thin perhaps not as good as i thought

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: uart
Originally Posted By: MarkStock
Here's a great read that gives some insight on Honda's move to 0w20.

http://www.infineum.com/sitecollectiondocuments/notebooks/gf5/J Jetter Honda 042109.pdf

Looking forward to seeing how this gets twisted.

Ok I'm impressed. That's gotta be the second biggest 1.5% I've ever seen.
wink.gif


333bwhi.png



Now that's funny right there. Makes 1.5% look like 50%. And "fuel economy improvement" over what? 20W-50?
35.gif
 
Last edited:
Nah, it says against 5W-30 on the graph.

EC used to be against a reference 15W-40, and IIRC, was about 6% better in the test engine at the test point.

M1 0W-40 had EC on the bottle downunder for a period of time.
 
Its been said before that
1. Too much weight in the vehicle by overloading unnecessarily
2. Lack of maintenance eg spark plugs, air filter etc out of tune
3. Under inflated tyres
4. Lead foot "spirited driving" Krrapp
5. Correct fuel grade selection eg regular or premium
6. Selection of travel route eg off peak travel
7. Better planning to reduce the number of trips required
8. Walk or ride a push bike, use public transport train, bus.

These have a far greater impact on fuel economy savings than the grade of engine oil.

It is understood that

1 to 5 above no excuse for most.

6 to 8 may depend on your state of health, job or personal commitments/circumstances etc, however one would think that at least one day a week (or now and again) one could get by without the use of a vehicle.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Same Honda who are reducing their bearing radial clearances, and increasing the projected surface areas to improve the safety margin running 20 (and lower) oils ?

Both actions increase the drag of these energy conserving oils.

As to the linked puff piece, note that the back spec is to reduce greenhouse emissions - the new CAFE


Be careful when you mention CAFE here or the new CAFE, wow. Soon they'll tie it into some kind of conspiracy, then start reading your mind. LOL
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Same Honda who are reducing their bearing radial clearances, and increasing the projected surface areas to improve the safety margin running 20 (and lower) oils ?

Both actions increase the drag of these energy conserving oils.

As to the linked puff piece, note that the back spec is to reduce greenhouse emissions - the new CAFE


Be careful when you mention CAFE here or the new CAFE, wow. Soon they'll tie it into some kind of conspiracy, then start reading your mind. LOL


Yep, the tin foil hat line is getting old.

Read the stuff provided and the really IS Gov't involvement in the move to thin oils. OMG, it's as plain as the nose on your face.

I'm still going to use what I want. I pay very close attention to oils as longevity is a huge cost consideration here in our fleet. And if a new vehicle recommends a certain oil I will most likely use it, but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.

Then everybody is happy!
 
Quote:
but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.


Now if only demarpaint would have the courage to do the same, this thread would finally end.
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Same Honda who are reducing their bearing radial clearances, and increasing the projected surface areas to improve the safety margin running 20 (and lower) oils ?

Both actions increase the drag of these energy conserving oils.

As to the linked puff piece, note that the back spec is to reduce greenhouse emissions - the new CAFE


Be careful when you mention CAFE here or the new CAFE, wow. Soon they'll tie it into some kind of conspiracy, then start reading your mind. LOL


Yep, the tin foil hat line is getting old.

Read the stuff provided and the really IS Gov't involvement in the move to thin oils. OMG, it's as plain as the nose on your face.

I'm still going to use what I want. I pay very close attention to oils as longevity is a huge cost consideration here in our fleet. And if a new vehicle recommends a certain oil I will most likely use it, but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.

Then everybody is happy!
Well said Steve. You see as soon as the Gov't, Uncle Sam, or anything else that remotely implies the Gov't is mentioned, the conspiracy bomb is dropped. Then you're called paranoid, etc. I found it very entertaining, although a few times I had to watch the keyboard. I'm glad there are a few others who see it as I see it. I'm with you, I'll use what I think is best. The whole point of what I was trying to convey was having a choice and not have to worry about a warranty. Years ago we had warranties and choices, those days are gone. But like I said last night, I have the warranty issue covered, and still can have my cake and eat it. So all is fine and dandy here.

It seems some members would like us to believe our engines are engineered so well today that heat, severe service, towing, climate, etc. have no real impact on them. They even write nice articles about their testing and publish their results. These new engines and oils they call for have been tested, re-tested and tested again. Their design is perfect, and problem free. Did I miss anything? But then you read about OLM's being reprogrammed because the interval is to long causing problems. A BITOG member following the OLM and using the recommended oil having major engine problems. Coincidentally he wasn't the only one having a problem with that particular Honda engine. Then problems with fuel delivery, soot, and the oil companies are asked to design an oil to deal with the new technology issues. Then we have poor cylinder head designs forcing three revisions in less than a year, cam phaser issues, timing chain problems, sludge monsters, etc. Funny isn't it? Those engineers knew best though. Seems to me a lot of the testing falls on the consumer. Do all engines have problems? No. Are the engines and oils of today better than 10 years ago? Sure! Are all engines perfect and worry free? No. Does one size fit all? Sorry guys I still don't think so. JMO
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Read the stuff provided and the really IS Gov't involvement in the move to thin oils. OMG, it's as plain as the nose on your face.


I don't think anybody has contradicted this. Certainly I have plenty of posts where I stated that of course the govt is driving fuel economy up.

But so do European govts through fuel taxes.

Does that mean the diesel engines in Europe have not been engineered correctly? Or is it only with oil that engineers take short cuts to achieve fuel economy improvements?
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Quote:
but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.


Now if only demarpaint would have the courage to do the same, this thread would finally end.


I guess you skipped what I wrote last night, and this morning. I have my warranty issue covered, all is well. Would you like to end the thread now?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.

Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Quote:
but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.


Now if only demarpaint would have the courage to do the same, this thread would finally end.


I guess you skipped what I wrote last night, and this morning. I have my warranty issue covered, all is well. Would you like to end the thread now?
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.

Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Quote:
but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.


Now if only demarpaint would have the courage to do the same, this thread would finally end.


I guess you skipped what I wrote last night, and this morning. I have my warranty issue covered, all is well. Would you like to end the thread now?


For someone who skips my posts you have a lot to say about me, and you reply to me too. Oh yea you're a mind reader, my bad. I'll make it real easy for you, add me to your ignore list then the skipping will be automatic.
 
Sooooo, are you going to run something other than a 20-grade in your Jeep?

demarpaint said:
Oil Changer said:
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Sooooo, are you going to run something other than a 20-grade in your Jeep?

demarpaint said:
Oil Changer said:
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.
demarpaint said:
Bingo! We have a winner.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
Quote:
demarpaint: Sorry old chum, but you need to get back onto your medication. ( : < ) I'm saying that with a smile in the hopes that you will snap back to your normal analytical self.


Frank has some questions and thoughts about what best for his vehicle and you tell him get back on the meds because he disagrees with someone or questions what they say?
Agree or disagree there is no need to insinuate that someone has issues and needs meds.
Frank is a friend of mine and i know him to be a very reasonable guy. He deserves an apology.



1) It was a joke, son.

2) Demarpaint took it as such and, I think, saw the humor. If he needs or wants an apology, he can ask and get a heartfelt one, publicly or privately. He doesn't need you sanctimoniously asking on his behalf, which you do, I think, for reasons other than being his friend. I consider him a friend too... which is why I felt that I could call him on something in a humorous way when I thought he was off track.

3) Confirmed! You are even more priggish than I am. Could it be that we are both of German heritage?

Demarpaint, Frank, if you were offended, PM me. I'm not going to be looking at this thread much but if you want me to apologize here, I'll come back and do it.
 
So what are you going to run?

Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Sooooo, are you going to run something other than a 20-grade in your Jeep?

demarpaint said:
Oil Changer said:
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.
demarpaint said:
Bingo! We have a winner.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
So what are you going to run?

Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Sooooo, are you going to run something other than a 20-grade in your Jeep?

demarpaint said:
Oil Changer said:
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.
demarpaint said:
Bingo! We have a winner.


Suddenly you care, and you're reading my posts? I'll run what I see fit based on the time of year and how I plan on using the vehicle. Currently the perfect oil is in the sump.
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8


Read the stuff provided and the really IS Gov't involvement in the move to thin oils. OMG, it's as plain as the nose on your face.


No on ever said otherwise? I just said that it doens't result in a sub-optimal spec, because I haven't seen a shred of evidence that it does. Again, the suggestion is the false dichotomy that a more fuel-efficient oil = more wear. That doesn't seem to be the case.


Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
I'm still going to use what I want. I pay very close attention to oils as longevity is a huge cost consideration here in our fleet. And if a new vehicle recommends a certain oil I will most likely use it, but if my instincts say different it is my vehicle, right? Thus I'll do what I want, and the enviro-weenies can do what they want.

Then everybody is happy!


Me too! Warranty considerations aren't a concern, and frankly neither is fuel economy (as least as far as lubricant choice is concerned). Long-term wear is my biggest concern when choosing a lubricant, which is why I'm using a 0W20 oil in car spec'd for a 20W oil.
 
No, I don't care. Curiousity is all. And no, I have not read any of your posts that is not related to a direct question I asked you.

So if the boat deal goes down, what oil do you think you will use?

Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
So what are you going to run?

Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Sooooo, are you going to run something other than a 20-grade in your Jeep?

demarpaint said:
Oil Changer said:
Yes, I skip over your posts; they contain no useful information. So you're going to run something other than a 20-grade because you know better? Good for you.
demarpaint said:
Bingo! We have a winner.


Suddenly you care, and you're reading my posts? I'll run what I see fit based on the time of year and how I plan on using the vehicle. Currently the perfect oil is in the sump.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
No, I don't care. Curiousity is all. And no, I have not read any of your posts that is not related to a direct question I asked you.

So if the boat deal goes down, what oil do you think you will use?



Curiosity? Read my mind, the answer is there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom