Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: tig1
Of course XM will deny responsibility since M1 EP wasn't in your engine. Per the UOA you did.
Well it was in their bottle....the fact that it doesn't test the same does not mean that Mobil are off the hook, as something wrong in the wrong bottle...logically...doesn't look like what SHOULD be in the bottle does it ???
So by definition, it wasn't M1 the he tipped in his engine, but it doesn't mean that it couldn't have been incorrectly made by Mobil.
Personally, and on probability, I’d go chain of custody and lodge a claim with Walmart and let it run back up the waterfall.
Come on man...
They don’t make that stuff one jug at a time and if this was a Mobil issue it would be ALL OVER THE PLACE...
Not this one jug.
I is not Mobil’s fault, any more than one tampered with shaker of Morton salt would be Morton’s fault.
Did you read my post ?
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Personally, and on probability, I’d go chain of custody and lodge a claim with Walmart and let it run back up the waterfall.
Your "single bottle" strawman is stupid ... especially if you don't read the post that you are quoting.
In the salt analogy, does the customer own the problem, or have recourse ?
If the customer bought a faulty product, then chain of custody starts at the person who sold it to them...simple...get it ?
Oh I read your post.
Quote:
Well it was in their bottle....the fact that it doesn’t test the same does not mean that Mobil are off the hook, as something wrong in the wrong bottle...logically...doesn't look like what SHOULD be in the bottle does it ???
Mobil is off the hook there is no way that if they bottled it there would be this single bottle. It WOULD BE all over. That isn’t a straw man, it is as close to a fact as you are likely to find.
Anyone who thinks Mobil shipped that is an idiot period. What happened after it left Mobil is anyones guess.
He can’t even prove it came out of the bottle...