gathermewool
Site Donor 2023
Originally Posted By: lipadj46
Originally Posted By: gathermewool
The oil turning black doesn't indicate that it's holding an inordinate amount of "dirt" or particulates; it's chemistry, and the color, IMO, is a product of so many things that's it's unreliable as an idicator. If you've got something to counter with, please do. Sarcastic questions don't really get us anywhere.
What's the difference between him running an oil in the old truck with its own contaminants in suspension and the contaminants from another, newer, cleaner engine? If the truck came back with wear, TBN, TAN and all other attributes indicating that the change interval could be extended, then what's to say that those same indications in an oil from his newer car wouldn't mean that it woud be safe to run it in the truck's sump?
There are additives in oil to surround and hold particles (products of combustion) in suspension. Those particles can easily fall out of a still solution as they are not soluble in the oil itself. Its just basic chemistry, not everything in used oil is wear metals and additives.
Those soluble particles are neutralized and, IMO, wouldn't hamper the oil's ability to do its job for another few thousand miles in an old truck. The point is, the soluble particles are just that, soluble. If there were chunks floating around, they'd be transported to the filter.
My argument still stands: what's the diff between him running the oil longer in the car - the car he would extend his interval on if it weren't for the warranty - and finishing that interval in the truck? In other words, if 3kmi more in his car was justifiable by UOA, then why wouldn't dumping that used oil into his truck for 3kmi be acceptable?
pfft snobs.
Originally Posted By: gathermewool
The oil turning black doesn't indicate that it's holding an inordinate amount of "dirt" or particulates; it's chemistry, and the color, IMO, is a product of so many things that's it's unreliable as an idicator. If you've got something to counter with, please do. Sarcastic questions don't really get us anywhere.
What's the difference between him running an oil in the old truck with its own contaminants in suspension and the contaminants from another, newer, cleaner engine? If the truck came back with wear, TBN, TAN and all other attributes indicating that the change interval could be extended, then what's to say that those same indications in an oil from his newer car wouldn't mean that it woud be safe to run it in the truck's sump?
There are additives in oil to surround and hold particles (products of combustion) in suspension. Those particles can easily fall out of a still solution as they are not soluble in the oil itself. Its just basic chemistry, not everything in used oil is wear metals and additives.
Those soluble particles are neutralized and, IMO, wouldn't hamper the oil's ability to do its job for another few thousand miles in an old truck. The point is, the soluble particles are just that, soluble. If there were chunks floating around, they'd be transported to the filter.
My argument still stands: what's the diff between him running the oil longer in the car - the car he would extend his interval on if it weren't for the warranty - and finishing that interval in the truck? In other words, if 3kmi more in his car was justifiable by UOA, then why wouldn't dumping that used oil into his truck for 3kmi be acceptable?
pfft snobs.