I don’t really ever see threads on either SF.org nor NASIOC.com about FA20DIT failures. People like to build on to these engines, be it with bolt-ons or a fully built block with forged internals and all supporting mods. With that said, it may be popular, but likely not common. It’s probably more common for someone to flash a Stage 1 tune or bolt on some mods with or without an appropriate tune. What I’m getting at: I wouldn’t use the prices of a performance engine builder as a basis for failure rate. That just seems like flawed logic.
The correlation between the cost of short blocks and failure rate is interesting. I’ve never thought of that. I’m. It sure of that correlation is accurate, because I don’t k ow what the demand is for each of the blocks you listed, but it’s an interesting point. HOWEVER, unless you have failure rate data, I’m going to unfortunately say that your logic is baseless and irrelevant.
Both of you: you either have the data or you don’t. Chrysler is usually at the bottom of the barrel in CR reliability surveys, but I take those surveys with a big ‘ol grain of salt. If CR were our litmus for reliability, name a more reliable sports car than the WRX at that price point. I think you’ll find they all have their failure modes and none seem to be immune from people complaining about this or that about each online.
EJ != FA.
The high-rev’ing N/A FA D-4S dual-injection != FADIT.