Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Different world now then with what happened with Chrysler. I don't remember the demands (like firing CEO, killing off models and lines) that GM is being forced to do.
If I remember correctly, when the Government bailed our Chrysler back then, everybody took a pay cut with the exception of the secretaries.
Ok, Did the $$ come with FIRINGS? Specific lines to cut? Specific models not to make?
A "Czar" to answer to?
And lets see... How well is Chrysler doing right now?
When you ALLOW companies to fail, *if* they come back they most of the time get better.
When you bail them out, they fail more times then not.
The old give a fish vs teaching someone how to fish.
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Different world now then with what happened with Chrysler. I don't remember the demands (like firing CEO, killing off models and lines) that GM is being forced to do.
If I remember correctly, when the Government bailed our Chrysler back then, everybody took a pay cut with the exception of the secretaries.
Ok, Did the $$ come with FIRINGS? Specific lines to cut? Specific models not to make?
A "Czar" to answer to?
And lets see... How well is Chrysler doing right now?
When you ALLOW companies to fail, *if* they come back they most of the time get better.
When you bail them out, they fail more times then not.
The old give a fish vs teaching someone how to fish.