I just got a call from some independent marketing firm asking about my recent contact with the "Toyota Customer Experience." At first I said just put down the absolute minimum possible score for each question. That didn't fly and after the opening questions (the guy was following a script) he said OK so in order to help Toyota improve their customer satisfaction I am going to ask you some more questions.
I stopped him right there and said, wait, what, the purpose of this interview is to help Toyota? The man kept his composure and said yes, it's to help Toyota and all their future customers.
I quickly explained to him that I harbor such enmity towards Toyota that I will never be a customer of theirs in the future. Since at best continued conversation would amount to me subsidizing people who hold views dissimilar to mine, I terminated the conversation.
I guess if I really wanted to get them, I could have given everybody glowing reviews, especially the service writers. But I am not a hurter; simply a help-withholder.
I wonder if there's a real moral difference
I stopped him right there and said, wait, what, the purpose of this interview is to help Toyota? The man kept his composure and said yes, it's to help Toyota and all their future customers.
I quickly explained to him that I harbor such enmity towards Toyota that I will never be a customer of theirs in the future. Since at best continued conversation would amount to me subsidizing people who hold views dissimilar to mine, I terminated the conversation.
I guess if I really wanted to get them, I could have given everybody glowing reviews, especially the service writers. But I am not a hurter; simply a help-withholder.
I wonder if there's a real moral difference