It's odd, if M1 oils have a problem in Honda's, why does Honda recommend M1 5-30 in their most sophiscated engines. The Honda HTO-06 high temp and low deposit spec(translated low burnoff) was first meet by M1 5-30, and to this day only a very few oils can meet this spec. Also if M1 was a problem that the naive engineers were not aware of when Honda first certified M1 5-30 as their reccomended oil for the RDX turbo, wouldn't you think they would have discovered this valuable information some of you oil wizzards have known of years ago. My sons 96 Accord used M1 10-30 at 10K ocis and didn't use oil at all. So what? Even though the car itself was junk, the engine performed very well until he sold it with 135K. Also if M1 is the problem in Honda's why does the vast majority of M1 users have no problems at all with M1? As M1 oils are used in more engines than perhaps all the other synthetics combined, it might make a little common since that some would find fault with the leader in synt oil.