OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
I'd argue it is also thin because it can be. The first picture was an M62TUB44, which is 4.4L.the s62 is thin because it was bored out twice from the original 4.0 design
Here's another view of it:
This M62 of course had 92mm bores vs the 94mm bores in the S62, so the S62 was thinner still.
The 305 and 350 SBC's also had the same bore spacing, but you couldn't punch a 305 out to be a 350 because there wasn't enough wall there; the castings were different. There was also the 400SBC with yet again the same bore spacing, but larger bores still, at 4.125". But even the 400 didn't have as little wall material between bores as we are seeing with these special alusil (and nikasil) BMW blocks:
If we want to be really pedantic, the M62 was the successor of the M60, which was available in a 3.0L version with 84mm bores vs the 89mm bores for the 4.0L version.
The M62 was also available in several different displacements ranging from 3.5L to 4.6L and thus bores from 84mm to 93mm, so just a tick off the S62's 94mm bores.
If we look at the S85, it has slightly smaller bores at 92mm, but still pretty tight bore spacing:
Particularly if we compare it to a big bore iron block like the 6.4L HEMI: