Oil Brand consideration Mobil 1 to Kirkland

I was always curious how we exactly know (putting aside their marketing information) if they exceed approvals, especially by “far”?
We don’t and it’s a problem IMO. In my personal experience it’s been dealing with stuck oil rings and engine cleanliness. I’ve seen differences between brands in those departments.
 
We don’t and it’s a problem IMO. In my personal experience it’s been dealing with stuck oil rings and engine cleanliness. I’ve seen differences between brands in those departments.
Agreed, any claims of exceeding specs are not easily verifiable unless independent tests are done which is very expensive, so its a bit of an unknown
 
We don’t and it’s a problem IMO. In my personal experience it’s been dealing with stuck oil rings and engine cleanliness. I’ve seen differences between brands in those departments.
IMO, there isn't alot of differences in the oil as the specs have tightened over the years, but certain engines probably work better with the additives in a given oil. A higher calcuim additive may work better in a GM 5.3 vs the Ford ecoboost which may better off with higher boron or moly. Probably more on the different engines than oil. A 3.6 Chrysler engine may go with any Dexos Gen 3 oil easily on10,000 mile oil changes where an ecoboost may be needed to an oil change on a name brand oil at 5,000 miles due to fuel dilution??
 
I was always curious how we exactly know (putting aside their marketing information) if they exceed approvals, especially by “far”?

Kirkland says this:

Controls friction and engine wear better than the latest API SP requirement, especially during cold starts.

So they also exceed?
I mean, there is that Engineering Explained video where Mobil shows by how much Mobil 1 exceeds the requirements, and then how much further still EP exceeds them, so, that's something I guess? Would be better to have more data of course.
 
This isn’t a guarantee of performance but I do enjoy comparing things like pour point, Noack, virgin oxidation etc. to find clues of ingredient quality. The use of ester, pao, and an’s are things I like in a formula.
 
Meet or exceeds. After market parts are always saying Meets or exceeds OEM specification. Some fail in months continually. That phrase means nothing at all to me as proven to me time and time again to be based on opinion. Some items just dont meet any rating they say they do. However I Know I am talking Apples a mushrooms. Point Provf it to me, rather us.
 
There is a UOA on here comparing Mobil 1 o-20 to Kirkland 0-20 in same vehicle for 10k and they are identical results. Everything normal.
Now do it over time instead of one singular data point, which is inconsequential and absolutely worthless in statistical analysis.
 
You can't really make that determination with a UOA though, they don't have the resolution to compare different oils to each other, you'd really need to perform teardown testing to ascertain what the difference is, if any.
Booya
 
And sometimes exceeding the spec makes zero difference in the engine longevity vs just meeting the spec…
True, but with what seems to be an increasing number of issues with oil control and the oil control rings coking up, it's starting to look like it might with newer engines.
 
True, but with what seems to be an increasing number of issues with oil control and the oil control rings coking up, it's starting to look like it might with newer engines.
What im starting to belive is it doesent matter much to any engine component but the piston and ring coking. Once problems begin here its all downhill.
 
What im starting to belive is it doesent matter much to any engine component but the piston and ring coking. Once problems begin here its all downhill.
I thought the best remedy for ring cooking is short OCI, I doubt Mobil1 vs Kirkland will make any difference if you change your oil ever 4-5k miles.
 
I thought the best remedy for ring cooking is short OCI, I doubt Mobil1 vs Kirkland will make any difference if you change your oil ever 4-5k miles.
The best idea would be to use an oil that's highly resistant to coking. An oil comprised of extremely light base stocks will be more inclined to coke when spending time in the presence of combustion gasses and heat.
 
The best idea would be to use an oil that's highly resistant to coking. An oil comprised of extremely light base stocks will be more inclined to coke when spending time in the presence of combustion gasses and heat.
Makes sense, but we are comparing Mobil1 to Kirkland, do you think there is big difference in the base stocks between them?
 
Back
Top