Hi AFT and welcome to BITOG. It’s good to have another experienced Separation Science (Filtration) SME on board. I mainly work in Level I and III but have to troubleshoot in Level II at times. I might be able to throw some business your way on testing a given design against a specific process and contamination scenario if this is within your business model beyond the typical automotive type/canister filtration. You do say filtration and not end product specific so I’m asking for clarification.
I fully understand and respect what you go through to build your internal data and protect confidentiality. I do the same thing and try to maintain vendor neutrality at all times in spite of my personal preferences and never reveal client specifics.
Your site is a little light on detail but do you go into filtration consulting and in industrial areas such as belt filtration, candle, Leaf, Press, Packed Bed, Membrane etc. and particle analysis to design media for a given specific process and then troubleshooting or are you a finished product testing and certification lab? This could include calculating Darcy et al and various permutations and combinations of the equation as it would relate to a specific process or filtration requirement.
Are you capable of a full spectrum analysis such as a wash study and CFD modeling to get total solids by bulk, size, distribution and geometry and design warp/weft/Satin numbers, depth properties to a theoretical model for capture and retention or separation?
Is your lab and engineering staff capable of FMEA/RCFA design and forensic evaluations of various media to establish characteristics of surface straining, depth straining and later depth filtration (sub bedding) in order to properly evaluate/anticipate a particular woven or felt media (synthetic or otherwise) against a particular scenario?
Do you do the same for air filtration and specialized tests like air permeation in addition to all the MERV stuff?
Lastly, is your lab ISO certified and you have a documented quality plan and credentials and associations available for client review should they require it? Sometimes I run into that because it’s one thing to have a test rig and “test to a standard”- some require an authorized testing facility as well. Most of mine is in mining, catalyst and chemical so they often need that level of validation.
Anyway, welcome aboard and I look forward to seeing the results of your testing. I’m sure it will generate some very interested questions and be a huge benefit to the board.
Hello,
Great to hear from you. Thanks for having me here.
If I can help you in any way I will. Separations covers such a broad spectrum of industries. I will try to sum up what we do and perhaps it may help a little.
I may be able to help you on portions of what you are trying to achieve, but not all. I will try to clear up the scope of what we do.
Customers send us their filters, cartridges, flat sheet media, and heads/housings for testing the filtration efficiency and capacity, and we send the reports to them. This can be in either the R and D stage, product qualification stage, or quality control stage for a product that is already established in circulation.
We also preform parts cleanliness testing for components on hydraulic fluid power systems, as well as batch fluid cleanliness testing.
Most consulting we do revolves around custom test design, and test stand design to accomplish defined goals as filter products are developed.
Off the top of my head, I can help with membrane media testing, and perhaps candle, and press. I cannot see us being able to assist with belt filtration, or leaf.
The packed bed reactors if it is a catalyst filled I cannot, if it is a precipitate forming reaction perhaps I can.
Darcy Permutations on only the components of your system we can test is a possibility, but not the big picture I imagine you want. Any CFD modeling would be done with Altair software, but this is not something we normally do.
As far as FMEA/RCFA design, we have a variation for our own machines as part of own internal quality plan, but do not provide this service.
No Air, no MERV, however I can recommend labs that do, as well as consultants with other specialties, that can help you in areas that I cannot.
We have our own internal quality plan. Thus far providing calibration certs for instruments used on tests to our customers has been sufficient for traceability. We have thought about an A2LA ISO 17025 accreditation, but at this time do not feel it necessary.
I hope this info helps, and please look up my phone from the AFT website and give me a call anytime next week. We can see if there is any way we can help you achieve your goals. Ask for Andrew.
This is going to be a fun project, and I hope we all can enjoy it together. I believe your vote was for Mobil-1.