Interesting unverified statistic- if you earn more than $30k USD annually

What other nations have you lived in and how long did you live in those nations that one lives well for under $1k USD per month, and have lots of money free for other luxuries?
A while back wife / I did Italy living on so little money (under $500/month) and had remote job. It was smaller town. Everything was cheaper
 
Likely true but it also means you live in the country with the highest cost of living.

Its like saying the average worker in silicon valley earns more than the top 10% in South Carolina. Looks appealing till you figure out how much a house in Silicon valley costs
This.

1 USD has a different value depending on where you are. You can probably live like a king with 20 mistresses if you make 30K in a warzone in Africa, and eat steaks every night. The only value money has is distribution of assets and services. If you cannot move your assets and services across locations then the price will be different. A home in my city would be way higher than the same one in New Mexico because the job pays more here, etc. Sure you can transport a car around to balance the market price, but you can't do that to a house.

The problem with these comparison between nations is that you won't make high income living in low cost of living area. Employers and customers won't pay you the same as high cost of living areas.
 
Last edited:
My assumption from the unverified quote was the American standard of living, even at $30k USD, was higher than 99 percent of the people in the world.
 
My assumption from the unverified quote was the American standard of living, even at $30k USD, was higher than 99 percent of the people in the world.
Well first your math is off, because 1% of the worlds population is 80M, so if you had $30K annual income you definitely would not be in the top 25% of even the United States. The top 25% of US citizens would be pretty much 1% of world population, and that demographic starts around $100K/ year.

Second, its all about context. Would I be better off being in the bottom 20% of income earners in the USA, vs say the top 50% of income earners in Spain, Italy, Greece, Costa Rica, etc. I think this is debatable.

The point of this statement is that US citizens are generally pretty well off compared to most of the world. Realize of course half the world's population lives in absolute squalor - so this is another one of those data-sets that really isn't reasonable to make such comparisons.
 
Heard this statistic earlier today. I am not able to verify the statistic, but found the statistic very thought provoking and gives another view on perspective:

If you earn over $30k USD annually, you are in the top one percent of the world's earners......
My buddy will be glad to hear this. Whenever I “complain” or “whine” about my job, he says, how would you like to trade checks?

He told me his got a perfect rating which meant 2.x% merit increase and he told me how much and go ahead and calculate my hourly. It turned out to be $18.75/hr which I guess puts him into the top 1/2 of 1% worldwide.
 
I
Well first your math is off, because 1% of the worlds population is 80M, so if you had $30K annual income you definitely would not be in the top 25% of even the United States. The top 25% of US citizens would be pretty much 1% of world population, and that demographic starts around $100K/ year.

Second, its all about context. Would I be better off being in the bottom 20% of income earners in the USA, vs say the top 50% of income earners in Spain, Italy, Greece, Costa Rica, etc. I think this is debatable.

The point of this statement is that US citizens are generally pretty well off compared to most of the world. Realize of course half the world's population lives in absolute squalor - so this is another one of those data-sets that really isn't reasonable to make such comparisons.
It wasn't my math.

The discussion point is the spirit and intent of what the quote theorizes. As you capture when you stated: "The point of this statement is that US citizens are generally pretty well off compared to most of the world."
 
PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) has entered the chat.
PPP in itself is subject to interpretation.

In third world and developing countries, even personal hygiene items that meet western world standards retail at or often more that what is priced in the western world. When working in third world or developing nations, I always stock up on deodorant, toothpaste, dental floss, etc--- as I know I will pay significantly more "on the local economy" for western quality personal hygiene items than I will pay for in the western world/ U.S.
 
PPP in itself is subject to interpretation.

In third world and developing countries, even personal hygiene items that meet western world standards retail at or often more that what is priced in the western world. When working in third world or developing nations, I always stock up on deodorant, toothpaste, dental floss, etc--- as I know I will pay more "on the local economy" that I will pay for in the western world/ U.S.
The most famous one is to use the Big Mac Index as a proxy for PPP.
 
I

It wasn't my math.

The discussion point is the spirit and intent of what the quote theorizes. As you capture when you stated: "The point of this statement is that US citizens are generally pretty well off compared to most of the world."
Anyone playing fast and loose with numbers that are easy to quantify usually has an agenda. I don't actually think my statement is what is being implied - not by you but with whomever started this misnomer. To me its more a "suck it up you ingrate" comment to the working poor.
 
Well first your math is off, because 1% of the worlds population is 80M, so if you had $30K annual income you definitely would not be in the top 25% of even the United States. The top 25% of US citizens would be pretty much 1% of world population, and that demographic starts around $100K/ year.

Second, its all about context. Would I be better off being in the bottom 20% of income earners in the USA, vs say the top 50% of income earners in Spain, Italy, Greece, Costa Rica, etc. I think this is debatable.


The point of this statement is that US citizens are generally pretty well off compared to most of the world. Realize of course half the world's population lives in absolute squalor - so this is another one of those data-sets that really isn't reasonable to make such comparisons.
Isn't the bottom 20% in the US is either unemployed, or working 60+ hours at 3 part time jobs just keep a roof overhead in a not great neighborhood, no vacations, kids at an underfunded school? Probably not much if any health insurance either?
I would say there is no comparison between the top half income earners in the countries you listed vs the bottom 20% in the US?

The family in the EU even at just the average income, is living pretty well compared to that, no worries if junior breaks his arm, and he can go to a good university almost for free if he earns his spot. They probably only have one small vehicle, but they aren't spending 10 hrs a week in it either. They have 4-5 weeks off paid vacation.

I think the US and Canada are great to live in, if you are in the top third income, just like everywhere, but probably not the best at the lower third compared to the EU.
 
Isn't the bottom 20% in the US is either unemployed, or working 60+ hours at 3 part time jobs just keep a roof overhead in a not great neighborhood, no vacations, kids at an underfunded school? Probably not much if any health insurance either?
I would say there is no comparison between the top half income earners in the countries you listed vs the bottom 20% in the US?

The family in the EU even at just the average income, is living pretty well compared to that, no worries if junior breaks his arm, and he can go to a good university almost for free if he earns his spot. They probably only have one small vehicle, but they aren't spending 10 hrs a week in it either. They have 4-5 weeks off paid vacation.

I think the US and Canada are great to live in, if you are in the top third income, just like everywhere, but probably not the best at the lower third compared to the EU.
The comparison is being made by the original statement - because that is what the numbers imply. $30K in the US puts you in the bottom quintile in the USA - the bottom 20%. So by outright definition your at minimum worse off than 4% of the worlds population in the USA alone.

So I think your arguing with me, but we agree? That was my point.
 
Heard this statistic earlier today. I am not able to verify the statistic, but found the statistic very thought provoking and gives another view on perspective:

If you earn over $30k USD annually, you are in the top one percent of the world's earners......
Its probably technically accurate but its a mostly worthless "stat". Economies are local and regional. $30K dollars (or equivalent) will have vastly different buying power across the globe. Even state to state or rural areas to metros.
 
More sleuthing.

As mentioned, in the USA 240M people would make more than you.

Eurozone median income is well above $30K - so lets call that half of 350M, so 175M

China median income is above $30K. So lets call that also at least half so 700M.

So already, I am at about 1.1B out of 8B total so already 14% make more than you. Without even touching cost of living.
 
Last edited:
Isn't the bottom 20% in the US is either unemployed, or working 60+ hours at 3 part time jobs just keep a roof overhead in a not great neighborhood, no vacations, kids at an underfunded school? Probably not much if any health insurance either?
I would say there is no comparison between the top half income earners in the countries you listed vs the bottom 20% in the US?

The family in the EU even at just the average income, is living pretty well compared to that, no worries if junior breaks his arm, and he can go to a good university almost for free if he earns his spot. They probably only have one small vehicle, but they aren't spending 10 hrs a week in it either. They have 4-5 weeks off paid vacation.

I think the US and Canada are great to live in, if you are in the top third income, just like everywhere, but probably not the best at the lower third compared to the EU.
This.
Comparing the US to a lot of the world's nations based upon income is very much an apples to oranges comparison.
Very low cost good healthcare and very inexpensive post secondary education are things we don't have in our country, nor do we have well developed urban transit systems or walkable cities, not to mention plenty of PTO. Our infrastructure from highways to airports is also substandard as compared to most of the developed world.
There are advantages enjoyed in most of the developed world that we lack here.
This is not a rap on our country either. We can always crib policies from the examples of others, although we seem not to like doing so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pew
Back
Top Bottom