Because of some favorable oil analysises using the new Mobil 1 supersyn, I began to wonder if the new formulation of their 15W50 was still suitable for use in motorcycles sharing a common oil source with a wet clutch and tranmission. I sent them an email and their response was as follows:
>Mobil1 15W50 and 0W40 should not be use in wet >clutch applications due friction modifiers in >the motor oil because of the new API service >rating of "SL". You would have to use the >motorcycle motor oils to ensure that you do not >have any wet clutch problems.
Interestingly enough, the author of Motorcycle Motor Oil at tp://www.yft.org/tex_vfr/tech/oil.htm states that he was assured by Mobil that it was suitable.
From the virgin analysis I've seen, the only additional friction modifier is a bit of moly. This hardly seems to be enough to cause clutch slippage. And if it is, what about the people using Redline in their wet clutch bikes? Generally only the "energy conserving" oils (which the new supersyn 15W50 is not)have caused problems with wet clutches.
Anyone care to share their thoughts about this?
>Mobil1 15W50 and 0W40 should not be use in wet >clutch applications due friction modifiers in >the motor oil because of the new API service >rating of "SL". You would have to use the >motorcycle motor oils to ensure that you do not >have any wet clutch problems.
Interestingly enough, the author of Motorcycle Motor Oil at tp://www.yft.org/tex_vfr/tech/oil.htm states that he was assured by Mobil that it was suitable.
From the virgin analysis I've seen, the only additional friction modifier is a bit of moly. This hardly seems to be enough to cause clutch slippage. And if it is, what about the people using Redline in their wet clutch bikes? Generally only the "energy conserving" oils (which the new supersyn 15W50 is not)have caused problems with wet clutches.
Anyone care to share their thoughts about this?