Restore and protect opinions

Put R&P in 2019 Sonata 2.4 I just bought. It had 23K miles on it and recent oil change. I Immediately swapped in R&P.
2K miles later not a single drop of oil consumed. I don't have any history on the car prior other than servicing intervals, so prior consumption is unknown.
Not trying to be rude, but that does not support R&P's case whatsoever.

You had no history of oil consumption. And you claim there is still none.
The vehicle only has 23K on it so without pulling at least the valve covers we're to assume that it's fairly clean and doesn't need R&P. Try back with a car with good amount of sludge, varnish, sticky piston rings, and/or excessive mileage.
 
Not trying to be rude, but that does not support R&P's case whatsoever.

You had no history of oil consumption. And you claim there is still none.
The vehicle only has 23K on it so without pulling at least the valve covers we're to assume that it's fairly clean and doesn't need R&P. Try back with a car with good amount of sludge, varnish, sticky piston rings, and/or excessive mileage.
It’s called “INPUT” ….take it for what it’s worth. These cars are notorious for burning oil.
 
I just did an oil change with R&P 5w30 in my accord just because I wanted to. Little over 86K miles on car. Will do an oil/filter change with it again to get the “double flush” before winter really hits up here and do a test on that sample in the summer.

It was around $10 more than what I normally use but I can afford the extra $20 or so a year
 
This isn't a flush product that I think many are expecting. You need to run the oil at least one full OCI, maybe more. They could have designed it to be more aggressive, but that would be a disaster for end user.

"I had never seen anything like it before, and I have eight years at Valvoline and 16 years at a company that makes the additives used in oil formulation.”

"Real-world testing is crucial. For instance, a Ford Mustang was subjected to extensive testing with Restore and Protect, showing significant reductions in wear and deposit formation. The testing extended to various engine components, including the timing chain cover, oil pan, and valvetrain, demonstrating the comprehensive benefits of the oil. The team also ran Restore and Protect in a Ford Explorer with more than 500,000 miles.

“And we also did a chassis dynamometer test where we put a vehicle on rollers basically and ran it 300,000 miles,” Warholic says. “Restore and Protect actually cleaned up the entire engine.”



https://www.enginebuildermag.com/2024/06/dealing-with-deposits-to-boost-engine-life/

1725538222146.jpg
 
Last edited:
This isn't a flush product that I think many are expecting. You need to run the oil at least one full OCI, maybe more. They could have designed it to be more aggressive, but that would be a disaster for end user.

"Real-world testing is crucial. For instance, a Ford Mustang was subjected to extensive testing with Restore and Protect, showing significant reductions in wear and deposit formation. The testing extended to various engine components, including the timing chain cover, oil pan, and valvetrain, demonstrating the comprehensive benefits of the oil. The team also ran Restore and Protect in a Ford Explorer with more than 500,000 miles.

“And we also did a chassis dynamometer test where we put a vehicle on rollers basically and ran it 300,000 miles,” Warholic says. “Restore and Protect actually cleaned up the entire engine.”



https://www.enginebuildermag.com/2024/06/dealing-with-deposits-to-boost-engine-life/

View attachment 238846
Well the “double flush” that I was referring to was to run the R&P for an oci, then run it again for another oci then run a sample on that so as to not potentially skew the results by having a different brand oil in there.
 
Well the “double flush” that I was referring to was to run the R&P for an oci, then run it again for another oci then run a sample on that so as to not potentially skew the results by having a different brand oil in there.
Makes sense. I think people are expecting this product to act like a flush when it's not designed to work that way at all.
 
i use this stuff extensively. it has been part of the help to stop 1 of my accords from burning oil completely and the other has been slowing down considerably and reduced smoking. i like to couple this stuff with HPL EC30. the ultimate cleaning setup.
 
i use this stuff extensively. it has been part of the help to stop 1 of my accords from burning oil completely and the other has been slowing down considerably and reduced smoking. i like to couple this stuff with HPL EC30. the ultimate cleaning setup.
Nice. Thanks for sharing your experience with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4WD
Has anybody actually run this long enough yet to see legitimate decreasing of oil consumption in an engine with sticking rings/low compression?
 
I just did an oil change with R&P 5w30 in my accord just because I wanted to. Little over 86K miles on car. Will do an oil/filter change with it again to get the “double flush” before winter really hits up here and do a test on that sample in the summer.

It was around $10 more than what I normally use but I can afford the extra $20 or so a year
Preach it brother.

Almost everyone here that changes their own oil has a preference and even though many people here will mercilessly pound you over the head with data that shows that "my oil is the best oil" - at the end of the day their preferred oil is preferred because they WANT IT.

See how I made the word 'almost' really big and bold? Also the word 'many' - if you aren't one of the almost and many, then this doesn't apply to you and you don't need to launch a diatribe telling me WHY YOUR OIL IS THE BEST. Peace. I still have some pitchforks and torches for sale if you want to storm my castle.
 
Back
Top Bottom