0w-20
FB2 liter was a 0w20 for Impreza and Crosstrek wife's 23 is 0W20.
The lubricant will flow to places it need to be, but controls and systems will balk at an overly viscous fluid and with an overboard HTHS and car will be unresponsive to a fault.
Been there and done it a few times over the past decade. If you DD a car from new, you will know if it is working well enough to design intent.
'
Only go as high on HTHS as you anticipate the necessity. Script on the oil fill cap is the starting point.
I think you are trying to call out baloney, but you can reserve that skepticism for the layperson and the impressionable.With a 30-grade. Really.
The FB 2.0 and 2.5 N.A. have always been 0w20, in fact they were pushing Subaru Genuine Synthetic to a fault.I was curious on what was required when the vehicle first came out. Not a 2023 model year.
The FB 2.0 and 2.5 N.A. have always been 0w20, in fact they were pushing Subaru Genuine Synthetic to a fault.
I think the Subaru (Idemitsu) oil is better than any other OTC premium lube in overall performance, but you wouldn't expect to see anything alarming in a UOA using any near current ILSAC GF spec lube.
Unless it’s the 1.5T and maybe the J35 VCM engines, I wouldn’t hesitate to run a 0W-20 in a Honda. For the Subaru, it’s a bit more nuanced. A regular non-turbo FB20/25 won’t complain on 0W-20 but an ILSAC 5W-30 will do the engine a bit better if road trips involving the mountains and high speed are in play. But a turbo Subaru IMO is better served with a Euro C3/C6 ideally 5W-30 oil to help mitigate fuel dilution. The MPG difference is minuscule.Unless WRX is used by someone OCD on warm up and maximum fuel economy (not the reckless hypermiling) and engine longevity, WRX should be running 0 or 5W30. That is a budget high performance vehicle.
I actually may out 5W30 in my Fit spec’ed for 0W20 this summer when I potentially take it on long distance trips at high speed with 4-5 people and gears with the A/C blasting. I may lose 1-1.5 mpg but definitely lower the risk of wear with such a high load on the engine.
With a 30-grade. Really.
But I ran it and it was inappropriate in some of my vehicles. So bench race all you want, when the rubber meets the road that is what matters. However implausible on the surface, just a cautionary tidbit. Take it or leave it.Not to mention, hths doesn't come into play for the hydraulics part, the shear isn't high enough. KV would be a better indicator
Sorry for being "testy" I think My turbotax session this past weekend was getting to meNot to mention, hths doesn't come into play for the hydraulics part, the shear isn't high enough. KV would be a better indicator
Over 10 years ago someone did a study with several UOAs over time, and a teardown IIRC. Or maybe it was a link to another site, I'm not sure.Can you please provide actual timing chain test data to support your statement?
Too bad you can't find this study. I'd love to see how they actually correlated the winter rating to wear (especially using spectrographic analysis for part of the conclusion) and how they controlled all the variables in the test. All of that would be quite a feat and be able to come out with statistically valid data.Over 10 years ago someone did a study with several UOAs over time, and a teardown IIRC. Or maybe it was a link to another site, I'm not sure.
But the results did show a correlation between less wear using a 10wXX vs a 0wXX. (Both oils had the same high temp viscosity)
Psh. Even as a multiple-time Subaru owner that hasn’t suffered any of their infamous blunders, I would reply to that misplaced faith with, “Tell me again how long it took Subaru to fix the EJ251/253 head gasket issue? At least 9 years and 2 million engines??”Mention this on the almighty Subaru site and you will be smited because you questioned the logic of the all powerful Subaru engineers.
ExactlyPsh. Even as a multiple-time Subaru owner that hasn’t suffered any of their infamous blunders, I would reply to that misplaced faith with, “Tell me again how long it took Subaru to fix the EJ251/253 head gasket issue? At least 9 years and 2 million engines??”
My son has a 2002 WRX that is just over 380,000 km right now and it’s still on the original engine (head gasket untouched) and original turbo. They aren’t as bad as people make them out to be.Funny thing is even with the head gasket years the number of Subie’s that go to 200k with nothing but oil changes is astronomical. Only rivaled by 2006 and earlier Volvos.
True story… there will always be a special place in my heart for the 2005-2008 Subaru lineup… back when they were still quirky yet more capable than the mainstream (other than outright speed, lol). If you knew the warning signs you could easily pick up a great deal anywhere you went. Sadly, those days are gone with the used market raising the prices even of junk.Funny thing is even with the head gasket years the number of Subie’s that go to 200k with nothing but oil changes is astronomical. Only rivaled by 2006 and earlier Volvos.