Gen3 Budack EA888 5w40 too thick?

Joined
Mar 13, 2021
Messages
139
I was discussing whether going up In viscosity in the later EA888 2.0T in Tiguans. They are calling for 0w20 Vw 508.00 so many Tiguans have oil burning issues. I think vw 504.00 would be better or even 502.00 since the early levering of this motor used 5w40.

The other poster states all these reasons why 0w20 is the better choice. Do you agree?



While fuel economy was a goal, engineers didn't just put thin oil in an old engine. They redesigned the hydraulics and clearances of the Gen 3B to rely on the flow characteristics of 0W-20 (VW 508.00).
Here are the specific mechanical changes from the older EA888 (Gen 1/2) to your Gen 3B that necessitate—and protect—the use of 0W-20.
1. The Variable Displacement Oil Pump (The "Flow" Argument)
This is the most critical mechanical difference.
• Old Gen 1/2: Used a fixed-volume or simplified regulated pump. Higher RPM = Higher Pressure. Thick oil (5W-40) worked fine because the pump just brute-forced it through.
• Gen 3B Design: Uses a fully variable vane pump controlled by the ECU. It targets specific Flow Volumes, not just pressure.
• The Physics of 508.00: The pump is calibrated for the viscosity of 0W-20.
• If you use 5W-40: The thicker fluid creates higher resistance (pressure) immediately. The pump detects this "high pressure" and retracts the vanes to lower the output.
• The Result: You actually get LESS OIL FLOW (volume) across the bearings with 5W-40 because the pump is trying to compensate for the high pressure.
• Why 0W-20 wins: It flows freely, allowing the pump to keep the vanes open, flooding the bearings with high-volume cooling flow rather than just high-pressure static fluid.
2. The "Budack Cycle" Combustion (Thermal Management)
The "B" in Gen 3B stands for the Budack Cycle. This is why your engine runs cooler than a GTI engine.
• The Design: The intake valves close early (before the piston reaches the bottom on the intake stroke).
• The Effect: This lowers the "effective" compression ratio, which significantly lowers the Peak Combustion Temperature.
• The Oil Link: Because the combustion process itself is cooler than a standard Otto cycle engine, the oil is subjected to less thermal stress. This allows the lower HTHS (High Temperature High Shear) rating of 0W-20 (2.6 mPas) to survive where it might fail in a hotter running Gen 2 engine.
3. Tighter Bearing Clearances & Micro-Finishing
• Main & Rod Bearings: The Gen 3B uses tighter bearing clearances than previous generations.
• The Mechanism: A tighter gap requires a thinner fluid to enter and establish a wedge quickly, especially on cold starts.
• The Risk: 5W-40 is too thick to enter these tight clearances instantly upon startup (where 90% of wear occurs). 0W-20 penetrates immediately.
4. The Piston Ring Pack (Low Tension)
• The Change: As already mentioned the rings have lower spring tension to reduce friction.
• The Oil Link: A thick 5W-40 oil film can actually be too thick for these low-tension oil control rings to scrape effectively, leading to more oil consumption (the ring "hydroplanes" over the oil rather than scraping it).
• 508.00 Spec: The 0W-20 is designed to break surface tension easily, allowing the low-tension rings to scrape the cylinder wall clean.
5. The Chemistry of VW 508.00 (It's not just "thin oil")
• Zirconium Marker: VW 508.00 oil contains Zirconium as a chemical marker (and is dyed green). This isn't just for looks; it's to verify the correct additive package is present.
• No Calcium: 508.00 formulas (like your Liqui Moly 6200) often reduce Calcium detergents (which cause LSPI/Knock) and replace them with Magnesium. Old school 502.00 5W-40s are often high-calcium, which promotes Low Speed Pre-Ignition in these engines.
 
I was discussing whether going up In viscosity in the later EA888 2.0T in Tiguans. They are calling for 0w20 Vw 508.00 so many Tiguans have oil burning issues. I think vw 504.00 would be better or even 502.00 since the early levering of this motor used 5w40.

The other poster states all these reasons why 0w20 is the better choice. Do you agree?



While fuel economy was a goal, engineers didn't just put thin oil in an old engine. They redesigned the hydraulics and clearances of the Gen 3B to rely on the flow characteristics of 0W-20 (VW 508.00).
Here are the specific mechanical changes from the older EA888 (Gen 1/2) to your Gen 3B that necessitate—and protect—the use of 0W-20.
1. The Variable Displacement Oil Pump (The "Flow" Argument)
This is the most critical mechanical difference.
• Old Gen 1/2: Used a fixed-volume or simplified regulated pump. Higher RPM = Higher Pressure. Thick oil (5W-40) worked fine because the pump just brute-forced it through.
• Gen 3B Design: Uses a fully variable vane pump controlled by the ECU. It targets specific Flow Volumes, not just pressure.
• The Physics of 508.00: The pump is calibrated for the viscosity of 0W-20.
• If you use 5W-40: The thicker fluid creates higher resistance (pressure) immediately. The pump detects this "high pressure" and retracts the vanes to lower the output.
• The Result: You actually get LESS OIL FLOW (volume) across the bearings with 5W-40 because the pump is trying to compensate for the high pressure.
• Why 0W-20 wins: It flows freely, allowing the pump to keep the vanes open, flooding the bearings with high-volume cooling flow rather than just high-pressure static fluid.
2. The "Budack Cycle" Combustion (Thermal Management)
The "B" in Gen 3B stands for the Budack Cycle. This is why your engine runs cooler than a GTI engine.
• The Design: The intake valves close early (before the piston reaches the bottom on the intake stroke).
• The Effect: This lowers the "effective" compression ratio, which significantly lowers the Peak Combustion Temperature.
• The Oil Link: Because the combustion process itself is cooler than a standard Otto cycle engine, the oil is subjected to less thermal stress. This allows the lower HTHS (High Temperature High Shear) rating of 0W-20 (2.6 mPas) to survive where it might fail in a hotter running Gen 2 engine.
3. Tighter Bearing Clearances & Micro-Finishing
• Main & Rod Bearings: The Gen 3B uses tighter bearing clearances than previous generations.
• The Mechanism: A tighter gap requires a thinner fluid to enter and establish a wedge quickly, especially on cold starts.
• The Risk: 5W-40 is too thick to enter these tight clearances instantly upon startup (where 90% of wear occurs). 0W-20 penetrates immediately.
4. The Piston Ring Pack (Low Tension)
• The Change: As already mentioned the rings have lower spring tension to reduce friction.
• The Oil Link: A thick 5W-40 oil film can actually be too thick for these low-tension oil control rings to scrape effectively, leading to more oil consumption (the ring "hydroplanes" over the oil rather than scraping it).
• 508.00 Spec: The 0W-20 is designed to break surface tension easily, allowing the low-tension rings to scrape the cylinder wall clean.
5. The Chemistry of VW 508.00 (It's not just "thin oil")
• Zirconium Marker: VW 508.00 oil contains Zirconium as a chemical marker (and is dyed green). This isn't just for looks; it's to verify the correct additive package is present.
• No Calcium: 508.00 formulas (like your Liqui Moly 6200) often reduce Calcium detergents (which cause LSPI/Knock) and replace them with Magnesium. Old school 502.00 5W-40s are often high-calcium, which promotes Low Speed Pre-Ignition in these engines.

LSPI: False because 40 grades are not beholden to the same phosphorus limits as thinner grades. The higher phosphorus prevents LSPI however I've yet to see a euro oil which doesn't have the Ca/Mg ratio that is so common with SP oils or doesn't meet the performance requirements for SP.

During cold start a 20 will be significantly thicker than a 40 grade at operating temp. At operating temperatures there's not a huge difference in viscosity (see example below) so the oil pumps would fail on the recommended grade.
1000001394.webp

As for bearing clearance when engineering for thinner grades the load spread out further than bearings with loser clearances where the oil wedge is condensed around a narrower portion of the bearing.

Anecdotally BMW has been using a variable displacement oil pump and MAP controlled oil pressure tables while recommending 20 through 5w40 for the same engine
 
Last edited:
I decided to go with Amsoil European 0W-30 for my Audi with the Gen 4 EA888. Meets (or exceeds) VW/Audi 504.00. There's quite a jump between the 0W-20 to their 0W-30 in Kinematic Viscosity @ 100C: 8.1 vs 12.3. HTHS goes from 2.7 to 3.5. @Pablo is the resident Amsoil expert, dealer, and forum supporter. He'd be happy to answer questions you may have.

I didn't keep the Audi long enough to see if it would develop oil consumption issues. Are people speculating this is due to the low viscosity alone, or related to engine design in general? Is the Gen3B direct injection only, or port and/or multi-port injected? Are engines wearing, or is the consumption due to carbon deposits having caused rings to stick?
 
I used Liqui Moly Top Tech 6200 for the majority of the time we owned the 2019 Tiguan. We had just over 60,000 miles on the car and it didn't burn a drop of oil. If those engines are burning oil, it would be wise to change out the PVC/Oil separator.
 
For the 534th time, no it is not too thick.

There is so much misinformation and deep crapola in that post it would be hard to dissect it line-by-line to even discuss it.

Where does this nonsense come from?
AI now, used to be the interwebs, before that some books, then some guy on a small mountain, and way back, dude in a cave.
 
For the 534th time, no it is not too thick.

There is so much misinformation and deep crapola in that post it would be hard to dissect it line-by-line to even discuss it.

Where does this nonsense come from?
Fear driven by the automakers. I had a BMW salesperson say that our warranty could be voided if I permeantly disabled the stop/start.
I'm assuming it was BMW who told FCPEuro that a batch of oil pumps failed because the oil used was "too thick".

 
Its not to thick......same engine as Golf R Correct? Guy in my club runs Mobil 1 0w40......
 
Last edited:
OMG!!!!!! I just realized..... i'm a complete idiot!!!!! I NEED 0w-20 to penetrate my tight little bearing hole clearances which the viscosity of 5w-40 can't satisfy...... I'm dumping the 5w-40 out of two engines that spec 0w-20 ASAP
 
Presumably, the 0W-20 will provide reasonable protection for the engine. Assuming this, why jump all the way up to 40 weight? Increased margin of safety against wear? Wouldn't 30 weight be a reasonable step up from 20, without having to jump two grades?
 
For the 534th time, no it is not too thick.

There is so much misinformation and deep crapola in that post it would be hard to dissect it line-by-line to even discuss it.

Where does this nonsense come from?
“I know all details of lubrication of EA888. I do struggle a bit with tribology fundamentals.”
 
Presumably, the 0W-20 will provide reasonable protection for the engine. Assuming this, why jump all the way up to 40 weight? Increased margin of safety against wear? Wouldn't 30 weight be a reasonable step up from 20, without having to jump two grades?
It is also common for the engines to dilute the oil with fuel. It’s not about “weight” either, the increase in HT/HS with a 502 00 or 504 00 oil over a 508 00 is not about a 30- or -40 weight, that’s relatively insignificant.

Plus exacting out 2% fuel economy improvement is not my primary concern.

But really the discussion here is about the gross misinformation in that post.
 
Back
Top Bottom