Arex Rex Zero 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: JDM396
Again, it's really not a secret that there's a ton of "clones" out there that work as well and sometimes... better... than the original. In the sense that some would probably argue the semantics of some definitions of clones all day long. Point is that several platforms copied previous ones and expanded on the previous, in which this gun isn't an exact clone of a Sig either, there are some differences.


And there are many that don't. They are taking an original, proven design, and are manufacturing it cheaper, by whatever means necessary. Be it on cheaper, slower, less accurate machinery. Lesser quality materials. Cheaper, less skilled labor. Or most likely all of the above. Some clones aren't bad in spite of all of these shortcomings. Others are. It's pretty much luck of the draw.

You might get a IAC Hawk that runs as well as a Remington 870. It's more roughly machined, and more crudely finished. And God only knows what the material is, or where it came from. That's because it costs half as much. If the gun requires parts, there is a good chance you won't be able to get them from the importer. If you can, it could take weeks, or even months. If it's a Chinese clone like the IAC Hawk, good luck all together. There may or may not be enough dimensional changes that allow some Remington parts to fit. Or at the least have a gunsmith try to fit them. None of this is desirable. It's a total PITA. But it's what you get with many cheap, imported clones. As you said, they're not exact, and there are differences. Many times they're just enough to cause problems. If all the Planets are properly aligned on the day it was made, perhaps you'll get lucky. Who knows.

As I said, all of this is a C#RP shoot, nothing more. In a handgun clone, original magazines may fit, or they might not. Or again, they'll require modification in order to work. Magazines from the manufacturer may not be obtainable. If the importer folds up shop as many do after just a couple of years, once again, good luck. Now, if you think all of this nonsense is worth the few bucks you're going to save on these type of guns, then by all means go for it. For many like myself, It's not worth the risk, because the reward just isn't there. I'll save money elsewhere.

I don't like to roll the dice with firearms. And that's exactly what you're doing with a great many of these cheap, imported clones. They, like everything else that appears to be a bargain, are cheaper for a reason. I'm not saying the original can't or won't have a problem. They can. All machines can break. But when they do it's usually faster, easier, and cheaper to rectify the problem, if the product is made here, and not overseas.
 
The only exception I would make here, is if Davidson's handles the gun. If they do it will automatically come with their excellent Lifetime Free Replacement Warranty. Then clone or no, go for it. If it turns out to be a turd they'll replace it like a Craftsman Tool. You can't go wrong. But they are the only firearms distributor that has that kind of guarantee. And they don't handle too many clones. I know they handle the entire Rock Island line. But Rock Island is part of Armscor. And they have a worldwide reputation for a good, quality product. Hence Davidson's carries their entire line. They don't have to replace very many of them.
 
I believe the new issue of the American Rifleman has an article on the gun in question. I had never even heard of it until then.
 
Originally Posted By: billt460
Originally Posted By: JDM396
Again, it's really not a secret that there's a ton of "clones" out there that work as well and sometimes... better... than the original. In the sense that some would probably argue the semantics of some definitions of clones all day long. Point is that several platforms copied previous ones and expanded on the previous, in which this gun isn't an exact clone of a Sig either, there are some differences.


And there are many that don't. They are taking an original, proven design, and are manufacturing it cheaper, by whatever means necessary. Be it on cheaper, slower, less accurate machinery. Lesser quality materials. Cheaper, less skilled labor. Or most likely all of the above. Some clones aren't bad in spite of all of these shortcomings. Others are. It's pretty much luck of the draw.

You might get a IAC Hawk that runs as well as a Remington 870. It's more roughly machined, and more crudely finished. And God only knows what the material is, or where it came from. That's because it costs half as much. If the gun requires parts, there is a good chance you won't be able to get them from the importer. If you can, it could take weeks, or even months. If it's a Chinese clone like the IAC Hawk, good luck all together. There may or may not be enough dimensional changes that allow some Remington parts to fit. Or at the least have a gunsmith try to fit them. None of this is desirable. It's a total PITA. But it's what you get with many cheap, imported clones. As you said, they're not exact, and there are differences. Many times they're just enough to cause problems. If all the Planets are properly aligned on the day it was made, perhaps you'll get lucky. Who knows.

As I said, all of this is a C#RP shoot, nothing more. In a handgun clone, original magazines may fit, or they might not. Or again, they'll require modification in order to work. Magazines from the manufacturer may not be obtainable. If the importer folds up shop as many do after just a couple of years, once again, good luck. Now, if you think all of this nonsense is worth the few bucks you're going to save on these type of guns, then by all means go for it. For many like myself, It's not worth the risk, because the reward just isn't there. I'll save money elsewhere.

I don't like to roll the dice with firearms. And that's exactly what you're doing with a great many of these cheap, imported clones. They, like everything else that appears to be a bargain, are cheaper for a reason. I'm not saying the original can't or won't have a problem. They can. All machines can break. But when they do it's usually faster, easier, and cheaper to rectify the problem, if the product is made here, and not overseas.


Again, I believe there's a lack of real world experience. Concerning the 982, the Hawk does have modularity with the 870 except the barrel, but who cares? What's fascinating is that again, it's actually made better than the 870 express, no mim and no plastic trigger guard. Many said the same about Norinco in various platforms, come to find out, several of their firearms were very well made. Some would've and did call them cheap back in the day, but as I said, some just don't know any better. Several other companies have built clones or copies, of which Ruger, Sig and S&W are not foreign to this practice. I know I'd rather have a Bersa than a Walther after owning a Walther PPK. There's all sorts of H&K rifle clones that work well. I also know that some of the Turkish clones are REALLY well made and apparently function just as well as the guns they copied.

You see, the more you're exposed to firearms the more you realize how many companies copied off one another at some point so wannabe snobbery is usually mental masturbation. What matters is the relative execution of it's products and there are just too many variables to consider to make blanket statements.

Finally, in some cases it's not just a matter of saving money, in which we aren't even talking about a cheap firearm here. What it comes down to is being smarter with your money relative to the quality of the firearm and in most cases seeing past the warm and fuzzies of marketing. Again, not unlike oil products.

For reference, I own several Semi-custom 1911s including Wilsons, Baers, and Dan Wesson. Also own a couple of Norincos, not because I needed to save money, but because they were REALLY well built 1911s. Ugly with tool marks, but tough as nails.
 
Prescription medications, Chinese shotguns, custom 1911's, Harbor Freight generators... what are we going to talk about next?

I think we should talk about the Rex Zero 1, and if you want to talk about something else, perhaps a private message or starting your own thread would be more appropriate.

Back to your regularly scheduled topic...
 
I'll have have to start a new thread when I get it, unless I change my mind again. I'm having a hard time deciding between the full size and the compact
 
Originally Posted By: 901Memphis
I'll have have to start a new thread when I get it, unless I change my mind again. I'm having a hard time deciding between the full size and the compact


Didn't know they made a compact version. Cool!
 
Originally Posted By: bubbatime
I think we should talk about the Rex Zero 1, and if you want to talk about something else, perhaps a private message or starting your own thread would be more appropriate.


Go ahead and talk about it. There is nothing, or no one stopping you. What you don't like, don't read.
 
Originally Posted By: john_pifer
Originally Posted By: 901Memphis
I'll have have to start a new thread when I get it, unless I change my mind again. I'm having a hard time deciding between the full size and the compact


Didn't know they made a compact version. Cool!


Yep here's the picture I've been staring at trying to decide.

Full size is 17+1 with 4.3 barrel, the compact is 15+1 and 3.85 in barrel.

 
Originally Posted By: 901Memphis
Originally Posted By: john_pifer
Originally Posted By: 901Memphis
I'll have have to start a new thread when I get it, unless I change my mind again. I'm having a hard time deciding between the full size and the compact


Didn't know they made a compact version. Cool!


Yep here's the picture I've been staring at trying to decide.

Full size is 17+1 with 4.3 barrel, the compact is 15+1 and 3.85 in barrel.




Man, that's a tough-looking handgun. But, then, most handguns designed in Eastern Europe tend to be good-looking.

It would be interesting to shoot one, back-to-back, with a CZ and CZ clones, just to compare accuracy, trigger pull, recoil impulse, etc.
 
I don't have any experience with it but the reviews all seem positive. I wouldn't take all the harshness towards copies to heart. This gun isn't really a "copy" or generic anyways. It is based on the design of the sig but I wouldn't call it a copy. Much like the Spinx SDP, It is based on the CZ 75 design but is certainly unique enough to not be fair to call it a "copy'. The reviews on that gun are very good also.

I would say, if you like it, go for it!

As far as holsters, I am sure someone will be making them soon. check around ebay, there are a lot of custom holsters and holsters for brand new guns there. If the gun is in stock where ever you are buying it, try a leather holster than fits the sig 226 or 229. It looks close enough to fit and work.

This will get you by until a proper holster is available. I have one and it isn't terrible, for what it is.

https://www.daltechforce.com/collections...ing-strap-large
 
Kind of like the Serb CZ99. It looks like a Sig copy, but it is sort of a blend of Sig and Walther P88 (Especially on the inside).
 
The talk about it being a clone doesn't effect me at all. I don't care about how it got there I just care about the end product. Firearms are so similar these days I'm surprised there isn't more lawsuits over this stuff.

I'm not too worried about parts/repair. I don't get to the range as much as I would like to so the gun will either be carried or sit more than shot once I initially get it and confirm function of course. The warranty is supposed to be handled through FIME group out of Las Vegas with lifetime warranty to the original owner.

I am concerned about the current lack of holster availability given the popularity of the firearm on the web and now being out for over a year since it came out at shot show 2016.

I did find one decent looking iwb holster though.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01KKG3TRY/

I have a few guns on my radar actually, not much in common other than I want to stay with 9mm. Here is a list of guns I'm considering....

Rex zero 1S/C
Glock 19
M&P 2.0 in 4.25 inch
Ruger American (compact or full size)
CZ P10C
Walther PPQ
S&W SD9VE
 
Memphis - That looks like a great holster, if you like that style of IWB.

All your other choices are good ones, although they are all very new and have not established much of a track record, besides the Glock. I have experience with most of them and here is my 2 cents if you want it or not
wink.gif


The glock 19 will be the most established, reliable, serviceable, customizable and light weight out of that bunch. It is also the most common and most would say most boring and least ergonomic.

The M&P series are good guns, the gen2 should be no exception unless there are bugs with this new design. Personally, I don't like the grip or trigger on the stock m&p's and I think they need work. I have the m&p 45 and I am trying to sell it. It is a good gun but doesn't impress me personally.

The Ruger is too new to say much but based on Ruger's other handguns and the looks of this new gun, I would pass.

The CZ looks very promising and this will probably be one of my next guns. Like anything new, there may be some teething issues and bugs to work out.

The Walther is very ergonomic and has a great trigger. The reviews are good, the gun seems to sell well and there are holsters and accessories available. The slide stop is too long for my tastes but should be a good choice either way.

The SD9VE is kind of a budget gun and was/is known to have a 10 pound trigger. There doesn't seem to be a lot of info out there for this gun but the feed back seems positive anyways. I would only buy this gun if you could find it at a very low price.

Like we already said, the rex series looks good at first glance but it is still to early say. If you don't mind taking a chance, get it.
 
AMC covered most of what I would say.

I can speak from owning the Glock, M&P, and older Sigma (SD9VE, and the Walther that I only still own the Walther and G19. The Walther has probably the best stock polymer trigger out there. The M&Ps are great guns and I'm interested to fondle one of the new ones. The SD9VE is a great budget gun but you'll have to play with the trigger to get a halfway decent one. Personally, I'm waiting on the CZ for my next gun. Supposedly it has a trigger as good as the PPQ. Supposedly.
laugh.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom