects, or innocent people belonging to certain ethnic groups. If they want to protest against police, then they should be organizing peaceful protests outside of police stations. What they're currently doing is the same as me flipping off the president, but then claiming I mean no disrespect to him personally, I'm am just protesting against his policies...
 
Originally Posted by Al
Before this thread gets shut down. Grampi..you and I have seen the transition from a nation of people who loved their country (in spite of its many faults). Soldiers from G. Washington on who fought and gave their all would be depressed that a portion of the nation is so anti-patriotic.

We lived through the best times and we we appreciate what we have and what has been given us. Nothing can change that-for us.


What gets me about these people who hate this country so much is why do they continue to live here. If this country is so terrible, why don't they move to another country? I think we both know the answer to that...
 
Originally Posted by greenjp
Al you are a riot. "folks like you". And what would that be exactly? You know nothing about me aside from the fact that I've got an open mind on the subject at hand.

Food for thought - the "best times" you look back on fondly weren't "the best" for a whole lot of people.


I think he means people like you who have no patriotism...we may not know much about you, but we do know you agree with those who choose to disrespect our country...
 
grampi you've got it all wrong. I have patriotism. Real patriotism, not the bogus kind extolled by some. Part of that patriotism is the acknowledgement that the country does not, and never has, fully live up to the ideals of the founding fathers. So yes I support the right of people to speak out about those failures. You're so hung up on the timing of the protest that you're unable to consider the substance of it - I guess that makes it easier for you not to face the issues being raised.

From Malcolm Jenkins' statement I linked above, which I'm pretty sure you didn't bother to read:
(on the subject of why players are speaking out and donating their time and money to social justice causes) "We do it because we love this country and our communities. Everyone, regardless of race or socioeconomic status, deserves to be treated equally. We are fighting for racial and social equality." Are those the words of someone who thinks the country is terrible or disrespects it?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by greenjp
grampi you've got it all wrong. I have patriotism. Real patriotism, not the bogus kind extolled by some. Part of that patriotism is the acknowledgement that the country does not, and never has, fully lived up to the ideals of the founding fathers. So yes I support the right of people to speak out about those failures. You're so hung up on the timing of the protest that you're unable to consider the substance of it - I guess that makes it easier for you not to face the issues being raised.



Your dreams of a perfect world are unrealistic. That doesn't mean we can't strive to make things better, but protesting the national anthem is not the way to go about it...
 
grampi you pack so many logically fallacies into such short posts. Where did anyone share "dreams of a perfect world"? What are you talking about?

"...they should be organizing peaceful protests outside of police stations". You must have missed the fact that among the things these guys are doing is meeting with police departments, participating in ride alongs and community outreach efforts, etc. It's all there if you're willing to inform yourself.

I agree we can and should strive to make things better. That starts with acknowledging the problems and continues with informing and educating people that they exist. Protest by it's nature has to be somewhat disruptive in order to be effective. It seems the protests during the anthem are doing that pretty well.
 
No need for me to re-respond to him grampi. Its obvious you and I know how we feel about ourselves and him. I hope this ends the back and forth. And thank you for your service.
34.gif
 
Originally Posted by Al
No need for me to re-respond to him grampi. Its obvious you and I know how we feel about ourselves and him. I hope this ends the back and forth. And thank you for your service.
34.gif


You're welcome!
 
Originally Posted by greenjp
grampi you pack so many logically fallacies into such short posts. Where did anyone share "dreams of a perfect world"? What are you talking about?

"...they should be organizing peaceful protests outside of police stations". You must have missed the fact that among the things these guys are doing is meeting with police departments, participating in ride alongs and community outreach efforts, etc. It's all there if you're willing to inform yourself.

I agree we can and should strive to make things better. That starts with acknowledging the problems and continues with informing and educating people that they exist. Protest by it's nature has to be somewhat disruptive in order to be effective. It seems the protests during the anthem are doing that pretty well.



I fail to see how unrinating people off advances their cause...meeting with police departments is good, disrespecting the national anthem is not...
 
Originally Posted by Al
The fact that 1 Green Beret came up with this hairbrainded idea when 99.999% of other soldiers disagree couldn't care less... says something.

Fixed that for you.

I personally don't care. Let them kneel, let them have their protest. Stop playing the national anthem for all I care! Put an end to all the half-hearted "patriotism."

Most are just feigning anger to enforce their paper-thin notions of what it means to be a patriot. Others are just tired of "those durn libruls" and want their NFL left alone.
 
Originally Posted by Dallas69
I don't care about what the players thoughts are on issues.
I don't want to see or hear politics during a game.
Most of them can't speak a complete sentence if their life depends on it.
Take football away from them and what do they have?
Many would end up on the wrong side of the law.
Just shut up and play.Protest on your own time,not at work.



^^^ THIS
 
Originally Posted by Dallas69
I don't care about what the players thoughts are on issues.
I don't want to see or hear politics during a game.
Most of them can't speak a complete sentence if their life depends on it.
Take football away from them and what do they have?
Many would end up on the wrong side of the law.
Just shut up and play.Protest on your own time,not at work.


A lot of them end up on the wrong side of the law even WITH football...good post!
 
You'd "protest" during say a memorial service or funeral too right??

Time and place matter a whole lot at times... A whole lot.

We have lost that sense of timing, decency and honor in this stupid country anymore.

You don't want to have hear someone else's "ideas" say after you just had surgery right?? Or do you want them "protesting" while at work in a hospital right??

Yeah I doubt it. And I don't care to hear anyone's "ideas" while they are at work. I don't share mine either. Time and place..
 
Originally Posted by rooflessVW
Originally Posted by Al
The fact that 1 Green Beret came up with this hairbrainded idea when 99.999% of other soldiers disagree couldn't care less... says something.

Fixed that for you.

I personally don't care. Let them kneel, let them have their protest. Stop playing the national anthem for all I care! Put an end to all the half-hearted "patriotism."

Most are just feigning anger to enforce their paper-thin notions of what it means to be a patriot. Others are just tired of "those durn libruls" and want their NFL left alone.



Hey man... Let me tell you something...

I don't want to hear ANYONE talk about their stupid "ideas" ... Whether they be way over here or way over there.... It's not the time nor place for this nonsense. No matter WHO is pushing an agenda. It's just no place or time for that to be done.


By the way... After a person shot and killed police officers in Dallas... the team wanted to put something on their jerseys in remembering them... And the NFL said NO... So.... If the NFL won't allow that... Then why allow these World Champions of small intellect to do what they were doing??? Yeah... That's garbage.
 
Last edited:
I don't think a guy kneeling is auditable
So you didn't have to hear anything while it was done.

And a football game sure as [censored] isnt anything sacred or close to a funeral and I have seen protests at churches.


Reading this thread it sounds as if a guy kneeling is the greatest human tragedy, a day that shall live in infamy, Jesus would vomit in rage at such a site, angels cried, millions died, no one shall ever recover, it is impossible to go on after seeing this?
People are addressing this like a religion.

I'm sure there are no more important issues to address in the country than this right?

In the 60's people were burning flags, were those better times?

We are going down the path of radicalization where individual people have lost their ability to think critically and elevate the importance of things they see to rediculous levels.

Your letting the mere site of a black guy kneeling affect your day to day life, sounds pretty stupid.

It's unfortunate that we live in a world looking to be offended assuming that the car a person drives is political, the oil he uses is political, his race is political, police are political, a persons cloths are political , apparently gender is political and death is political.


Also their "protest" wasnt even intended to be politics and I'm guessing if you didn't actively seek out info you wouldn't know why You saw it or what they were doing, probably didn't know what to think either.

Most people who think like you, look the same, act the same, believe the same and everybody who doesn't isn't on your team right?
"They" don't have a right to live here because they disagree with your politics/religion?

A good Christian would not think that way.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom