No problem, just wanted to explain the relation of SN with respect to SM. Basically API improves the oil specs every five years or so after extensive collaboration efforts with the additive companies and oil blenders, and they come up with new additive packs for the new oil spec.
Base oils change a little but the additive packs do.
The additive packs are what make an oil SN, SM, SL, CJ-4, etc. Some people think that the new additive packs concentrate more on catalyst protection than wear protection, but in reality the specs on wear haven't changed from SM to SN, while many other specs, such as cleaning, improved. In fact, contrary to what many people believe, the SN and SM oils offer better wear protection than the ZDDP-loaded SJ and SL oils. Refer to the API brochure at this link for the list of the API specs for the oil categories:
http://www.infineum.com/Pages/ACEAandAPITables.aspx
The long story short, the latest API spec will give you the best performance -- don't look for older specs left in the shelves or made by obscure companies. API doesn't even license some of the older specs anymore. Perhaps, arguably, the only exceptions could be some antique cars with flat tappets, which could (arguably) benefit from ZDDP-loaded oils of the past, such as API SF. This is probably not necessarily the case though -- with the latest moly additives such as the trinuclear moly, as well as other compounds, the additive companies can formulate antiwear additives with smaller amounts of ZDDP that offer more wear protection than the oils that contain high doses of ZDDP. It looks like the 800 ppm maximum phosphorus in the SN/SM specs is enough for these oils to outperform the previous, SL/SJ specs, thanks to the newer moly and other compounds that enhance the antiwear properties of ZDDP. Too much ZDDP would probably make things worse through increased friction, which results in increased wear. It would also lead to increased deposits.