Did we ever get a test on this filter?I know you aren't asking me, but if Fleetguard has a Stratapore for your application, I'd recommend that route. What's the GM filter #?
The merc racing filter is basically an EAO.
Did we ever get a test on this filter?I know you aren't asking me, but if Fleetguard has a Stratapore for your application, I'd recommend that route. What's the GM filter #?
So does yours! 👍🏻that sounds like a really cool engine and a whole lotta power.
Nope, we don't have any test data for it, the new Ultra or the EaO unfortunately. Just the advertised specs.Did we ever get a test on this filter?
The merc racing filter is basically an EAO.
I didnt see one.Nope, we don't have any test data for it, the new Ultra or the EaO unfortunately. Just the advertised specs.
Forgive me if I asked this already, but do we have any efficiency data for the Merc Racing filter?
97% @ I assume 20 microns (doesn't explicitly say), so not quite as efficient as the EaO or RP, but pretty darn close. Looks like a great filter!
Other than the seam… wonder why they didn’t use a metal crimp.97% @ I assume 20 microns (doesn't explicitly say), so not quite as efficient as the EaO or RP, but pretty darn close. Looks like a great filter!
Thermal weld, you see that on some of the synthetic filters.Other than the seam… wonder why they didn’t use a metal crimp.
Yeah, I've seen it and know what it is. But on a filter that is surely premium cost, it would be nice to see premium construction throughout.Thermal weld, you see that on some of the synthetic filters.
Other than the seam… wonder why they didn’t use a metal crimp.
This filter certainly isnt the best I've seen.Yeah, I've seen it and know what it is. But on a filter that is surely premium cost, it would be nice to see premium construction throughout.
Double foot... folded over media? Not sure what you meant. Please explain.Looks like a HD SP5 - if they are build the same that seam is a double foot and glued... it aint coming apart.
Double foot... folded over media? Not sure what you meant. Please explain.
I use Baldwin filters in everything I own. I order them from Application Associates.thank you for the insight and feedback. what oil filter you fancy?
Hans was a well known lobe designer. In the 80s Super Shops owned Erson (& Mallory) located at the Carson City location, hired Tanzi to make or break the Erson brand. The lobe selection at the time was dismal, so Hans was paid to design about 400 new Berco masters.Yes, and spec’d it when Steve Tanzi was still HMIC… probably 2005-2007 timeframe? These are Hans Hermann-designed profiles, not sure who he is but I know Steve was very hot on their capabilities.
I can tell you had some inside experience....Hans was a well known lobe designer. In the 80s Super Shops owned Erson (& Mallory) located at the Carson City location, hired Tanzi to make or break the Erson brand. The lobe selection at the time was dismal, so Hans was paid to design about 400 new Berco masters.
Due to the fact Erson & Mallory pulled a trailer to all the national NHRA events to service magnetos, Erson cams ended up in many of the cars that were running Mallory mags. Fuel cams wear quickly on the exhaust side especially opening the valve against high pressure from the late burning fuel, so cam and magneto service went hand in hand. Records were set over and over with the .375s lobes, not because they were agressive, but because they were stable and didn't beat up the valvetrain with the instant idle to full rpm of blown fuel engines off the line. The big cam cores
"grew" the lobe durations a couple of degrees so a 296 @ 50 intake lobe would measure out to 298-300ish. The exhaust duration on fuel cams were usually 4-6 degrees less on 111-113 LCAs.
Fast foward 20 years, in 2004 #2 guy at Erson, John Steely went to Oshkosh, WI to make or break Howard's Cams. A year or two later Erson was a dumpster fire.
Tanzi would have ground 5 degrees advance into that 242/254 cam because he liked to put the intake L/C @ 108 on just about everything.I can tell you had some inside experience....![]()
I agree, Steve initially did want to cut it with less separation. But at the time, my brother was convinced he was going to be racing it frequently (VIR is nearby) and spraying every time, so after some discussion Tanzi relented and said since it was going to be bottle-fed all the time he could justify the low-end loss of torque because of the lack of advance. He still suggested the possibility of advancing it 2 or 4 degrees with the timing set... like a Hex-A-Just or belt drive.Tanzi would have ground 5 degrees advance into that 242/254 cam because he liked to put the intake L/C @ 108 on just about everything.
In that case your timing card would read Int; 13/49 exh; 65/9
Direct injection engines should be less sensitive to overlap. Remember you read it here first.
I am not sure, but fram its the ph30 or 30 ending numbers.I know you aren't asking me, but if Fleetguard has a Stratapore for your application, I'd recommend that route. What's the GM filter #?
Looks like it crosses to the:I am not sure, but fram its the ph30 or 30 ending numbers.