You need toMake the connections.
No one has died using Mercedes level 3 technology.
. It may not be the best and is limited, but is doing the proper thing. It’s not
Killing people as Guinea pigs.
Cannot keep connecting the dots.
Tesla Full Self Driving (FSD)
- Thread starter Torrid
- Start date
No one has died using Mercedes level 3 technology.
. It may not be the best and is limited, but is doing the proper thing. It’s not
Killing people as Guinea pigs.
Cannot keep connecting the dots.
Yeah, that is REALLY cool and something I would have fun with too.
And FSD didn't kill anyone here. The driver did overriding the system.
FSD isn't perfect, but I'm all ears when you can show me PROOF of FSD causing the accident and someone being killed.
Again, causing the accident, not just being a vehicle involved.
Pw vs
Ignorance is bliss I guess.
Think of what you are saying and rich it is that you said it.
Absolute brain dead hater. Facts don't matter to you.
Agree, silly statements to the contrary. People pretend to be such experts in guilt without knowing the facts and before investigations are finished. Kind of like, let's say facing a criminal court in North Korea. *LOL* So sure Tesla is guilty of killing someone. The car just decided to nail the accelerator and go down a street at 70mph and adding to that, no brake was applied. Gee, I wonder why the driver blamed the car instead of himself... ok, the car can't talk, but it can and I suspect the resulting data will prove the driver wrong unless investigation finds a defect..
"Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla's head of AI, responded to Musk's post on X, claiming the self-driving mode was manually overridden.
"Yup. In this case, the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area. They reached a speed of 73 mph during the crash, and had the accelerator pressed even after the crash," he posted."
There you go ... two sides to every story and investigation will lead to the truth, we dont know that truth yet.
It's Tesla’s fault the driver overrode the feature. Right.
My wife too. Only she just wishes she could lower the volume of me cursing when some moron in a BMW, Tesla, MB, chopped Civic, large 4x4, and now because it's warm motorcyclist thinks they're at the Indy 500, drafting cars or weaving in and out at insane speeds. I always try for new and fresh curse combos, and other commentary. But that's getting tough.My wife has that … meplus I buy dinner
If thoughts are truly a sin I know where I'll be going when my time is up.
4wd
$50 site donor 2026
Normal - Robot Drivers will reach this point as wellMy wife too. Only she just wishes she could lower the volume of me cursing when some moron in a BMW, Tesla, MB, chopped Civic, large 4x4, and now because it's warm motorcyclist thinks they're at the Indy 500, drafting cars or weaving in and out at insane speeds. I always try for new and fresh curse combos, and other commentary. But that's getting tough.
Oops, you have never driven anything under the conditions you describe. All accept input from the driver to override. If collision avoidance brakes and driver depresses accelerator, the driver’s command overrides.
The Tesla on FSD was driven into the house with driver’s foot depressing the accelerator to the floor. Works exactly the same as cruise control, depress the accelerator to go faster.
Why does your cruise control not brake if you depress the accelerator?
In this case you conveniently forget it is “FSD (supervised)”. A driver’s command overrides all else. If it wasn’t convenient for your argument you wouldn’t have it any other way.
Not even in a Toyota will collision control override the driver’s accelerator pedal.
So say 99.9% of the drivers on the road.
I think that the jury is still out on the safety enhancing utility of Tesla's FSD implementation. We'll know the truth over the next couple of years. I do find the lack of radar troubling. Cost savings? Can't think of another reason.
