EV sales rise and key revenue from gas tax plunges

Taxing fuel and taxing recharge energy makes sense. Double-taxing "regular" hybrids, which obtain all their energy from fuel, does not. I'm paying nearly as much fuel tax as I would've travelling the same annual distance with my previous gasoline burner, plus the annual hybrid registration penalty that also exceeds the fuel tax for the gasoline car.

If they really need more $$$ for roads, they should simply raise the existing tax. It isn't absolutely fair, but it's closer to fair than any other way, and is easy to collect without infringing on anyone's privacy.
I noticed that here. I was talking to a guy that owns a Camry hybrid and at the time the EV tax was $100. He was paying $75 for his hybrid. I couldn't see how that was supposed to make sense. I'd have to check and see what the rate is now, but I'm assuming his doubled as well.
 
JK, you always pull this I don't believe it crap. How about the same thing another site? You would not know facts if they blew up your backside, the only facts you recognise are one you make up.

https://www.latimes.com/environment...wth-in-electric-cars-degrade-california-roads
You citing facts with your anti Tesla avatar is laughable at best.

We've all told you we pay an additional road tax. We pay more in road tax than a driver does in a gas vehicle unless we're covering more than 20,000 miles(at least in my state). What do you want to hear? If the money isn't going to the right place take it up with the government for misappropriating funds. We're paying our bills.
 
JK, you always pull this I don't believe it crap. How about the same thing another site? You would not know facts if they blew up your backside, the only facts you recognise are ones you make up.

https://www.latimes.com/environment...wth-in-electric-cars-degrade-california-roads
Did you read my post? It seems you missed the point. I did not say the article was false, I said it was incomplete and misleading.
In fact, I bolded a part that largely supported the article; I just expanded on it with reality.

I think the difference between you and me, even when we agree like we do on the road tax revenue decline, is that I look for solution while you do not. I believe you are more than capable to add valid, helpful commentary; you do so on other topics.

I also said the Daily Mail is not considered a reputable publication.
 
Last edited:
On the state level such as California your mileage is reported every year during an inspection

What inspection? There are none in California. The only time mileage might be reported is during each smog check, and even then it’s possible to avoid it for about eight years with a new car. EVs and CNG powered vehicles are exempt. Maybe fuel cell too, but I don’t see it listed.
 
The article is pretty misleading and incomplete. In CA we pay $100 or more per year at registration time for EVs to offset the gas tax, regardless of mileage. This fee is being tied to the CPI; it will continue to increase.

California has the highest gasoline excise tax in the nation; the revenue goes to the Highway Users Tax Account that funds
the construction and maintenance of public roads, mass transit systems, airports, and waterways. In addition, California's gas tax also funds large-scale infrastructure, environmental compliance for transportation projects, and initiatives to protect natural habitats.

The tax revenue has gone down and is expected to do so from EV and hybrid vehicles use, and in general better fuel efficiency across the board. The pandemic caused a big drop in gas consumption; this has been recovering.

Those declines in tax dollars will be partially offset by the state's new road improvement fee, which drivers pay when they register their electric cars for the 1st time, currently $118. I expect gas taxes and registrations to increase, use of other funds and possibly a fee based on annual mileage. The mileage based fee makes the most sense to me. I am against raising the gas tax because it unfairly affects low income households who cannot afford an EV or even any new car.

We will manage this; change is not easy. Throwing stones is easy.

I am not surprised at this article, considering the source. The Daily Mail has been criticized for its unreliability, its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories about science and medical research, and for instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement. Heck, in February 2017, the English Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a reliable source.

Believe what you want, but facts matter.
Daily Mail might as well be The Onion.
 
You citing facts with your anti Tesla avatar is laughable at best.

We've all told you we pay an additional road tax. We pay more in road tax than a driver does in a gas vehicle unless we're covering more than 20,000 miles(at least in my state). What do you want to hear? If the money isn't going to the right place take it up with the government for misappropriating funds. We're paying our bills.
You are not paying a fuel tax. For that reason you should be paying an extra fee per mile of use equal to what the gas tax would be.
You ev owners are basically free riding and it has to stop.
 
You are not paying a fuel tax. For that reason you should be paying an extra fee per mile of use equal to what the gas tax would be.
You ev owners are basically free riding and it has to stop.
Wrong, at least in California. I listed some of the EV specific fees in my post #34.
 
Last edited:
You are not paying a fuel tax. For that reason you should be paying an extra fee per mile of use equal to what the gas tax would be.
You ev owners are basically free riding and it has to stop.
Trav, EV owners are paying a penalty at registration which is greater than what they would pay annually in gas tax if they drive ICE. How is that equitable?
 
Last edited:
What inspection? There are none in California. The only time mileage might be reported is during each smog check, and even then it’s possible to avoid it for about eight years with a new car. EVs and CNG powered vehicles are exempt. Maybe fuel cell too, but I don’t see it listed.
Really? WOW, well then don’t you worry they will figure something out or just keep raising the registration fee. Somehow though the Fed has to figure out how to collect the 18.4 cents per gallon it collects on gasoline. Maybe cut back highway funds and leave it to the states to collect more on EVs.
I’m quite surprised by your post. I figured CA would be the last place on earth to have no inspections.
My mistake!
Oh wait. Maybe an annual mileage scan for EV owners ?
 
You are not paying a fuel tax. For that reason you should be paying an extra fee per mile of use equal to what the gas tax would be.
You ev owners are basically free riding and it has to stop.
I pay a ROAD TAX. It is to cover the fuel tax I do not pay. It's not called a fuel tax because I'm not buying fuel. ICE vehicles do not pay the additional road tax because it comes out in the fuel tax.

Am I speaking English?
 
Really? WOW, well then don’t you worry they will figure something out or just keep raising the registration fee. Somehow though the Fed has to figure out how to collect the 18.4 cents per gallon it collects on gasoline. Maybe cut back highway funds and leave it to the states to collect more on EVs.
I’m quite surprised by your post. I figured CA would be the last place on earth to have no inspections.
My mistake!
Oh wait. Maybe an annual mileage scan for EV owners ?
That's news to me too. I thought they did like New York. I've lived in mostly rural areas in the midwest where I have not seen it so I haven't dealt with it much. Phoenix had the inspections, but I don't think most of Arizona itself did. I do not know that for sure.
 
That's news to me too. I thought they did like New York. I've lived in mostly rural areas in the midwest where I have not seen it so I haven't dealt with it much. Phoenix had the inspections, but I don't think most of Arizona itself did. I do not know that for sure.

There's some weird claims that California requires an annual inspection, but it's news to me since I've never had to get one in decades. This claim is just odd.

Do I Need a Safety Inspection in California?​

Yes. In addition to annual smog inspections, or emissions checks as they’re technically called, you’ll also need to bring your vehicle into a certified repair shop for a yearly safety inspection. CA state safety inspections are required “to make sure that all vehicles used on public roads are in good condition and safe to drive”.​

This is just flat out wrong. There are licensed auto repair places that can do headlight and vehicle inspections, but that usually only required when one is pulled over and the vehicle is suspected of being in inadequate driving condition. I've had to get a headlamp inspection a few times for a fix it ticket for a burned out headlamp, but that could be done by any state "peace officer" for free if one can be tracked down. I remember once I just a saw a police car parked on the side of the road and asked if the officer if he could sign off that my headlamp was working and he said he's asked to do it on a regular basis.
 
CA does not have annual inspections or any scheduled inspections. A Peace Officer can give you a fix-it ticket, but that's about all that I know of.
We have biannual smog tests for most cars.
 
That would be the fair thing to do. But so far, no one has figured a way to easily do this. Asking EV owners to report mileage each year at registration will likely result in under reporting. Have a LEO verify mileage at registration? Cumbersome and expensive, with better use of the time of a LEO. Track it electronically, like other metrics that can be picked up from cars? Seems like an intrusion on privacy to most.
A tax on kWh reported by the car through the charge port solves this. It's the same as paying per litre or per gallon. Charging at home, the car communicates the kWh it pulls to your smart meter. Public charge stations already know how many kWh you buy, so that's even easier.
 
What we can do is just go flat rate for everyone and remove the gas tax so everyone can get over it and stop complaining about all of this. We'll all pay more in the end this way, but there's not a way to get use accurately counted in without logging mileage on an EV and that still would be different than the amount of power it uses. Just go flat rate for everyone so we can all get fairly screwed.
A gas tax is flat rate, for every gallon of gas you burn you create a presumed amount of road wear. Drive further? Burn more gas, pay more.
 
A gas tax is flat rate, for every gallon of gas you burn you create a presumed amount of road wear. Drive further? Burn more gas, pay more.

Federal and state gas taxes generally only pay for numbered highways, and even then they don't typically cover all costs. Certainly local roads are paid for with general funds.
 
Owners of gasoline cars are paying 18.4 cents a gallon in federal excise tax. This funds the interstate system and giveaways to individual states. I have no idea if money is diverted to other causes as well, but I think we could all guess at that one!
This hasn't increased since the mid 1990s and is so low it's not something to be proud of. Income does not meet expenditures.

https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2023-10/59634.pdf
 
A tax on kWh reported by the car through the charge port solves this. It's the same as paying per litre or per gallon. Charging at home, the car communicates the kWh it pulls to your smart meter. Public charge stations already know how many kWh you buy, so that's even easier.

Not everything communicates outside of rudimentary information about the vehicle. When I've plugged into a Tesla Destination Charger, it doesn't report anything and doesn't care. I don't think ChargePoint or similar worry about the car, but rather the user account.
 
Back
Top Bottom