Best (and worst) vehicles from about 1985-2005?

Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
1,307
Location
PA
I'm constantly on the hunt for different used well maintained low price vehicles, and sometimes when you see a good deal you have to have cash and be ready to go look and buy. With that in mind, I'd like input from others on what are some of the brands, makes, and models that really aged well. This can be durability, ease of maintenance, long term reliability, etc. On the flip side, input on some to really avoid that were poorly designed or did not age well is equally helpful. This could be known problematic issues disproportionately impacting a particular design, serious recalls, and so forth.

I'll start.
Good: Everyone knows Toyotas and Lexus of this era seem excellent and retain value well. Their SUVs and trucks in particular really held value well.
Bad: I have no experience but was considering an Isuzu SUV of this era. But when researching, I learned that their 3.2L and 3.5L engines had oil consumption problems and the auto transmissions were reportedly underpowered and problematic.
 
I didn't like the look of the original Ford Taurus. 1987 I think. Everyone called it a space shuttle. After a year or so, I got used to it. I drove a friend's and remember the front wheel drive making it difficult to steer. I had a Mercury Sable later that I enjoyed driving.
 
I didn't like the look of the original Ford Taurus. 1987 I think. Everyone called it a space shuttle. After a year or so, I got used to it. I drove a friend's and remember the front wheel drive making it difficult to steer. I had a Mercury Sable later that I enjoyed driving.

I was around in 1986 when the things came out and they were RADICAL in appearance, especially the wagons. Back then wagons were square and the Taurus was VERY round. They also sold a quarter zillion in the first couple years because every 3rd car seemed to be one.

They look common now because others copied the design. Stuff like having the grill/ radiator intake under the bumper are common now but were radical then.
 
Every Toyota and Honda, and most non-Subaru Japanese cars, the Saturn S-series

Worst: German cars, Subaru, Saturn L-series/Opel Vectra B
1998-2005 is the worst era for German cars. Poor reliability and expensive upkeep peaked at this point. Mk4 Golf/Jetta, E65 7-series, W211, W220, W203, etc.

American cars are cheaply made but reasonably reliable for the most part. Their nadir was of course the late 70s, outside the scope of the era defined in the OP
 
I'll start.
Good: Everyone knows Toyotas and Lexus of this era seem excellent and retain value well. Their SUVs and trucks in particular really held value well.
A Tacoma of the era *seems* excellent (for a while, at least):
rust2.jpg
 
I had a few:
'86 Volvo 740 Turbo (a turbo brick)
'00 Toyota Solara V6 (use synthetic oil and change it often, they can sludge)
'00 BMW 528i
'07 Honda Accord V6 6MT

All great cars. European stuff costs more to keep running but is arguably worth it. Older Volvos in particular are terrific cars. Toyotas and Hondas of that era are for the most part very reliable (Tacoma frames a notable exception).
 
My wife and I had a 1990 Plymouth Acclaim. It was pretty reliable and comfortable. Had the 2.5L. Decent power for the day and good mileage.

I bought my '92 Wrangler. Started out as a street Jeep, but never had any issues. Ended up turning it into the trail rig on the left.
I still run the 2.5L mated to a SM420 granny low transmission. The squirrels run p!ssah.

My wife bought a 1998 Chevy Tracker (Suzuki Sidekick) 4 door, 4WD auto. It was 100% reliable and needed only oil and filter changes until we were T-boned.

I had a '03 Silverado Z71 5.3L that was a cool truck, but had electrical gremlins.
We bought a '04 Malibu Maxx and ended up suing GM via the lemon law. The two worst issues were the electric power steering would turn off at random times and it had a hard/no start condition. You guys ever drive a hydro PS car without a PS belt? Multiply that by 10 and then picture my little Puerto Rican wife trying to turn on the highway. Scary to say the least. Haven't bought a GM since.
 
Good:

General motors A-body-- cutlass ciera etc.
Chevy Cavalier (for when you hit rock bottom)
Ford F150 with the 300-6
most GM pickups
Dodge trucks with the 3.9 V6 and stick shift
Saturn S
Corolla, Camry 4cyl
2004-05 allows the 2nd gen prius

Avoid:

98-02 Accords with the glass automatic tranny
97+ GM W bodies (Regal), U bodies (vans) due to rust, piston slap, and intake gaskets
Early honda civic hybrids
Subarus (locally, due to rust)
most chrysler cars. Their vans are the best of a bad lot though.
 
I had a 2002 honda civic with 5 speed manual. That thing was flawless and I put a lot of miles on it. Best car I owned in that era.
 
1988-1991 Honda Civics with manual transmissions. I had two-they weren’t the fastest, but they were better than most other small cars of the day (I’m looking at you, 1981 & up Escort/Lynx!).
 
In my opinion those era of cars are barf rounded for ease of insertion. Trucks were so so but by now are mostly rusty framed junk.
 
2nd gen ('96-'01) Ford Explorer V8
Terminator Cobra
Mercury Marauder
Any Honda with a K24 and a manual transmission

Edit- honorable mention: Ford Ranger, '93-'97 2.3L/5 speed and '98-'01 2.5L/5 speed
 
Back
Top