Completely agree SR5, making what's existing last as long as it can is a wise decision both environmentally and financially. What would made actual sense would to build a simple car that could last 3 000 000 km and the lifetime of a person and we have the tehcnology to do that. Let's reissue a car from the 90s that is simple and yet has all the needed safety and confort and build it with a stainless body, upgraded engine parts etc.
Interesting comments. I suspect a lot of what you want is going to come to pass... just not the way you're imagining.
Over here in the UK, from 2030 (ie in just 9 years time), the stated policy is you'll no longer be able to buy a conventional petrol or diesel car. Importantly nor will you be able to buy a conventional hybrid (like a Prius) because it won't be able to go the requisite distance on battery power alone. The future, we are told is pure EV!
Or it? EVs, even with subsidies, are ferociously expensive; at least double their ICE counterparts. The charging infrastructure doesn't exist; nor does adequate power generation capacity for a wholesale changeover. And then there's the range issue, especially in winter, where 125 miles max is optimistic.
So what will ACTUALLY happen as opposed to what idiot politicians say will happen? I think people will try & keep their existing ICE cars going for as long as possible. No doubt conventional motoring taxes will be significantly ramped up (starting soon?) with lots of fancy words about 'the green revolution' & the need to pay for the pandemic. People will I think just pay more for hanging on to the advantages an ICE confers. I honestly wonder if my little Suzuki, with its 72 mpg fuel economy, will become an object of desire, as opposed to a social embarrassment!
In a way, we're set to become the new Cuba, where they still have cars from the 1950s on the roads. Hurrah for us!