One thing I really agree with him on is you can't just use TBN to determine proper drain intervals with modern ultra low sulfur fuels. Between that and that engine builder from Nissan/Infiniti telling people if they want their engine to last hundreds of thousands of miles they should change their oil every 2k it's even more reason for me to keep my 3k interval.
The proof is in the pudding, if my Hyundai can make it to 231,000 miles, still have 180psi compression, a mirror like finish on all the valvetrain components and burn no oil by keeping to 3k oil changes its obviously not a waste.
Just food for thought. While he is a CLS, and quote a “motor oil geek” - he comes from the background of the racing world and performance engine building.
He does not come from the “real world” of lubricants. Fleet, commercial, industrial and large scale PCEO. Where fuel isn’t perfect, conditions aren’t perfect. Where the operators and users aren’t perfect. Etc.
It was in another thread here where I said this. Lake and I have very similar educations, paths in life. But mine is all from the C&I / Fleet side of things, as a distributor / marketer. I get it, gasoline you get out of the pump isn’t perfect. Your operating conditions might range from -10f while you sit in bumper to bumper traffic, to 110f while you take the 10 mile highway drive home.
I also get it from the OEM manufacturers eyes. 1 engine failing isn’t a major issue. Stuff happens. QA happens. Having massive issues across the entire line up? That’s a problem. That was a design error.
So when he talks about TBN, he’s looking at it from more of an ideal situation / book view. It’s what is said in the books basically. Which we all know is out dated and there’s the real world issues on top of that.
Now onto the project farm: if you take any of his oil reviews seriously. Especially with the one armed bandit… I don’t think I have anything positive to say. Please don’t take anything that fraud does as serious advice. If you don’t want to believe me, you do you. But… yeah.