It appears the Lambo's German roots are showing vs the Enzo's pure Italian heritage; i.e. the oil temps more closely matching the coolant temp.
I think the Lambo experiment with light PCMO's is a more severe test than the Enzo. Not just the 7.9 cSt oil vs the 8.6 cSt in the Enzo but the higher oil temps and more mileage, as low as it is.
Even so, you appear to still have a sufficiently large cushion from bearing wiping with a 7.9 k'vis. I'm guessing the design minimum vis (HTHS) for the engine is somewhere in the 4.0 cP area.
Plus you have the advantage of running a very light oil (relative to the spec' grade) at start-up and during warm-up
which can only be beneficial in terms of minimizing wear not to mention the piece of mind of not having to be so concerned when 'giving it the beans' before the engine is 100% up to temperature.
Seems like a win-win to me.
I think the Lambo experiment with light PCMO's is a more severe test than the Enzo. Not just the 7.9 cSt oil vs the 8.6 cSt in the Enzo but the higher oil temps and more mileage, as low as it is.
Even so, you appear to still have a sufficiently large cushion from bearing wiping with a 7.9 k'vis. I'm guessing the design minimum vis (HTHS) for the engine is somewhere in the 4.0 cP area.
Plus you have the advantage of running a very light oil (relative to the spec' grade) at start-up and during warm-up
which can only be beneficial in terms of minimizing wear not to mention the piece of mind of not having to be so concerned when 'giving it the beans' before the engine is 100% up to temperature.
Seems like a win-win to me.