quote:
Tones:
.... I don't need to provide any references. I am not the one making any bold claims. ....
Hundreds of subscribers are posting the results of UOAs. A good portion of them are using Mobil 1. They're reading the other UOAs and keep using Mobil 1.
The bold claim appears to be that everyone missed the fact that Mobil 1 causes engine wear.
The old saying is that you can't prove a negative, and in this case it would require assembling every UOA, grouping them by brand, and then using some statistical analytical method to determine if on average engine-by-engine Mobil 1 shows higher iron numbers.
Apparently you haven't done it.
That means the notion that Mobil 1 shows on average higher iron numbers is an unsupported bold claim.
.