Originally Posted By: bigt61
Nice - thanks for posting. Interesting that the VI for the 0W-20 is significantly higher than for the 0W-40. Caterham may be able to shed some light on that.
A 174 VI vs 169 for their 0W-40 isn't really a significant difference. Having a nominal 170 VI for any 0W-XX oil is par for the course. The purpose 0W-XX formulations that have high 185+ VIs is to be lighter at more typical start-up temp's.
I think the Castrol PDS info is still a disappointment. No actual HTHSV spec's except for GC . And no MRV or CCS spec's.
BTW the 159 VI for their 5w30 is one of the lowest VIs for the grade, worse than many dino's, meaning it's a heavy oil on start-up. It's very high CCS of 5,554cP (thanks to PQIA) is a further indication of how heavy this oil is compared to it's peers.
But it's also one of the cleanest burning oils available based on it's very low TEOST deposit score.
Of course neither the CCS nor TEOST score are provided on the PDS
of most companies. It just goes to show how limited the usefulness of most company PDS's are.