double vanos:
"Final analysis: Car manufacturers know what's best for cars vs a government agency."
I have a slightly different perspective on that. Europe is economically more inclined towards protectionism than the US. Protect industries/companies/economies/jobs as they exist now. Perhaps that shows up in the ability of corporate entities like the auto manufacturers to insist on proprietary maintenance regimens, lubricants and the like. On the contrary we in the US, fortunately I believe, have specific legal protections which encourage universal serviceability, with broad-spectrum oil grading being just one example.
Perhaps this is changing. BMW does not want to make it possible for an independent shop to work on your car, so they have proprietary software and even, I believe, proprietary hardware to make it virtually impossible for an indie to effectively talk to the computer on at least some late-model bimmers. This seems to me to be a pretty sneaky way to avoid fair competition for your business, and I'm sure it's not only BMW, and pretty confident that it's only the beginning of a trend. The incentive for any corporation to incrementally increase revenues through subtle behaviors that encourage or require existing customers to become recurring streams of income is powerful, and I believe that instances like these are among those in which our usually remarkable system of free-market enterprise needs to be tempered by a little bit of careful intervention (Moss-Magnuson intent, updated for the new century).
- Glenn
"Final analysis: Car manufacturers know what's best for cars vs a government agency."
I have a slightly different perspective on that. Europe is economically more inclined towards protectionism than the US. Protect industries/companies/economies/jobs as they exist now. Perhaps that shows up in the ability of corporate entities like the auto manufacturers to insist on proprietary maintenance regimens, lubricants and the like. On the contrary we in the US, fortunately I believe, have specific legal protections which encourage universal serviceability, with broad-spectrum oil grading being just one example.
Perhaps this is changing. BMW does not want to make it possible for an independent shop to work on your car, so they have proprietary software and even, I believe, proprietary hardware to make it virtually impossible for an indie to effectively talk to the computer on at least some late-model bimmers. This seems to me to be a pretty sneaky way to avoid fair competition for your business, and I'm sure it's not only BMW, and pretty confident that it's only the beginning of a trend. The incentive for any corporation to incrementally increase revenues through subtle behaviors that encourage or require existing customers to become recurring streams of income is powerful, and I believe that instances like these are among those in which our usually remarkable system of free-market enterprise needs to be tempered by a little bit of careful intervention (Moss-Magnuson intent, updated for the new century).
- Glenn