4-stroke MXer oil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
we really don't have esso here in the usa. certainly not south of the mason/dixon that is for sure. so i have not tested any of those oils. while castrol 0w30 did hold up, it also showed significant increase in copper amounts in the used oil analysis and others on other bikes have seen this as well.
crf450's get to use clutch side oil and engine side oil. sure you can use the same in both sides. SRT white jug is a favorite down here. keep an eye on those valves and piston skirts. and make darn sure you keep the transmission full too. with as little oil as the crf's hold, you would be best served using the shortest oci you can afford.
 
Thanks for the quick reply.

What I have heard is that Exxon and Esso are sister companies though the XD-3 is a Canadian designed & made product.
How do you feel about a non-syn in these engines considering the heat the .7 litres of oil has to endure? I've always been worried about a non syn handling the high temps?

I may do a synthetic/conventional 50/50 blend to keep costs the same and do 3 hour intervals.

Are you for the ATF-F in mx transmisions that are engine independent?
 
i have yet to see a flash point from conventional that is significantly lower than synthetic. or for that matter one from synthetic that is actually higher than non!
you have no heat in canada. try texas or arizona. it is a non-factor for you.
i am an avid fan of atf-f in 2smokes. on the hondas which are known for sucknig the seal in and having all of the transmission oil in the motor, i don't recommend it. if they held the seals then it would be fine, but they don't. just run the same good oil in both sides.
 
Quote:


I wonder even though it fell out of grade, did it protect the engine any less? Just wondering?




Excellent question...its why Sunruh gets so much heat about his posts. Becasue an oil falls out of grade, per one report from Blackstone Labs, he says the oil is junk. Thats not the way to judge an oil.

Also, the VR1 20w-50 is says right on the bottle, "contains friction modifiers". Its what all OEM's claim to stay away from for wet clutch applications.

Wether you believe the OEM's, a friend who says XXXXXXXX brand/weight/spec worked in his bike with no problem, or some guy on the net, it makes no difference cause everything is a personal choice. (some call this FREEDOM)
 
And Sunruh, why waste your time typing you opinion over and over again and post all your used oil analysis to allow people to see your results. May be then you wont get so defensive.

You already spent the money, why not show everyone what it was worth. Kinda pointless to keep all the info to yourself IMO. Your here arent you...
 
I've seen dozens of Steve's used oil analysis posted.
I think you'll find that it is some of you offering up nothing but opinion, backed up by raw emotion, and not much else.
Steve has been offering up valid used oil analysis for quite some time now. Try searching the forums before thrashing the man.
SHeesh...

Autodarken...can you tell us just what "friction modifiers" are? And can you tell us just why these oil mixers and bottle fillers put out such info on their MC specific bottles? Better yet,. do you think you can find an oil...ANY oil that has no friction modifiers in it?
(what makes me think you are going to list a MC specific oil poured into a bottle by some marketing wiz and his pals?)
 
Quote:


I've seen dozens of Steve's used oil analysis posted.
I think you'll find that it is some of you offering up nothing but opinion, backed up by raw emotion, and not much else.
Steve has been offering up valid used oil analysis for quite some time now. Try searching the forums before thrashing the man.
SHeesh...

Autodarken...can you tell us just what "friction modifiers" are? And can you tell us just why these oil mixers and bottle fillers put out such info on their MC specific bottles? Better yet,. do you think you can find an oil...ANY oil that has no friction modifiers in it?
(what makes me think you are going to list a MC specific oil poured into a bottle by some marketing wiz and his pals?)




Hey now...never did I say his used oil analysis are invalid. I've seen his posts for more than a year, and rarely did Blackstone state the oil was trashed. It was his assumption, and opinion based on one spec that was slightly out. That does not make an oil junk.

And I didnt give my opinion about MC specific oils either...I said its one choice.

What I did say about VR1 20w-50 is that the first line states it has "friction modifiers", moly being the major additive that *can* (wont say will) cause wet clutch slippage.

If its marketing or not, I dont care. I hate conspiracy theories.

I wont use an aircraft oil in my car, I wont put 5w-20 auto oil in my auto transmission, and I wont use an fuel oil in my diesel. Cause they ALL work in either application, but I'll take the bottle that says its made for what I'm using it for, at least in the items that cost me thousand of dollars.

Dont think you can call me out in attempt to look like I dont know anything just cause my name is new on this forum. My history with online forums and the old school email only threads is longer than the majority here.

If anyone gets worked up, its Sunruh and those defending him. He gets a ton of questions about WHY he says a given oil is garbage. What if that oil he lists is what you have run for 10 years problem free? Wouldnt you question him too?

Its his own personal opinions, not the actual lab report that gets the heat. If he'd stick to the facts, and may be not jump to the conclusion something is junk from one line item, he wouldnt get so many questions. Think about it...
 
If the oil has worked for you, why would you care if someone else claims its garbage? All oils have friction modifers, even MC oils. They don't have as much as a energy conserving oil, its not a problem. He wants an oil thats going to stay in grade. If it doesn't matter to you, who cares? By the way, if you read his post at the end of the first page, you'd realize your getting mad about nothing.
 
Quote:


If the oil has worked for you, why would you care if someone else claims its garbage? All oils have friction modifers, even MC oils. They don't have as much as a energy conserving oil, its not a problem. He wants an oil thats going to stay in grade. If it doesn't matter to you, who cares? By the way, if you read his post at the end of the first page, you'd realize your getting mad about nothing.




Who's mad? I cant state my opinion here?

FYI - "energy conserving" = "friction modifiers" for nearly all oils XXw-30 thru XXw-20. Friction modifiers added to anything above XXw-30 are not given the "energy conserving" label due to its higher viscosity. But the generic term applies to the almost the same additives.

VR1 20w-50 is not recomended for motorcycles, period. Valvoline makes 20w-50 and 10w-40 specific oil for motorcycles and ATV's. Its the SAME PRICE as the VR1. Where's the aurguement here? Where's the marketing conspiracy?

In Sunruh's defense, IMO his point is that many oils at XXw-40 and XXw-50 do not contain moly, and can be used as an inexpensive MC oil. Some of which are better than MC specific oils for his MX bike. And he's 100% correct, but an MX bike will give different results compared to a street bike. Something else to keep in mind.

Its just said as a matter of fact that MC oils are no good cause they loose some viscosity. Many automotive oils fall out of grade too, and no one is claiming the oil is no good for that one reason. Its noted...thats all.

Viscosity is important, but there's so much more to a great oil.
 
hmmmm i can't seem to find any posts of used oil analysis that contain comments from blackstone. hmmmm. i wonder where you are dreaming up what my reports say? interesting to say the least.
and i'm sure you have all the knowledge about my bike to understand all of the data.
lets start with a simple one: what fuels do i use? and how can they affect a used oil analysis?
 
Quote:


hmmmm i can't seem to find any posts of used oil analysis that contain comments from blackstone. hmmmm. i wonder where you are dreaming up what my reports say? interesting to say the least.
and i'm sure you have all the knowledge about my bike to understand all of the data.
lets start with a simple one: what fuels do i use? and how can they affect a used oil analysis?




I'm not playing this game...

You have posted used oil analysis in other locations (other sites) in the past Sunruh. And your trying to discredit me by trying to find something I'm missing or may not know by chance. I love to debate online, but I dont play games, sorry.

Your mistaking me for an idiot.
 
Well, I'm not mistaking you for an idiot...but I would like to know how you came up with energy conserving=friction modifiers? Have you ever even looked at the criteria for the API EC rating? And if you have, is there anything in there that mandates the use of these friction modifiers?

I think too many folks use the ignorance of conventional wisdom for their arguments, rather than published facts.
Wait..I need to include marketing magic as another criteria for many folks arguments too.

I find it funny how an MC specific boutique oil will claim "No Friction Modifiers!" yet will contain ~100ppm Mo (or more).
Mobil1 Racing 4T is a moto specific fluid with a JASO MA rating, yet contains moly. That alone should show that much of the marketing hype is simply bunk, desinged to keep conventional wisdom ignorant, and sales up.
 
Quote:


Well, I'm not mistaking you for an idiot...but I would like to know how you came up with energy conserving=friction modifiers? Have you ever even looked at the criteria for the API EC rating? And if you have, is there anything in there that mandates the use of these friction modifiers?

I think too many folks use the ignorance of conventional wisdom for their arguments, rather than published facts.
Wait..I need to include marketing magic as another criteria for many folks arguments too.

I find it funny how an MC specific boutique oil will claim "No Friction Modifiers!" yet will contain ~100ppm Mo (or more).
Mobil1 Racing 4T is a moto specific fluid with a JASO MA rating, yet contains moly. That alone should show that much of the marketing hype is simply bunk, desinged to keep conventional wisdom ignorant, and sales up.




From the Mobil site. "So unlike Mobil 1 for cars, Mobil 1 Racing 4T 10W-40 has no friction modifiers, which could lead to clutch slippage."
 
Quote:


From the Mobil site. "So unlike Mobil 1 for cars, Mobil 1 Racing 4T 10W-40 has no friction modifiers, which could lead to clutch slippage."




Hmmm - Take a look at these used oil analysis
http://theoildrop.server101.com/forums/s...ge=0#Post737730

http://theoildrop.server101.com/forums/s...ge=2#Post714759

http://theoildrop.server101.com/forums/s...ge=2#Post714943

Mobil does contain moly. If you look at the beloved AMS MC oil, it contains moly as well. Obviously a small amount is nothing to worry about.
 
You know guys...the JASO MA spec isnt there to cause greif. Its there to make thing simple for those who dont care about the parts per million of whatever in their oil. See the spec...know it works. Period.

JASO MA is doent exsist for oil companies to make an extra dime. Fact is, the market is very, very small.

Other oils DO work that are NOT JASO MA certified. But claim JASO MA is a waste and the oils are junk...and prepare for some debate.

Lets bring this back down to earth...

WHAT IS JASO MA?
It is basically a set of standards to rate the performance of lubricants being used for 4-stroke motorcycles with wet-clutch. JASO standards were promulgated by the Japanese Automotive Standards Organization in 1998.

JASO standards include the following requirements:

Quality rating: from API SE and above
Required physical and chemical characteristics: low sulfur residue, low volatility, low foaming, stable viscosity at high temperature and high speed...
Sufficient friction for clutch performance
JASO MA is the only set of standards for lubricant that is accepted by Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki and Yamaha...

JASO MA is the only set of standards for lubricant accepted by Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki and Yamaha.
 
Why do some of us defend Sunruh? Even the local dealer says long life for these dry sump high strung motors is new oil. "change it ,change it" was what the dealer says and the manual to. Yamalube is $ 5 per litre and all these super synthetics are over $10 per litre. Not very cost effective to just dump it after a couple of hours racing. These motors also don't have thermostats for consitant temps. Older models use a screen not a proper filter for the oil, These bikes are not your daddys hog or your brothers xr Honda from 1985. They rev high and are double the horse power of the #@$%! that used to be four stroke dirt bikes 20 years ago. For real info go to www.thumpertalk.com
canada.gif
 
All the pro MXer's use synthetic. All the Honda Pro MXer's use Amsoil. The official oil for AMA MX is Amsoil. Do you know something they don't?
 
I know that ALL pro honda riders don't use AMS
liar.gif
IL, and buying an official sponsorship means nothing about what products are used by the racers. Nice try though.
 
Quote:


You know guys...the JASO MA spec isnt there to cause greif. Its there to make thing simple for those who dont care about the parts per million of whatever in their oil. See the spec...know it works. Period.




That may be the bottom line for some, but if we look a bit closer we see that, although the JASO standards can provide a cluless individual with an easy choice of oil that is marketed towards his application, it is far from a standard that guarantees superior performance.
In fact, I find the JASO standards to be far less stringent than those of API SM or GF-4.

JASO MA is only a guarantee that an oil is of a SG(obsolete API standard) certifiable oil that passes a very few meager performance benchmarks, and that the fluid falls within certain frictional ranges. That's it.
http://www.jalos.or.jp/onfile/pdf/4T_EV0604.pdf

API SM oil see's a few more performance requirements than the JASO certification does.
http://www.api.org/certifications/engineoil/pubs/upload/Technical Bulletin 3.PDF

And ILSAC GF-4 oils pass even more performance requirements.
http://www.api.org/certifications/engineoil/pubs/upload/Technical Bulletin 2.PDF

Yes, JASO standards requires the oil to be within certain frictional limits when used with a wet clutch, but just because an oil has not submitted to JASO for a motorcycle specific certification, it doesn't mean that the fluid won't easily fall into a catagory deemed suitible for a wet clutch by JASO.

It is easy to find many oils on the auot parts shelf that are far more robust than what the JASO standards call for. And most of those oils cost far less than any JASO certified oil marketed to motorcycles.
And forums like these make it easy to find anecdotal evidence of these products functioning quite well in a wet clutch situation, and even better in many cases, than many of the JASO moto niche fluids.

The case that JASO certified oils are simply the best choice to make for motorcycle use just doesn't pan out.
Adequate oils?...sure, they are adequate. But they are not guaranteed to be superior performing fluids, by any stretch.

Tim,
Have you ever even been to a national MX or GNCC, let alone in the pits?
I firmly believe that a motorcycle...ANY motorcycle needs to have it's lubricating fluid changed out on a very frequent basis. Not only because the fluid gets worn out much faster than in other type applications, but also because a wet clutch creates a lot of contamination very quickly. I think that we may find concensus on this issue with the more versed tuners and mechanics.
And if we subscribe to changing out our fluids using regular short OCI's, give me the reason that I must use a synthetic fluid. Just what exactly would a higher cost synthetic fluid do for me? Can you show me anything, past perhaps the ability to extend the OCI a bit, that says I can benefit from using a synthetic fluid...(whatever that may mean)?

I am curious though...
Does it read like this?;

SALES RULE #762
"When all else fails, and you don't have them yet...play the sponsorship card! Many will fall for that, when sales rules #1-#761 aren't working.
dunno.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom