Originally Posted By: Gokhan
Originally Posted By: JDD
Originally Posted By: buster
I'm with G-MAN on this. I think if anything, this oil is more similar or is a variation of Mobil Super 0w20, only specifically formulated for Toyota. So it's a really good Group III, but doesn't quite have the extreme performance benefits of M1 0w20.
I highly doubt XOM is givnig Toyota a better formulation to Toyota than what they offer for their flaghship oil, Mobil 1.
TGMO is an impressive oil and it gives the best engine response in the Honda 2.4L. The only negative thing I can say about it is the engine is bit more noisy. M1 AFE 0w20/30 keep the 2.4L the quietest among all oils.
So, is the Idemitsu (Mazda OEM) 0W-20 a 'superior' product now if the above info is assumed correct? If so, it will be what is going in my Toyota ---as it is already in my Mazda
No, ExxonMobil is a better oil company than Idemitsu, and apparently Idemitsu varies greatly from batch to batch and is a hit-or-miss.
It's been repeated so many times but we repeat it again: Toyota 0W-20 SN is a completely different oil than Mobil Super 0W-20 SN, which uses the cheaper Afton additive package with Liquid Titanium and has no moly. Toyota 0W-20 SN uses moly, more than likely the expensive ExxonMobil's trinuclear moly. Also, the viscosity index of the Toyota 0W-20 is far superior to both Mobil Super's and Mobil 1's.
Toyota 0W-20 is "specially formulated by Toyota for Toyota vehicles." While that statement sounds like a cliché by a car company, it's true. It's a unique formulation manufactured by ExxonMobil according to Toyota's custom specs and should do well in most Japanese cars.
I have a hard time believing this.
Toyota 0w20 oil is pretty much the cheapest 0w20 on the market, yet you are saying that it is using more expensive additives than Mobil Super, which is a more expensive oil. Obviously nobody takes a loss selling this oil, but oil business has pretty small margins to begin with, so I'm not sure how Exxon can pull it off just for Toyota.