I drive one everyday, and agree.......they need to offer some granny ratios in the work trucks, maybee even 4.88. I wish my 6.0\6l90e had a 5.11. I think it about fuel economy in a bubble, not in the real world.You read my mind! I was about to look up the transmission ratios, but you beat me to it. The Ford mostly ran in 4th gear during the climb, as is visible on the gauge cluster. After they got the truck up to speed at the beginning, the driver backed off the throttle, and it upshifted for a little while but couldn't maintain speed in 5th, then went back to 4th. Further into the climb, he had it floored, and the 7.3 roared along at 4800 or so for a long time, then lugged down to 4200. At the very end of the run, the hill gets more steep, and the engine lugged down to 4000, then the trans downshifted to 3rd, bringing the engine speed up to 4600. Then they had to back off after a few seconds as they got into traffic at the tunnel entrance. The GM truck didn't have a gear indicator, so it's tough to know what was going on there. The good gear ratio for the Ford was 1.77 x 4.3 = 7.611 The GM didn't have that kind of overall gearing available. In 2nd, it is 8.84, and 3rd is 5.78. The 'tweener gears that Ford's 10-speed has are key. If the GM had dropped to 2nd, the engine would have had to run at 14% higher rpm than the Ford, and would have been buzzing 5400 rpm most of the time. But the driver would have had the option of backing off slightly to maintain a decent speed. If the GM held 3rd gear, the engine would have been running 24% lower rpm, or about 3600 rpm. This is below torque peak rpm of the L8T, and is probably why it fell flat on its face. Transmission programming for heavy vehicles shouldn't allow the engine to drop below torque peak rpm.Originally Posted by SnagglefootThe Ford has a 4.3 rear end. That was apparent in the conversation at the end of the test. The GM had a 3.73. Apples and oranges. Here are the gear ratios of the Ford transmission: 4.7 2.99 2.14 1.77 1.52 1.27 1.0 .85 .64 The Chev has the 6 speed The ratios were: 4.06 2.37 1.55 1.16 0.85 0.67 From watching the video, the Ford operates in two gears. I believe the guy said the test was run with gears 2 through 5. The Chev equivalent would have been 2 and 3. So with the two trucks in second gear the Ford would have been at a multiplier 4.3 x 2.99 = 12.9 The Chev would have been 3.73 x 2.37 = 8.8 The gearing differed by (12.9-8.8)/12.9 = 32%. They were testing two sets of drivelines. The engines didn't have much to do with the result. Certainly Chevy could do better. Offering something like a 4.11 would be a start. Please go ahead and see if you can confirm which two gears were being used by the Ford. It was cruising at about 5800 rpm, shifted so it was at 4200 then shifted back down to be at 5800 rpm.
Doubt it. It would be way more expensive than a Duramax and still nowhere as useful as the diesel is. This isn’t 1990 anymore.They should just get over it and offer an LSX 454 for the HD trucks, it will sell like hotcakes.
My current work truck is a 15 gmc 3500 drw 4x4 6.0 gasser. This was my personal truck, until I sold my DMax 3500, and turned it into my daily work truck.....anyway it just broke 80000 miles........Before it life as my work truck, it would generally be used to tow my 5th wheel. (12000 lbs actual) to the beach, in the mountains and so on. There is one pass on 421 in NC westbound toward Boone.........12 miles, 6-8% with turns...........typically takes 8 minutes to go up 8 to go down............i would run my 6.0 @4200 in 2nd, for 8 minutes straight. ATF temp gets to about 220 then stops, all other temps seemingly uneffected. Going down, I leave it in first and scream at 5500rpm, no brakes...........when doing this, the temps actually go down. Seen it for my own eyes while hooked up to my HP tuners VCM scanner.........It isn't 2005 either. Diesel costs $4 a gallon around here and RUG is $2.50, and you've got unreliable emissions controls to deal with on top of the costlier fuel. Mileage is similar. There's no reason to consider a diesel unless you want to tow over 15K lbs.
I'm shopping used heavy duty trucks and have no intention of considering a diesel.
You're a man who knows what he wants....My current work truck is a 15 gmc 3500 drw 4x4 6.0 gasser. This was my personal truck, until I sold my DMax 3500, and turned it into my daily work truck.....anyway it just broke 80000 miles........Before it life as my work truck, it would generally be used to tow my 5th wheel. (12000 lbs actual) to the beach, in the mountains and so on. There is one pass on 421 in NC westbound toward Boone.........12 miles, 6-8% with turns...........typically takes 8 minutes to go up 8 to go down............i would run my 6.0 @4200 in 2nd, for 8 minutes straight. ATF temp gets to about 220 then stops, all other temps seemingly uneffected. Going down, I leave it in first and scream at 5500rpm, no brakes...........when doing this, the temps actually go down. Seen it for my own eyes while hooked up to my HP tuners VCM scanner.........
Currently, when I tow my excavator (8500 lbs kx91-3 kubota with attachments) it goes on my 22500lbs triple axle goose.........total weight is about 15500 depending on some other factors.........
Sure it is slower than a diesel, but does the same thing......get a diesel hot and watch what happens......not so much with gas.
Point is, people have got spoiled with the power of modern trucks......they literally have too much power in some cases (if there is such a thing). 25 years ago, the highest tow rating for a truck was the GM 7.4 in the 3500hd with 4.56 gears, with a measly 290 hp \ 410 ft lbs, and those trucks are still on the road today, especially for AT&T guys. Gas engines in trucks are made to spin, so spin them! Of course, many people today really dont know how to drive.........
Mostly Valvoline / Napa synthetic used throughout its life thus far, but switching to RP HMX on next service as I despise Valvoline for selling out to the Saudis........
?You're a man who knows what he wants....