Toyota Crown takes 0w8 oil

I don’t think other manufacturers are doing any better. My current Fusion with the 1.5T gets worse MPG than the Fusion with the 2.5 NA I had before it. Gaming the EPA ratings seems to be the majority of the manufacturer’s play.
Fords smaller turbo engines have yet to impress me. Poor low end grunt and poor MPG. A few other manufactures have the small 4 cylinder turbo engines dialed in just right.
 
Maybe I'm off base here, but who else engineers IC engines with as much development and advancements for general purpose commuter cars(aka for efficiency) than Toyota? Their latest 4cyl generation is getting very close to the theoretical limit of thermal efficiency for ICE using fairly novel intake flow pattern, with head design and con rod stroke angle IIRC. Also, designing an engine to work with ultra low viscosity oil(oil passages, bearing surfaces, pumping system, multi-stage cooling) in itself doesn't indicate effort in engineering a fuel efficient engine?

Maybe I'm not looking at all the angles here, but from what I've seen, Toyota is one of the few makers out there that actually try to engineer and develop high efficiency ICE engines. Rather than just haphazardly cobbling together 20 year old peripheral technologies like GDI, low tension rings etc then throwing on a lean as possible ECU tune.
Yes, pinnacle of innovation.
 
I am interested in it too considering that above posts claims they figured everything out.
I am just not sure how Car and Driver got same mpg with BMW 330 M Performance as Camry Hybrid?
Probably the same way Top Gear got a M3 to achieve better MPG than a Prius.

41% efficiency isn't efficient enough for you for a gasoline engine?

And how did a Camry hybrid average 23 mpg in C&D testing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJH

Attachments

  • 4F2BE69D-CA2C-4834-BBE8-E5E136F16246.webp
    4F2BE69D-CA2C-4834-BBE8-E5E136F16246.webp
    56.9 KB · Views: 64
Maybe ... Recently, I was made aware of Diamond Like Coatings which allow gearboxes, and maybe other parts, to run without oil. While I recall hearing that they've been used in a racing situation, I don't recall if it was just testing or in actual competition.

These coatings have many applications (and come in a variety of designer colors) The "coatings are environmentally friendly and can be used to reduce friction, wear, fretting, galling and corrosion."

I suspect, but do not know, that they are being at least considered for use in an engine. In any case, there is technology out there that will allow us to go in that direction.
DLC will still do better lubricated, it just greatly reduces wear. This article did a test on some gears, the tl;dr is all 15 uncoated gears failed vs 3 of the 14 coated gears (2 of which were ran at a higher stress load).

https://gearsolutions.com/features/coating-applications-for-spur-gears/

Do you know if the DLC is the same or similar to that used in the firearm industry?
There are many “grades” of DLC, and a few different ways of applying it.
 
A lot of folks have been encouraging the move towards 0W-4. It will protect all the same.
 
A lot of folks have been encouraging the move towards 0W-4. It will protect all the same.
In general that is not correct. However, if the engine has been specially designed to tolerate such a thin oil then it will work adequately. MOFT is still king no matter how you slice it.

Note too that someone is paying for all of this redesign to tolerate such oils. The average price of a car reaching over $40,000 didn’t happen by itself and the relentless pursuit of CAFE goals doesn’t come cheap.
 
With going to lower and lower viscosity, it would seem there would come a time when the oil is so thin it's practically not there.
 
A 4,000 pound car (Toyota Crown) speced for 0W-8. HTHS probably < 2.0.
I don't think I'll ever want to buy a new Toyota (as nearly all of their new model's are speced for 0W-16 or 0W-8).
And they use the variable electric oil pumps which makes sure engine oil pressure is always at low end of what's adequate
to save tiny fractions of gasoline. I doubt any of these new Toyota's will make it to 200k miles.
 
Last edited:
A 4,000 pound car (Toyota Crown) speced for 0W-8. HTHS probably < 2.0.
I don't think I'll ever want to buy a new Toyota (as nearly all of their new model's are speced for 0W-16 or 0W-8).
And they use the variable electric oil pumps which makes sure engine oil pressure is always at low end of what's adequate
to save tiny fractions of gasoline. I doubt any of these new Toyota's will make it to 200k miles.
They have entire fleets that have made it to 200k with no issues. Having built race engines I can tell you that lower oil pressure is not a negative, the journals and pins will get lubricated all the same. No need to throw 60psi when 15psi lubricates the same. There is also a distinct difference between pressure and volume. We ain't using 10W-40 anymore...those days are long gone.
 
The HTHS of oils less than 20 weight is what worries me. If you google: HTHS wear graph, you'll see that engine wear goes up exponentially when HTHS goes below 2.6 (20 weight oils have HTHS of 2.6).

So when these engines running 0W-16 or 0W-8 are doing high RPM's with a heavily loaded car and AC on going up long inclines, and transmissions downshift and RPMS and engine temperatures increase, that is when these thin oils (which become thinner due to the high temperatures near the bearing's approaching 150C) the thin film strength may allow some metal on metal contact.

Also, Toyota's OEM oil filters have only 50% efficiency, and Toyota recommends 10k oil changes which from reading the posts on the Toyota nation site, seems to be taking hold among the Toyota owners. During a 10k oil change interval, any oil will sheer down at least 1 grade thinner which will decrease the HTHS near the end of the oil change interval. Also with a 50% efficiency oil filter, some decent size particles will remain in the thin oil and get in between the moving metal parts and the thin film strength of the hot and sheered oil may allow those particles to cause additonal wear.

So if I were to buy a used Toyota on Craigslist with say 100k miles on it, where the owner followed Toyota's recommendations of
0W-16/0W-8 oil with HTHS = 2.0 to 2.3, + 10,000 mile oil changes + 50% efficiency oil filters + electric variable pressure oil pump,
I would have a concern about the car's future longevity.

I'm sure most people blindly follow Toyota's recommendations and say if Toyota says it's ok, then it's ok, but I personally am turned off
and would probably avoid the car brands permanently that recommend the ultra thin oil with 10k oil change intervals, 50% efficiency filters.
I really used to like Toyota's vehicles. I owned two 1985 Toyota Camry's back in the 1980's and 1990's. I also almost bought a Toyota Previa back in the 1990's. If you google Toyota Previa's (1991-1997), they still have a loyal following with many going over 300k miles, which is very rare for other minivans. But it will be interesting to see the longevity of the new Sienna's speced for 0W-16.

Personally, I prefer a thick full synthetic 5W-30, with 4k oil change intervals, and Fram Ultra oil + air filters with 99%+ efficiency at 20 microns. I'm trying to bring engine wear down to 0, instead of just having "adequate" engine protection for the first 60k miles until the warranty runs out. Since all these same engines of brand new cars are speced for 5W-30 and even 5W-40 in Europe and Australia, all of us have the freedom to continue to use 5W-30 permanently even with new cars with no worries.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom